Memory interference in multimicroprocessor systems with a time-shared bus

1984 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
pp. 61 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.A. Grasso ◽  
T.S. Dillon ◽  
K.E. Forward
1976 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Merikle

Report of single letters from centrally-fixated, seven-letter, target rows was probed by either auditory or visual cues. The target rows were presented for 100 ms, and the report cues were single digits which indicated the spatial location of a letter. In three separate experiments, report was always better with the auditory cues. The advantage for the auditory cues was maintained both when target rows were masked by a patterned stimulus and when the auditory cues were presented 500 ms later than comparable visual cues. The results indicate that visual cues produce modality-specific interference which operates at a level of processing beyond iconic representation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 154 ◽  
pp. 107776
Author(s):  
Casper Kerrén ◽  
Inês Bramão ◽  
Robin Hellerstedt ◽  
Mikael Johansson

1995 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur P. Shimamura ◽  
Paul J. Jurica ◽  
Jennifer A. Mangels ◽  
Felick B. Gershberg ◽  
Robert T. Knight

Patients with frontal lobe lesions were adminstered tests of paired-associate learning in which cue and response words are manipulated to increase interference across two study lists. In one test of paired-associate learning (AB-AC test), cue words used in one list are repeated in a second list but are associated with different response words (e.g., LION-HUNTER, LION-CIRCUS). In another test (AB-ABr test), words used in one list are repeated in a second list but are rearranged to form new pairs. Compared to control subjects, patients with frontal lobe lesions exhibited disproportionate impairment of second-list learning as a result of interference effects. In particular, patients exhibited the poorest performance during the initial trial of the second list, a trial in which interference effects from the first list would be most apparent. These findings suggest that the on-line control of irrelevant or competing memory associations is disrupted following frontal lobe lesions. This disruption may be indicative of an impaired gating or filtering mechanism that affects not only memory function but other cognitive function as well.


2011 ◽  
Vol 102 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 332-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.G. Blake ◽  
M.M. Boccia ◽  
M.C. Krawczyk ◽  
C.M. Baratti

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document