Surface-integral methods of calculating forces on magnetized iron parts

1960 ◽  
Vol 107 (11) ◽  
pp. 19 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.J. Carpenter
2008 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 381-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. L. Pan ◽  
A. Uzun ◽  
A. S. Lyrintzis

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 61-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Wiedenmann ◽  
T. F. Eibert

Abstract. The linear equation systems which arise from the discretization of surface integral equations are conveniently solved with iterative methods because of the possibility to employ fast integral methods like the Multilevel Fast Multipole Method. However, especially integral equations of the first kind often lead to very ill-conditioned systems, which require the usage of effective preconditioners. In this paper, the regularization property of near-zone preconditioning operators on the Electric Field Integral Equation is demonstrated and investigated for problems of different size. Furthermore, comparisons are drawn to second-kind integral equations such as the Combined Field Integral Equation.


PAMM ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1022703-1022704
Author(s):  
M. Ganesh ◽  
S. C. Hawkins

2003 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasios S. Lyrintzis

A review of recent advances in the use of surface integral methods in Computational AeroAcoustics (CAA) for the extension of near-field CFD results to the acoustic far-field is given. These integral formulations (i.e. Kirchhoff's method, permeable (porous) surface Ffowcs-Williams Hawkings (FW-H) equation) allow the radiating sound to be evaluated based on quantities on an arbitrary control surface if the wave equation is assumed outside. Thus only surface integrals are needed for the calculation of the far-field sound, instead of the volume integrals required by the traditional acoustic analogy method (i.e. Lighthill, rigid body FW-H equation). A numerical CFD method is used for the evaluation of the flow-field solution in the near field and thus on the control surface. Diffusion and dispersion errors associated with wave propagation in the far-field are avoided. The surface integrals and the first derivatives needed can be easily evaluated from the near-field CFD data. Both methods can be extended in order to include refraction effects outside the control surface. The methods have been applied to helicopter noise, jet noise, propeller noise, ducted fan noise, etc. A simple set of portable Kirchhoff/FW-H subroutines can be developed to calculate the far-field noise from inputs supplied by any aerodynamic near/mid-field CFD code.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document