Economic batch quantity theory discussion widens

1984 ◽  
Vol 63 (9) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Tom Medlrum
Keyword(s):  
1983 ◽  
Vol 62 (10) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
John L. Burbidge
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
pp. 31-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Glazyev

The article critically considers basic postulates of quantity theory of money. It shows that they reflect the static state of the economy in abstract models of market equilibrium but do not prove true in actual economic processes. In contrast to monetarists’ view, prices can rise as well as fall even if other variables of the monetarist equation are stable. Thus it cannot be used for grounding monetary policy. The author comes to the conclusion on the dogmatism of Russian monetary authorities that seriously hinders the country’s economic development. He proposes to switch to market organization of money supply basing on regulation of the refinancing rate.


1974 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. W. Howitt
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
pp. 115-123
Author(s):  
Robert W. Dimand

In the two decades before World War I, Irving Fisher and his French contemporary Adolphe Landry presented and extended Boehm-Bawerk's theory capital and interest, although both of them criticized Boehm-Bawerk's concept of an average period of production. They analyzed each other's work on interest theory in books reviews and books. They both attempted to construct an operationally meaninful version of the quantity theory of money, with Fisher building explicitly on early studies by Landry and Pierre des Essars in France and by Edwin Kemmerer and David Kinley in the US.


2002 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 583-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Costas Karfakis
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document