scholarly journals Statistical strong lensing. III. Inferences with complete samples of lenses

Author(s):  
A. Sonnenfeld
Keyword(s):  
2014 ◽  
Vol 783 (1) ◽  
pp. 52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret J. Geller ◽  
Ho Seong Hwang ◽  
Antonaldo Diaferio ◽  
Michael J. Kurtz ◽  
Dan Coe ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Qiuhan He ◽  
Ran Li ◽  
Sungsoon Lim ◽  
Carlos S Frenk ◽  
Shaun Cole ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Johan Richard ◽  
Graham P. Smith ◽  
Jean-Paul Kneib ◽  
Richard S. Ellis ◽  
A. J. R. Sanderson ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 396 (1) ◽  
pp. 354-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Gilmore ◽  
Priyamvada Natarajan
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 504 (2) ◽  
pp. 2224-2234
Author(s):  
Nan Li ◽  
Christoph Becker ◽  
Simon Dye

ABSTRACT Measurements of the Hubble–Lemaitre constant from early- and local-Universe observations show a significant discrepancy. In an attempt to understand the origin of this mismatch, independent techniques to measure H0 are required. One such technique, strong lensing time delays, is set to become a leading contender amongst the myriad methods due to forthcoming large strong lens samples. It is therefore critical to understand the systematic effects inherent in this method. In this paper, we quantify the influence of additional structures along the line of sight by adopting realistic light-cones derived from the cosmoDC2 semi-analytical extragalactic catalogue. Using multiple-lens plane ray tracing to create a set of simulated strong lensing systems, we have investigated the impact of line-of-sight structures on time-delay measurements and in turn, on the inferred value of H0. We have also tested the reliability of existing procedures for correcting for line-of-sight effects. We find that if the integrated contribution of the line-of-sight structures is close to a uniform mass sheet, the bias in H0 can be adequately corrected by including a constant external convergence κext in the lens model. However, for realistic line-of-sight structures comprising many galaxies at different redshifts, this simple correction overestimates the bias by an amount that depends linearly on the median external convergence. We therefore conclude that lens modelling must incorporate multiple-lens planes to account for line-of-sight structures for accurate and precise inference of H0.


2006 ◽  
Vol 458 (2) ◽  
pp. 349-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Cacciato ◽  
M. Bartelmann ◽  
M. Meneghetti ◽  
L. Moscardini
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 398 (2) ◽  
pp. 635-657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Mandelbaum ◽  
Glenn van de Ven ◽  
Charles R. Keeton

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (A29B) ◽  
pp. 793-794
Author(s):  
Keren Sharon ◽  
Michael D. Gladders ◽  
Jane R. Rigby ◽  
Matthew B. Bayliss ◽  
Eva Wuyts ◽  
...  

AbstractDriven by the unprecedented wealth of high quality data that is accumulating for the Frontier Fields, they are becoming some of the best-studied strong lensing clusters to date, and probably the next few years. As will be discussed intensively in this focus meeting, the FF prove transformative for many fields: from studies of the high redshift Universe, to the assembly and structure of the clusters themselves. The FF data and the extensive collaborative effort around this program will also allow us to examine and improve upon current lens modeling techniques. Strong lensing is a powerful tool for mass reconstruction of the cores of galaxy clusters of all scales, providing an estimate of the total (dark and seen) projected mass density distribution out to 0.5 Mpc. Though SL mass may be biased by contribution from structures along the line of sight, its strength is that it is relatively insensitive to assumptions on cluster baryon astrophysics and dynamical state. Like the Frontier Fields clusters, the most “famous” strong lensing clusters are at the high mass end; they lens dozens of background sources into multiple images, providing ample lensing constraints. In this talk, I will focus on how we can leverage what we learn from modeling the FF clusters in strong lensing studies of the hundreds of clusters that will be discovered in upcoming surveys. In typical clusters, unlike the Frontier Fields, the Bullet Cluster and A1689, we observe only one to a handful of background sources, and have limited lensing constraints. I will describe the limitations that such a configuration imposes on strong lens modeling, highlight measurements that are robust to the richness of lensing evidence, and address the sources of uncertainty and what sort of information can help reduce those uncertainties. This category of lensing clusters is most relevant to the wide cluster surveys of the future.


2014 ◽  
Vol 786 (1) ◽  
pp. 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Grillo ◽  
R. Gobat ◽  
V. Presotto ◽  
I. Balestra ◽  
A. Mercurio ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document