Sertoli–stromal cell tumor of the ovary: Immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and genetic studies

2001 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 796-802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noriko Kato ◽  
Masayuki Fukase ◽  
Iwao Ono ◽  
Kazuhito Matsumoto ◽  
Etsuo Okazaki ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Rabinovich ◽  
Isabella W.Y. Mak ◽  
Robert W. Cowan ◽  
Robert E. Turcotte ◽  
Nigel Colterjohn ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 459 ◽  
pp. 8-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Ghert ◽  
Nicole Simunovic ◽  
Robert W Cowan ◽  
Nigel Colterjohn ◽  
Gurmit Singh

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 203-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted S. Liao ◽  
Matthew B. Yurgelun ◽  
Seong-Sil Chang ◽  
Hui-Zhu Zhang ◽  
Koko Murakami ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 592-594
Author(s):  
Toshiko Yamano ◽  
Kumiko Ando ◽  
Reiichi Ishikura ◽  
Norio Nakao ◽  
Toshitada Ogasawara

2000 ◽  
Vol 179 (4) ◽  
pp. 252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Neuhaus ◽  
Richard J Bold
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 142 (10) ◽  
pp. 1289-1291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan DeCoste ◽  
Saul L. Offman

Signet ring stromal cell tumor is a rare, benign ovarian neoplasm thought to arise from ovarian stromal cells. The pathophysiology of these tumors is poorly understood. They present in women in a wide age range, often with nonspecific symptoms including lower abdominal or pelvic pain. Their morphologic appearance raises a critical differential diagnosis of Krukenberg tumor, an aggressive malignancy with significant implications for patient management. For this reason, it is important for the pathologist to be aware of signet ring stromal cell tumor and its differentiating features, including useful histochemical and immunohistochemical ancillary tests. These tumors are curable with surgical excision, and there have been no recurrences or metastases among reported cases.


1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 274-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
R J Motzer ◽  
E Rodriguez ◽  
V E Reuter ◽  
G J Bosl ◽  
M Mazumdar ◽  
...  

PURPOSE A minority of patients with poorly differentiated carcinoma achieve a complete response to cisplatin therapy. Recently, specific chromosomal abnormalities have been described for several solid tumor malignancies. Molecular and cytogenetic techniques were used to study tumors of patients with midline carcinoma of unknown primary site. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty patients with poorly differentiated carcinoma of unknown primary site had fresh tumor samples studied by cytogenetic analysis, Southern blot analysis for 12p copy number, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the identification of i(12p) and chromosome 12 aneuploidy. The response to cisplatin therapy was correlated to the diagnosis provided by the genetic studies. RESULTS In 17 (42%) patients, a diagnosis was suggested by the genetic studies. This included a germ cell tumor in 12 (30%) patients by the finding of i(12p), increased 12p copy number, or a deletion of the long arm of chromosome 12. In five patients, a specific diagnosis other than germ cell tumor was suggested by tumor karyotype. These were neuroepithelioma, lymphoma, desmoplastic small-cell tumor, melanoma, and clear-cell sarcoma. The 75% response proportion to cisplatin therapy in patients with tumors showing chromosome structural abnormalities of germ cell tumor was greater than the 18% response proportion in patients for whom no diagnosis was provided (P = .002). CONCLUSION Molecular and cytogenetic studies are useful in establishing specific diagnoses in patients with poorly differentiated carcinomas of unknown primary site. This group of tumors is heterogeneous and is composed of germ cell tumors, melanoma, lymphoma, neuroepithelioma, and desmoplastic small-round-cell tumor in addition to some that are not yet classifiable. Response to cisplatin therapy correlates with the finding of i(12p) in tumor by either molecular or cytogenetic studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document