Patient-Perceived Recovery and Outcomes After Silastic Implant Arthroplasty

2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 1080-1086 ◽  
Author(s):  
Calvin J. Rushing ◽  
Viraj R. Rathnayake ◽  
Adam J. Oxios ◽  
Gabriel P. Galan ◽  
Madelin Ramil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Contraception ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 341-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Takkar ◽  
P.N. Anandalaxmi ◽  
V.L. Chandra ◽  
S. Bhatnagar ◽  
H.S. Yadav ◽  
...  

Contraception ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 505-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shakuntala Bhatnagar ◽  
U.K. Srivastava ◽  
D. Takkar ◽  
V.L. Chandra ◽  
V. Hingorani ◽  
...  

Foot & Ankle ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 173-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathaniel Gould

The purpose of this paper is to introduce a surgical approach to treatment of severe forefoot deformities of rheumatoid arthritis. Briefly, the surgery consists of base of the first metatarsal osteotomy to correct metatarsus primus varus, and metatarsal head resection beginning with the fifth metatarsal and carried around in crescentic fashion through the necks of the other metatarsals, so that as an end result the great toe is the longest, the second next to the longest, etc. The short extensor tendons are dissected to their insertions and, since they have drifted laterally into the “valleys” pulling the toes into lateral drift with them, they are usually sacrificed. The long extensor tendons are appropriately lengthened to proper tension. All the toes are straightened by plantar capsulotomies, dermotomies, and long flexor tenotomies, and the toes held straight with C-.045 wire in shishkabob fashion. Then, under direct vision, each wire is drilled up into the metatarsal shaft, aligning the toes into parallel cosmetic fashion. In the early cases, a single stem silastic implant was utilized but for the past 5 years now the double stem silastic implant is employed for the first MTP joint and is inserted “upside down” in order to give its greater power towards the floor. A cast is not used, but the patient ambulates on a well-padded bandaged foot by the second or third day. Twenty patients (40 feet) were operated upon (17 females and 3 males, ages 28 to 72 years, average 47 years), with a follow-up of 3 to 5 years. Pain relief has been remarkable. Good great toe function has been obtained in all cases with excellent power to the floor and a satisfactory range of dorsiflexion ability. About 67% have developed some mild recurrence of hallux valgus, but none so severe that it has been disabling. All patients have been pleased with their final results.


2020 ◽  
Vol 102-B (2) ◽  
pp. 220-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy M. Clough ◽  
Joseph Ring

Aims Arthroplasty for end-stage hallux rigidus (HR) is controversial. Arthrodesis remains the gold standard for surgical treatment, although is not without its complications, with rates of up to 10% for nonunion, 14% for reoperation and 10% for metatarsalgia. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of a double-stemmed silastic implant (Wright-Medical, Memphis, Tennessee, USA) for patients with end-stage HR. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of 108 consecutive implants in 76 patients, between January 2005 and December 2016, with a minimum follow-up of two years. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 61.6 years (42 to 84). There were 104 females and four males. Clinical, radiological, patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) data, a visual analogue score (VAS) for pain, and satisfaction scores were collected. Results The survivorship at a mean follow-up of 5.3 years (2.1 to 14.1) was 97.2%. The mean Manchester Oxford Foot and Ankle Questionnaire (MOXFQ) scores improved from 78.1 to 11.0, and VAS scores for pain from 7/10 to 1.3/10. The rate of satisfaction was 90.6%. Three implants (2.8%) required revision; one for infection, one-month postoperatively, and two for stem breakage at 10.4 and 13.3 years postoperatively. There was a 1.9% reoperation rate other than revision, 23.1% of patients developed a minor complication, and 21.1% of patients had non-progressive and asymptomatic cysts on radiological review. Conclusion We report a 97.2% survivorship at a mean follow-up of 5.3 years with this implant. We did not find progressive osteolysis, as has been previously reported. These results suggest that this double-stemmed silastic implant provides a predictable and reliable alternative with comparable outcomes to arthrodesis for the treatment of end-stage HR. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(2):220–226.


Contraception ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 593-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vimla Laumas ◽  
B.K. Malik ◽  
Krira Jamal ◽  
Uma Seth ◽  
N. Agarwal ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document