Absence of Peroneus Tertius in Split Anterior Tibialis Tendon Transfer Surgery

Author(s):  
Katherine S. Antoniak ◽  
Oussama Abousamra
2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juanita Wallace ◽  
Hank White ◽  
Jing Xi ◽  
Richard Kryscio ◽  
Sam Augsburger ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 98 (7) ◽  
pp. 829-833 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Gasse ◽  
T. Luth ◽  
F. Loisel ◽  
A. Serre ◽  
L. Obert ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 396-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin W. Fennell ◽  
P. Phillips

The observation that, when performing a split anterior tibialis tendon transfer, a twist develops as the distal segment is brought into position on the lateral side of the foot led to our hypothesis that, as a consequence of foot rotation during embryologic development, rotation of the tendon of the anterior tibialis muscle also occurs and can be seen in the adult.


2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 1038-1041 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher P. Henderson ◽  
Brent G. Parks ◽  
Gregory P. Guyton

Background: If whole and split transfer of the anterior tibialis tendon (SPLATT) do not differ in balancing the forefoot, whole tendon transfer would provide a simpler alternative as part of treatment of an equinovarus deformity. We hypothesized that no significant differences in percent plantar lateral forefoot pressures would be observed between split and whole tendon transfer. We used a spastic model to test the hypothesis that overcorrection would not occur with whole tendon transfer. Materials and Methods: In ten specimens from five lower extremity matched pairs, a SPLATT was anchored to the cuboid. After loading, simulated whole tendon transfer to the lateral cuneiform was done. Normal loading was Achilles, 250 N, tibialis anterior, 200 N, peroneals/tibialis posterior, 142 N; and spastic loading was Achilles, 500 N, tibialis anterior, 400 N, peroneals/tibialis posterior, 142 N. Pressure data were collected for both normal and spastic conditions. Percent of forefoot pressure was calculated for the lateral and medial sector. Results: Percent lateral pressure was slightly lower after whole tendon transfer (normal, p < 0.01; spastic, p < 0.01). This difference was not clinically important. Medial pressure did not differ in the spastic versus the normal model after split or whole tendon transfer. Conclusion: Whole and split anterior tibialis tendon transfer both resulted in a balanced forefoot. Neither whole tendon nor split tendon transfer resulted in overcorrection in a simulated spastic model. Clinical Relevance: Whole tendon transfer may be an effective and simpler alternative to SPLATT for unloading the lateral forefoot in both a normal and a spastic foot.


1997 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
James B. Talmage

Abstract The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, Fourth Edition, uses the Injury Model to rate impairment in people who have experienced back injuries. Injured individuals who have not required surgery can be rated using differentiators. Challenges arise when assessing patients whose injuries have been treated surgically before the patient is rated for impairment. This article discusses five of the most common situations: 1) What is the impairment rating for an individual who has had an injury resulting in sciatica and who has been treated surgically, either with chemonucleolysis or with discectomy? 2) What is the impairment rating for an individual who has a back strain and is operated on without reasonable indications? 3) What is the impairment rating of an individual with sciatica and a foot drop (major anterior tibialis weakness) from L5 root damage? 4) What is the rating for an individual who is injured, has true radiculopathy, undergoes a discectomy, and is rated as Category III but later has another injury and, ultimately, a second disc operation? 5) What is the impairment rating for an older individual who was asymptomatic until a minor strain-type injury but subsequently has neurogenic claudication with severe surgical spinal stenosis on MRI/myelography? [Continued in the September/October 1997 The Guides Newsletter]


2002 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
A VANHEEST

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document