Tibial bone harvesting under intravenous sedation: Morbidity and patient experiences

2002 ◽  
Vol 60 (10) ◽  
pp. 1151-1154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose M. Marchena ◽  
Michael S. Block ◽  
John D. Stover
Keyword(s):  
Patient Experiences ◽  
Intravenous Sedation ◽  
Tibial Bone ◽  
Bone Harvesting

Minimally invasive tibial bone harvesting under intravenous sedation

2005 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 464-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Hernández-Alfaro ◽  
Carlos Martí ◽  
Maria José Biosca ◽  
Javier Gimeno
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Intravenous Sedation ◽  
Tibial Bone ◽  
Bone Harvesting

scholarly journals Proximal Tibial Bone Harvesting Under Local Anesthesia Without Intravenous Sedation in the Dental Office: A Case Report

2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Ming Chen ◽  
Pai-Li Chen ◽  
Chung-Wei Wu ◽  
I-Yueh Huang ◽  
Kun-Tsung Lee
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Local Anesthesia ◽  
Intravenous Sedation ◽  
Tibial Bone ◽  
Bone Harvesting ◽  
Dental Office

Complications of Minimally Invasive Tibial Bone Harvesting: Risk Factors and Treatment

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 987-991
Author(s):  
Makoto Hirota ◽  
Toshinori Iwai ◽  
Tomomichi Ozawa ◽  
Nobuyuki Mizuki ◽  
Iwai Tohnai
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Tibial Bone ◽  
Bone Harvesting

Tibial Bone Fracture after Bone Harvesting from the Tibia

2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morimichi Ohya ◽  
Takehiro Fujimoto ◽  
Yuko Ito ◽  
Momoko Watabe ◽  
Noriyuki Yamamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Fracture ◽  
Tibial Bone ◽  
Bone Harvesting

Maxillary Sinus Augmentation With Autogenous Tibial Bone Graft as an In-Office Procedure

2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmitry Peysakhov ◽  
Elie M. Ferneini ◽  
Richard G. Bevilacqua
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Office Procedure ◽  
Sinus Augmentation ◽  
Tibial Bone ◽  
Bone Harvesting ◽  
Low Incidence ◽  
Sinus Grafting

This retrospective study evaluates the efficacy of maxillary sinus grafting using autologous tibial bone in an outpatient setting. Twenty-seven patients undergoing lateral proximal tibial bone graft with subsequent sinus lifts were involved in this study. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon in a private practice setting. A total of 28 tibial bone grafts and sinus lifts were performed on 27 patients. All subjects had minimal morbidity without any major complications. At the 1-year follow-up all implants that were placed into the grafted sites maintained stability, and no implants were lost. Two patients complained of hypertrophic scars at the site of bone harvesting (7.4%). One patient complained of leg pain for 10 weeks after the procedure, which resolved completely (2.7%). Overall complication rate was 10.1%. We conclude that the surgical harvesting of proximal tibial bone is associated with a low incidence of overall complications, mild postoperative pain, relative ease of harvest, minimal operative time, immediate ambulation, and rapid recovery, which make it an ideal office procedure when a significant amount of corticocancellous bone is required for maxillary sinus grafting.

Sentence-Based Experience Logging in New Hearing Aid Users

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (3S) ◽  
pp. 631-637
Author(s):  
Katja Lund ◽  
Rodrigo Ordoñez ◽  
Jens Bo Nielsen ◽  
Dorte Hammershøi
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Patient Experiences ◽  
Online Tool ◽  
Rehabilitation Process ◽  
Hearing Rehabilitation ◽  
Clinical Observations ◽  
Hearing Aid Use ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Shed Light

Purpose The aim of this study was to develop a tool to gain insight into the daily experiences of new hearing aid users and to shed light on aspects of aided performance that may not be unveiled through standard questionnaires. Method The tool is developed based on clinical observations, patient experiences, expert involvement, and existing validated hearing rehabilitation questionnaires. Results An online tool for collecting data related to hearing aid use was developed. The tool is based on 453 prefabricated sentences representing experiences within 13 categories related to hearing aid use. Conclusions The tool has the potential to reflect a wide range of individual experiences with hearing aid use, including auditory and nonauditory aspects. These experiences may hold important knowledge for both the patient and the professional in the hearing rehabilitation process.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document