Managing diversity and inequality in health

2002 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 106
Author(s):  
Tracy Clapham
Keyword(s):  
Managing Diversity ◽  
Inequality In Health

The limits of top-down approaches to managing diversity: Lessons from the case of child protection and child rights in Sierra Leone.

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 574-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. Wessells ◽  
David F. M. Lamin ◽  
Dora King ◽  
Kathleen Kostelny ◽  
Lindsay Stark ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sierra Leone ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Top Down ◽  
Child Rights ◽  
Managing Diversity

Managing Diversity und internationale Unternehmensführung

2003 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-115
Author(s):  
Dieter Wagner ◽  
Bernd Voigt
Keyword(s):  
Managing Diversity

Racial Inequality in Health Care During a Pandemic

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raphael Bruce ◽  
Sergio Firpo ◽  
Michael França ◽  
Luis Meloni
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Racial Inequality ◽  
Inequality In Health

Socio-economic differences in smoking among adolescents in a school-based smoking intervention: The X:IT II study

2021 ◽  
pp. 140349482110076
Author(s):  
Lotus S. Bast ◽  
Lisbeth Lund ◽  
Stine G. LauemØller ◽  
Simone G. Kjeld ◽  
Pernille Due ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Preventive Intervention ◽  
First Year ◽  
Difference In Difference ◽  
Current Smoking ◽  
Smoking Intervention ◽  
School Time ◽  
School Based ◽  
Inequality In Health ◽  
Baseline Response

Aims: Socio-economic inequalities in health behaviour may be influenced by health interventions. We examined whether the X:IT II intervention, aiming at preventing smoking in adolescence, was equally effective among students from different occupational social classes (OSC). Methods: We used data from the multi-component school-based smoking preventive intervention X:IT II, targeting 13- to 15-year-olds in Denmark. The intervention was tested in 46 schools with 2307 eligible students at baseline (response rate=86.6%) and had three main intervention components: smoke-free school time, smoke-free curriculum and parental involvement. We used a difference-in-difference design and estimated the change in current smoking after the first year of implementation in high versus low OSC. Analyses were based on available cases ( N=1190) and imputation of missing data at follow-up ( N=1967). Results: We found that 1% of the students from high OSC and 4.9% from low OSC were smokers at baseline (imputed data), and 8.2% of the students from high OSC and 12.2% from low OSC were smokers at follow-up. Difference-in-difference estimates were close to zero, indicating no differential trajectory. Conclusions: As intended, the X:IT II intervention, designed to apply equally to students from all socio-economic groups, did not seem to create different trajectories in current smoking among adolescents in high and low socio-economic groups. To diminish social inequality in health, future studies should carefully consider the ability to affect all socio-economic groups equally, or even to appeal mainly to participants from lower socio-economic groups, as they are often the ones most in need of intervention.

scholarly journals Antidiscrimination Meets Integration Policies: Exploring New Diversity-Related Challenges in Europe

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 221
Author(s):  
Tina Magazzini
Keyword(s):  
Critical Race Studies ◽  
Racial Justice ◽  
Critical Race ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Race Studies ◽  
Managing Diversity ◽  
The Past ◽  
Migrant Integration ◽  
Multi Level ◽  
Racial Ethnic

Contemporary European societies are increasingly diverse. Migration both within and to Europe has contributed over the past decades to the rise of new religious, racial, ethnic, social, cultural and economic inequality. Such transformations have raised questions about the (multi-level) governance of diversity in Europe, thus determining new challenges for both scholars and policy-makers. Whilst the debate around diversity stemming from migration has become a major topic in urban studies, political science and sociology in Europe, Critical Race Studies and Intersectionality have become central in US approaches to understanding inequality and social injustice. Among the fields where ‘managing diversity’ has become particularly pressing, methodological issues on how to best approach minorities that suffer from multiple discrimination represent some of the hottest subjects of concern. Stemming from the interest in putting into dialogue the existing American scholarship on CRT and anti-discrimination with the European focus on migrant integration, this paper explores the issue of integration in relation to intersectionality by merging the two frames. In doing so, it provides some observations about the complementarity of a racial justice approach for facing the new diversity-related challenges in European polity. In particular, it illustrates how Critical Race Studies can contribute to the analysis of inequality in Europe while drawing on the integration literature.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document