scholarly journals Assessment of bowel cleansing quality in colon capsule endoscopy using machine learning: a pilot study

2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (08) ◽  
pp. E1044-E1050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Magdalena Buijs ◽  
Mohammed Hossain Ramezani ◽  
Jürgen Herp ◽  
Rasmus Kroijer ◽  
Morten Kobaek-Larsen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims The aim of this study was to develop a machine learning-based model to classify bowel cleansing quality and to test this model in comparison to a pixel analysis model and assessments by four colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) readers. Methods A pixel analysis and a machine learning-based model with four cleanliness classes (unacceptable, poor, fair and good) were developed to classify CCE videos. Cleansing assessments by four CCE readers in 41 videos from a previous study were compared to the results both models yielded in this pilot study. Results The machine learning-based model classified 47 % of the videos in agreement with the averaged classification by CCE readers, as compared to 32 % by the pixel analysis model. A difference of more than one class was detected in 12 % of the videos by the machine learning-based model and in 32 % by the pixel analysis model, as the latter tended to overestimate cleansing quality. A specific analysis of unacceptable videos found that the pixel analysis model classified almost all of them as fair or good, whereas the machine learning-based model identified five out of 11 videos in agreement with at least one CCE reader as unacceptable. Conclusions The machine learning-based model was superior to the pixel analysis in classifying bowel cleansing quality, due to a higher sensitivity to unacceptable and poor cleansing quality. The machine learning-based model can be further improved by coming to a consensus on how to classify cleanliness of a complete CCE video, by means of an expert panel.

2011 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. AB305-AB306
Author(s):  
Laura Ramos ◽  
Onofre Alarcón-Fernández ◽  
Antonio Z. Gimeno-García ◽  
David Nicolás-Pérez ◽  
Zaida Adrián-De-Ganzo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (10) ◽  
pp. E1542-E1548
Author(s):  
Nicolas Benech ◽  
Olivier Vinet ◽  
Jean-Louis Gaudin ◽  
Robert Benamouzig ◽  
Xavier Dray ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) has been proposed as an alternative to colonoscopy for screening patients at average risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). A prospective national cohort was developed to assess relevance of CCE in real-life practice and its short- and long-term impacts on clinical management. Patients and methods All patients who underwent a CCE in France were prospectively enrolled from January 2011 to May 2016 and reached annually by phone until May 2017. All CCE and colonoscopy reports were systematically collected. Results During the study period, 689 CCEs were analyzed from 14 medical centers. Median follow-up time was 35 months [IQR: 12–50]. Indication for CCE was mainly for elderly patients (median age: 70 years, IQR: [61–79]) due to anesthetic or colonoscopy contraindication (n = 307; 44.6 %). Only 337 CCEs (48.9 %) were both complete and with adequate bowel preparation. Advanced neoplasia (adenoma with high-grade dysplasia or CRC) was diagnosed following 32 CCEs (4.6 %). Among patients who underwent colonoscopy or therapeutic surgery following CCE, 18.8 % of all advanced neoplasias (6/32) had not been diagnosed by CCE mainly due to technical issues. Performing a colonoscopy in the case of significant polyps or insufficient bowel cleansing or after an incomplete CCE allowed the diagnosis of 96.9 % of all identified advanced neoplasias (31/32). Conclusions Outside the scope of academic trials, improvement is needed to increase the reliability of CCE as less than half were considered optimal i. e. complete with adequate bowel cleansing. Most of missed colonic advanced neoplasia were due to incomplete CCE with distal neoplasia location.


2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 101-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Ramos ◽  
Onofre Alarcón ◽  
Zaida Adrian ◽  
Antonio Z. Gimeno-García ◽  
David Nicolás-Pérez ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 579-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirotsugu Watabe ◽  
Tetsuya Nakamura ◽  
Atsuo Yamada ◽  
Yasuo Kakugawa ◽  
Sadaharu Nouda ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 300-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristiano Spada ◽  
Cesare Hassan ◽  
Marcello Ingrosso ◽  
Alessandro Repici ◽  
Maria Elena Riccioni ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document