92 Body radiofrequency fat removal/skin tightening Body Radiofrequency Fat Removal/Skin Tightening

Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Engin Selamioglu ◽  
Ercan Karacaoglu

Arm contouring is a desired goal of the arm esthetics. Brachioplasty is a developing and safe surgery to improve the arm silhouette but scar is a one of the most distracting factor for both patients and surgeons. In this chapter conventional liposuction with laser assisted liposuction (LAL) is proposed to yield satisfactory results in selected group of patients. Classification systems are helpful to decide for proper patient selection for this technique. It includes assessment of fat excess, skin excess, and location of the deformity (proximal, entire arm, arm and chest). Patients with minimal to extensive fat deposits plus minimal to moderate skin laxity are the best candidates for this approach. When properly performed, with realistic expectations, liposuction and LAL combination is considerably a procedure of choice for arm contouring in these selected cases. The contraction of arm skin is considerably consistent. Our approach, except in the most extreme cases, is to initially recommend liposuction and possibly even a second liposuction prior to recommending brachioplasty. An esthetically pleasant result can be obtained even in massive arms with good skin tone. Massive arms with poor skin tone, however, may not. Patient selection and preoperative planning are discussed in detail. A thorough description for patient positioning and anesthesia options are studied. The technique of the liposuction is widely described including specific regional contour goals with artistic attention to enhance the contour. Refinement regarding skin tightening and skin surface smoothness are also discussed. Arm contouring is a growing field of body contouring and can be practiced with low complication rates and high patient satisfaction. Available classification systems help to select proper patient group. Laser assisted fat removal combined with conventional liposuction are promising procedures for selected patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-28
Author(s):  
Erez Dayan ◽  
Joseph Marte ◽  
Spero Theodorou
Keyword(s):  
The Body ◽  

2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 585-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung Hee Min ◽  
Ji Hoon Kim ◽  
Hyo Jin Park ◽  
Heung Soo Chung ◽  
Chan Yeong Heo

Vox Sanguinis ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 112 (8) ◽  
pp. 759-766 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. F. Seyfried ◽  
M. Gruber ◽  
M. T. Pawlik ◽  
S. Kasper ◽  
R. J. Mandle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 677-688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serge Mordon ◽  
Eric Plot
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-23
Author(s):  
Akshay Sanan ◽  
Nikolaus Hjelm ◽  
Patrick Tassone ◽  
Howard Krein ◽  
Ryan N. Heffelfinger

Author(s):  
Sweekruthi A. Shetty ◽  
Melissa F. Young ◽  
Sunita Taneja ◽  
Kannan Rangiah

Background: Estimation of macronutrients like protein and lactose is important to assess the quality of milk. To estimate these two macronutrients, ten raw milk samples obtained from each group of different animals (cow, goat, buffalo), ten pasteurized cow milk and ten human milk samples were analysed. Methods: Bicinchoninic acid (BCA) method was used to estimate protein from different milk samples. Four different sample preparation protocols were compared to check the effect of fat on BCA based protein estimation: dilution (D), fat removal-protein precipitation (FR and PP), fat removal-dilution (FR and D) and dilution-fat removal (D and FR). For lactose quantification, ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-selected reaction monitoring (UHPLC-MS/SRM) method was developed and validated using 13C6 lactose as internal standard (ISTD).Result: Among these four different protocols, D and FR method showed consistent data for total protein content in animal milk (cow-3.16%, goat-3.21%, buffalo-3.81%, pasteurized-2.98%) and FR and PP showed consistent data in human milk samples (1.2%). Though BCA method is simple to use, proper sample preparation protocol has to be applied prior to protein estimation to avoid the interference due to fat or lactose. In case of lactose, inter-day validation showed the accuracy ranging from 97.13 to 100.54%, coefficient of variation varying between 0.1 to 1.53%, correlation R2=0.999. Lactose is in the range of 4.1 to 4.8% in animal milk and 6.6% in human milk samples. The internal ratio of lactose/protein (1.28 to 1.55 in animal milk and 5.33 in human milk) will be useful to differentiate human milk from animal milk type and to assess the milk quality.


2014 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. S199-S202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurel M. Morton ◽  
Jeffrey S. Dover
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document