Safe guidance of hybrid stentgraft placement and emergency true lumen cannulation in aortic dissection by angioscopy

2010 ◽  
Vol 58 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Tsagakis ◽  
M Kamler ◽  
P Tossios ◽  
J Benedik ◽  
N Pizanis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. e19-e20
Author(s):  
David J. O'Connor ◽  
Stanton Nielsen ◽  
Anjali Ratnathicam ◽  
Kristin Cook ◽  
Michael Wilderman ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (4) ◽  
pp. 604-609

Background: The choice of arterial inflow for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection repair remains controversial. The axillary artery should be considered as first choice for cannulation, but this technique is time-consuming. The ascending aortic cannulation provides antegrade perfusion and can be performed rapidly but there are several concerns such as aortic rupture, extension of dissection, and false lumen cannulation. Objective: To compare the establishment time of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and postoperative outcomes of the two cannulation techniques that provide antegrade perfusion, which was direct true lumen cannulation on the dissected ascending aorta using epiaortic ultrasound-guided and axillary artery cannulation in Siriraj Hospital. Materials and Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed all the 30 cases of acute aortic dissection type A using two different cannulation methods performed between February 2011 and May 2017. Direct true lumen ascending aortic cannulation was performed using the epiaortic ultrasound-guide with Seldinger technique in 12 patients, and axillary artery cannulation was performed in 18 patients. Results: The direct true lumen ascending aortic cannulation was safely performed in all patients. None of them had aortic rupture. Skin incision to CPB time was significantly faster in the epiaortic ultrasound-guided ascending aortic cannulation group at 29±8 versus 49±14 minutes (p<0.001). The 30-day mortality and postoperative adverse events, such as ischemic stroke, acute kidney injury, visceral organ and limb malperfusion showed no statistically significant difference from the axillary artery cannulation method. Conclusion: Epiaortic ultrasound-guided true lumen cannulation of ascending aorta in the treatment of acute aortic dissection type A is safe and feasible. Skin incision to CPB time can be performed faster and provided good outcome compared to the axillary artery cannulation technique. Keywords: Acute aortic dissection, Ascending cannulation, Epiaortic ultrasound


Radiology ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 214 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Wook Chung ◽  
Christopher Elkins ◽  
Toyohiko Sakai ◽  
Noriyuki Kato ◽  
Thomas Vestring ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. e0240144
Author(s):  
Hazem El Beyrouti ◽  
Daniel-Sebastian Dohle ◽  
Mohammad Bashar Izzat ◽  
Lena Brendel ◽  
Philipp Pfeiffer ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 4126-4131
Author(s):  
Yangfeng Tang ◽  
Lin Han ◽  
Xinli Fan ◽  
Boyao Zhang ◽  
Jiajun Zhang ◽  
...  

Vascular ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Kotelis ◽  
G Grebe ◽  
P Kraus ◽  
M Müller-Eschner ◽  
M Bischoff ◽  
...  

Aim To identify morphologic factors affecting aortic expansion in patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissections. Methods Computed tomography data of 24 patients (18 male; median age: 61 years), diagnosed with acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissections between 2002 and 2013, were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had at least two computed tomography angiography scans and six months of uneventful follow-up. Computed tomography scans were assessed by two independent readers with regard to presence and number of entry tears. Thoracic and abdominal aortic diameters were derived using image processing software. Results Twenty-two of 24 patients showed aortic expansion over a median computed tomography angiographic follow-up of 33.2 months. Annual rates showed an increase of 1.7 mm for total aortic diameter, 2.1 mm for the false and a decrease of −0.4 mm for the true lumen. In three patients (12.5%), aortic diameter exceeded 60 mm during follow-up, and all three patients underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Patients with a maximum aortic diameter <4 cm at baseline showed a significantly higher expansion rate compared to cases with an initial maximum aortic diameter of ≥4 cm ( p=0.0471). A median of two entries (range: 1–5) was recognized per patient. Presence of more than two entry tears ( n = 13) was associated with faster overall diameter expansion (mean annual rates: 2.18 mm vs. 1.16 mm; p = 0.4556), and decrease of the cross-sectional surface of the true lumen over time (annual rate for > 2 entries vs. ≤2 entries: −7.8 mm2 vs. +37.5 mm2; p = 0.0369). Median size of entry tears was 12 mm (range: 2–53 mm). Conclusions The results presented herein suggest that uncomplicated type B aortic dissection patients with more than two entry tears and/or an initial maximum aortic diameter of<4 cm are at risk for aortic dilatation and, therefore, may require stricter follow-up including the possible need for early intervention.


2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 970-972
Author(s):  
Paul S. Pagel ◽  
Marc S. Eiseman ◽  
Ghulam Murtaza ◽  
Alfred C. Nicolosi

2003 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 948 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angel L. Fernández ◽  
Amparo Martínez ◽  
Julian Alvarez ◽  
José Rubio ◽  
José B. García-Bengochea

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document