Prevention of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants by Antenatal Ambroxol: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (07) ◽  
pp. 529-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi-Qun Zhang ◽  
Qian-Qian Wu ◽  
Xian-Mei Huang ◽  
Hui Lu
2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Long ◽  
Wang Li ◽  
Li Wanwei ◽  
Li Jie ◽  
Shi Yuan

Objectives. To assess whether noninvasive ventilation with Heliox reduces the need for endotracheal ventilation and subsequent complications in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Methods. A search of major electronic databases, including MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, for randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials that compared noninvasive ventilation with Heliox versus noninvasive ventilation with standard gas for preterm infants with RDS was performed. The primary outcome was the incidence of intubation. The secondary outcomes were the level of PaCO2, the use of surfactant, and other complications. Results. Two randomized and one quasi-randomized controlled trials including 123 preterm infants were assessed. Heliox was found to significantly decrease the incidence of intubation (RR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.78), the level of PaCO2 (MD: −9.61; 95% CI: −15.76 to −03.45), and the use of surfactant (RR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.61) as compared with standard gas. No significant differences were found in other secondary outcomes. Conclusions. Noninvasive ventilation with Heliox decreases the incidence of intubation in preterm infants suffering from RDS. However, data on clinical outcomes are limited. Larger trials are needed to verify the beneficial effects.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Zanfeng Cao ◽  
Zhanzheng Yang ◽  
Zijing Liang ◽  
Qingyan Cen ◽  
Zuopeng Zhang ◽  
...  

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of prone versus supine position ventilation for adult acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. The electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched from their inception up to September 2020. The relative risks (RRs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were employed to calculate pooled outcomes using the random-effects models. Twelve randomized controlled trials that had recruited a total of 2264 adults with ARDS were selected for the final meta-analysis. The risk of mortality in patients who received prone position ventilation was 13% lower than for those who received supine ventilation, but this effect was not statistically significant (RR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.75–1.00; P  = 0.055). There were no significant differences between prone and supine position ventilation on the duration of mechanical ventilation (WMD: −0.22; P  = 0.883) or ICU stays (WMD: –0.39; P  = 0.738). The pooled RRs indicate that patients who received prone position ventilation had increased incidence of pressure scores (RR: 1.23; P  = 0.003), displacement of a thoracotomy tube (RR: 3.14; P  = 0.047), and endotracheal tube obstruction (RR: 2.45; P  = 0.001). The results indicated that prone positioning during ventilation might have a beneficial effect on mortality, though incidence of several adverse events was significantly increased for these patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document