Objective Assessment of Surgical Skills in a 2-Day Visceral Anastomosis Techniques Course hold in the Annual Congress of the German Surgical Society (DGCH)

2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (08) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Elhabash ◽  
J Laniewski ◽  
D Zeyse ◽  
AM Baderkhan ◽  
O Akkermann ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-122
Author(s):  
J John ◽  
JH Kuiper ◽  
CP Kelly

INTRODUCTION Surgical skills courses are an important part of learning during surgical training. The assessments at these courses tend to be subjective and anecdotal. Objective assessment using multiple choice questions (MCQs) quantifies the learning experience for both the organisers and the participants. MATERIALS AND METHODS Participants of the open shoulder surgical skills course conducted at The Royal College of Surgeons of England in 2005 and 2006 underwent assessment using MCQs prior to and after the course. RESULTS The participants were grouped as non-consultants (14) and consultant orthopaedic surgeons (8). All participants improved after attending the course. The average improvement was 17% (range, 4–43%). We compared the two groups while adjusting for the association between pre-course score and score gain. We found a strong correlation between pre-course score and score gain (r = 0.734; P = 0.001). Adjusted for pre-course score, we found that the score gain (learning) for the non-consultants was slightly larger than for the consultants, but this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.247). CONCLUSIONS All participants had a positive learning experience which did not have a significant correlation to the grade of surgeon.


2010 ◽  
Vol 97 (7) ◽  
pp. 972-987 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. D. van Hove ◽  
G. J. M. Tuijthof ◽  
E. G. G. Verdaasdonk ◽  
L. P. S. Stassen ◽  
J. Dankelman

Author(s):  
Quentin Berl ◽  
Noémie Resseguier ◽  
Maria Katsogiannou ◽  
Franck Mauviel ◽  
Xavier Carcopino ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
pp. 619-649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob Rosen ◽  
Mika Sinanan ◽  
Blake Hannaford

2003 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Moody ◽  
Chris Baber ◽  
Theodoros N. Arvanitis ◽  
Martin Elliott

Surgical skills are traditionally assessed through subjective evaluation with experienced surgeons observing and rating trainee activity. However, this process can be expensive, particularly in terms of the time required of expert surgeons. Subjective assessment may also suffer from problems of intersubject variation in the application of evaluation criteria. Computer-based training, in particular systems combining virtual reality interfaces with haptic displays, offers a means of providing both automated and objective assessment of performance. In this paper we propose that, prior to the development of such systems, there is a need to determine measures that can adequately differentiate levels of performance. The paper therefore discusses the evaluation of surgical technique using objective metrics. Two main questions are addressed. How can surgical technique be assessed? What metrics prove useful in defining and modifying surgical skills and techniques?


Author(s):  
Carlos Brandão ◽  
Luis Roberto Dallan ◽  
Fabrício Dinato ◽  
Rosangela Monteiro ◽  
Alfredo Fiorelli ◽  
...  

Objectives: The goal of this study was to describe and evaluate our simulation training program on biological models for the cardiovascular surgery residency program at our institution. Material and Methods: Since 2016, with the purpose to develop better practical performance and evaluate the improvement of resident’s surgical skills, it was implemented a simulation training program, composed of some elemental procedures in cardiovascular surgery. It was established one wet lab session weekly lasting 2 hours, coached by 2 expert cardiovascular surgeons. Bovine and porcine hearts were used as biological models. At the end of the hands on program, an objective assessment consisting of 2 practical modules was applied and performance was rated by way of a 5-point scale. In addition, to provide a subjective assessment, each resident filled out a questionnaire consisting of 3 items reviewing the overall quality of the workshops on a 10-point scale. Results: The objective evaluation applied at the end of the training program consisted by valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) modules. The mean performance rating scores for valve replacement module ranged from 4.2 to 4.79, and to CABG, from 4.33 to 4.87. Regarding subjective assessment, all items evaluated, such as expert’s didactics, simulation performance and biological simulator fidelity, received high grades (above 9 on a 10-point scale). Conclusions: Simulator training on biological models for cardiac surgery medical residents is a simple and effective learning method of surgical skills.


2008 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 270-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azhar Rafiq ◽  
Francisco Tamariz ◽  
Cosmin Boanca ◽  
Vladimir Lavrentyev ◽  
Ronald C. Merrell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document