The Preparation of an Artificial Reagent for the One-Stage Factor VIII Assay

1970 ◽  
Vol 23 (02) ◽  
pp. 306-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Nyman
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Artificial Substrate ◽  
One Stage ◽  
The One

SummaryA method for preparation of an artificial substrate for the one-stage factor VIII assay is described. Standardization of the test is given. The method is specific and reproducible.

Standardization of Factor VIII – IV. Establishment of the 3rd International Standard for Factor VIII: C Concentrate

1983 ◽  
Vol 50 (03) ◽  
pp. 697-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
T W Barrowcliffe ◽  
A D Curtis ◽  
D P Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
High Purity ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
World Health ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
International Standard ◽  
One Stage ◽  
The One ◽  
Health Organization

SummaryAn international collaborative study was carried out to establish a replacement for the current (2nd) international standard for Factor VIII: C, concentrate. Twenty-six laboratories took part, of which 17 performed one-stage assays, three performed two-stage assays and six used both methods. The proposed new standard, an intermediate purity concentrate, was assayed against the current standard, against a high-purity concentrate and against an International Reference Plasma, coded 80/511, previously calibrated against fresh normal plasma.Assays of the proposed new standard against the current standard gave a mean potency of 3.89 iu/ampoule, with good agreement between laboratories and between one-stage and two- stage assays. There was also no difference between assay methods in the comparison of high-purity and intermediate purity concentrates. In the comparison of the proposed standard with the plasma reference preparation, the overall mean potency was 4.03 iu/ampoule, but there were substantial differences between laboratories, and the two-stage method gave significantly higher results than the one stage method. Of the technical variables in the one-stage method, only the activation time with one reagent appeared to have any influence on the results of this comparison of concentrate against plasma.Accelerated degradation studies showed that the proposed standard is very stable. With the agreement of the participants, the material, in ampoules coded 80/556, has been established by the World Health Organization as the 3rd International Standard for Factor VIII :C, Concentrate, with an assigned potency of 3.9 iu/ampoule.

scholarly journals Identification of Sources of Inter-Laboratory Variation in Factor VIII Assay

1977 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.B.L. Kirkwood ◽  
C.R. Rizza ◽  
T.J. Snape ◽  
I. Rhymes ◽  
D.E.G. Austen
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Systematic Difference ◽  
Normal System ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Initial Dilution ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Collaborative Studies ◽  
Freeze Dried ◽  
Sources Of Variation ◽  
The One

A repeated finding of national and international collaborative studies of standard Factor VIII preparations has been that systematic differences exist between laboratories in their measurement of the relative activities of the same pairs of Factor VIII preparations.A workshop meeting was held at the Oxford Haemophilia Centre (England) during 23rd-26th November 1976 to investigate which of the possible sources of variation between laboratories were responsible. Participants from 16 British laboratories (9 one-stage, 7 two-stage) performed a total of 273 assays using three freeze-dried preparations of differing purity (a plasma, an intermediate and a high purity concentrate). The results of assays with each participant using their normal system established that, if the participants were a representative cross-section, approximately one-third of one-stage laboratories would show a systematic difference from the overall mean of at least 16%, with a similar figure for the two-stage laboratories of 9%. Various features of the assay systems were then modified in a controlled series of experiments. The results showed conclusively that i) differences between reagents accounted for most of the variation between laboratories and, ii) the two-stage assays were, on average, detecting relatively more activity in the more purified preparations than the one-stage assays. The results also suggested that the use of buffer as opposed to haemophilic plasma for the initial dilution of concentrates did not affect the assay results.

scholarly journals Assessing the Performance of Extended Half-Life Coagulation Factor VIII, FC Fusion Protein by Using Chromogenic and One-Stage Assays in Saudi Hemophilia A Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Tarek M. Owaidah ◽  
Hazzaa A. Alzahrani ◽  
Nouf S. Al-Numair ◽  
Abdulmjeed O. Alnosair ◽  
Amelita M. Aguilos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Half Life ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Coagulation Factor ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Chromogenic Assay ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Mean Differences ◽  
The One

Background. The one-stage assay is the most common method to measure factor VIII activity (FVIII : C) in hemophilia A patients. The chromogenic assay is another two-stage test involving purified coagulation factors followed by factor Xa-specific chromogenic substrate. Aim. This study aimed to assess the discrepancy and correlation between the chromogenic and one-stage assays in measuring FVIII : C levels in hemophilia patients receiving Extended Half-Life Elocta® as a recombinant extended half-life coagulation factor. Methods. We performed a study comparing the measurements of FVIII : C levels by the chromogenic versus the one-stage assays at different drug levels. Data of FVIII : C levels, dosage, and the time interval from administration to measurement were retrieved from the hospital records. The correlation, mean differences, and discrepancy between the two assays were calculated. The linear regression analysis was used to predict the time interval till reaching 1% FVIII : C. Results. Fourteen patients with 56 samples were included in the study. Of them, 13 patients were receiving Elocta® as a prophylactic, while one was receiving Elocta® on demand. One-third of these samples showed a discrepancy between the chromogenic and one-stage assays. The two assays were well correlated. Mean differences were significant at the individual and the time interval level. The time since the last Elocta® injection could significantly predict FVIII : C levels (β = 0.366, P<0.001). Conclusion. Our findings suggested a significant difference between both methods; the FVIII : C levels measured by the one-stage assay were less than those estimated by the chromogenic assay. However, the measurements of FVIII levels by the two assays were well correlated but discrepant in one-third of the samples. The levels of FVIII : C reach 1% after 5.4 days since the last Elocta® administration.

scholarly journals The one‐stage assay or chromogenic assay to monitor baseline factor VIII levels and desmopressin effect in non‐severe haemophilia A: Superiority or non‐inferiority?

Haemophilia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 916-922
Author(s):  
Lisette M. Schütte ◽  
Luca S. Hodes ◽  
Iris Moort ◽  
Sara C. M. Stoof ◽  
Frank W. G. Leebeek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Severe Haemophilia ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Chromogenic Assay ◽  
The One ◽  
Baseline Factor

Some Sources of Error in the One-Stage Assay of Factor VIII

1978 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Susan Elődi ◽  
Katalin Váradi ◽  
Susan R. Hollán
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Sources Of Error ◽  
One Stage ◽  
The One

Validation of a Procedure for Potency Assessing of a High Purity Factor VIII Concentrate -Comparison of Different Factor VIII Coagulant Assays and Effect of Prediluent

1990 ◽  
Vol 64 (02) ◽  
pp. 251-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudine Mazurier ◽  
Armelle Parquet-Gernez ◽  
Maurice Goudemand
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Specific Activity ◽  
Assay Method ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Chromogenic Assay ◽  
Coagulant Activity ◽  
The One ◽  
In Vitro Data

SummaryThe assessment of factor VIII coagulant activity (FVTII: C) in recently available highly purified and concentrated FVTII therapeutic products calls for careful evaluation of assay methodologies. We assayed more than 130 batches of a concentrate with a specific activity of about 150 FVTII :C units/mg protein, using one-stage and two-stage clotting and chromogenic methods. There was good agreement between the potency estimates obtained with the different methods. We also compared the FVTII :C potencies obtained after predilution in buffer or FVIII-deficient plasma using either calibrated plasma or FVTII concentrate as references. With the one-stage assay we found a marked discrepancy between the potency values obtained with buffer and with FVTII-deficient plasma used as prediluents. In order to validate our “in vitro” data we performed 6 “in vivo” analyses in severe haemophilia A patients. On the basis of the overall data obtained we chose to label FVIII potency by using FVIII-deficient plasma as prediluent, reference plasma as standard and the chromogenic assay method.

The Influence of Thrombin on the Clotting Activity of Factor VIII. A Study with Insolubilized Thrombin

1978 ◽  
Vol 39 (03) ◽  
pp. 600-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Th Vukovich ◽  
E Koller ◽  
W Doleschel
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Test Sample ◽  
Test System ◽  
Factor Viii Activity ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Analytical Procedures ◽  
The One

SummaryAn investigation of the influence of thrombin on the clotting activity of factor VIII was made. Purified factor VIII and different amounts of thrombin complexed to Sepharose 4 B were mixed and incubated for various periods of time. The factor VIII activities of these incubation mixtures were determined by the one- and two-stage analytical procedures in the presence of the thrombin-sepharose and in its absence following the latter removal from the test sample by filtration. The results so obtained confirm the view that thrombin inactivates factor VIII. Evidences for a thrombin-induced potentiation of the factor VIII activity, seen only in the thrombin-sepharose containing test samples analyzed by the one-stage method, are here interpreted as thrombin-effects peculiar to this factor VIII test system and not as potentiation by thrombin of the factor itself.

Pharmacokinetic In Vivo Comparison Using 1-Stage and Chromogenic Substrate Assays with Two Formulations of Hemofil-M

1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (06) ◽  
pp. 0950-0956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Lee ◽  
Trevor Barrowcliffe ◽  
Gordon Bray ◽  
Ed Gomperts ◽  
Anthony Hubbard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽  
Chromogenic Substrate ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Chromogenic Assay ◽  
The Usa ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The One

SummaryIn a study to demonstrate the safety and pharmacokinetics (half-life and recovery) of two different method M purified AHF (Hemofil-M) concentrates processed in the USA and Spain, two different methods of factor VIII assay (one-stage clotting and chromogenic) have been compared in vivo. The study was a single centre blinded, randomised, crossover study. Twelve patients with severe haemophilia A (VIII: C <2 u/dl) were divided into two subgroups of six. None had received factor VIII concentrate within 48 h preceding the study. Twenty-four pharmacokinetic studies were performed in the 12 patients. Each subgroup received two different lots of study material (US and Spanish) at a dose of 50 u/kg seven days apart. A second randomisation was nominal potency, high: 1000 u or mid: 500 u per vial. The potency label was a one-stage clotting assay using the mega I standard. A standard pharmacokinetic study was performed over 24 h and each blinded sample was analysed in duplicate by a one-stage clotting (aPTT) and a chromogenic (Chromogenix AB; CS) assay at the Royal Free and NIBSC. Pharmacokinetic modelling was performed. The mean label for Hemofil-M using the chromogenic substrate assay was 79% that using the one stage assay (Mega I standard). The recovery was 17-28% higher measured by chromogenic compared to the clotting assay. Since most clinicians use the clotting assay, potency labelling using the chromogenic assay, will overestimate predicted Hemofil-M recovery by as much as 25%.

In Vivo Recovery of Factor VIII: A Comparison of One-Stage and Two-Stage Assay Methods

1979 ◽  
Vol 42 (04) ◽  
pp. 1230-1239 ◽  
Author(s):  
I M Nilsson ◽  
T B L Kirkwood ◽  
T W Barrowcliffe
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Half Life ◽  
In Vitro Assays ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Assay Methods ◽  
The One ◽  
Fraction I

SummaryThe recovery and half-life of VIII: C in the plasma of severely haemophilic patients was measured by one-stage and two-stage assays after injection of two Factor VIII concentrates (Hemofil, Hyland and Fraction I-O, Kabi). Plasma volumes were measured with an Evans� Blue technique, and both concentrates and post-infusion samples were measured against the same plasma standard.There was a highly significant difference in recoveries estimated by the two assay methods. The one-stage assays gave the most consistent results, in that the average recovery was 100%, whereas the two-stage assays gave only about 80% of the value expected from in vitro assays. There was no difference in recoveries between the two concentrates.The two-stage assays gave a slightly shorter half-life than the one-stage assays, and the half-life of Hemofil was also shorter than that of Fraction I-O.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document