Postoperative Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Predict Motor Recovery after Eloquent Tumor Surgery

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Seidel ◽  
L. Häni ◽  
K. Lutz ◽  
C. Zbinden ◽  
A. Redmann ◽  
...  
2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric P. Bastings ◽  
Jason P. Greenberg ◽  
David C. Good

The respective contributions of the stroke and undamaged hemispheres to motor recovery after stroke remains controversial. The aim of this article is to evaluate the relationship between location and size of cortical motor areas and outcome after stroke. Twelve controls and 12 stroke patients were studied. Hand cortical motor output areas were determined using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Motor-evoked potentials were recorded simultaneously from both hands. Functional motor abilities were evaluated using well-validated measures. Surface area, weighted surface area, and center of gravity of motor output areas were calculated. Different patterns of motor output areas to the paretic hand were observed; there was no motor output from the stroke hemisphere in patients with poor outcome, contrasting to large motor output area in the stroke hemisphere in patients with good outcome, regardless of infarct size or location. A significant correlation was found between measures of motor outcome in the stroke-affected upper extremity and both the surface area and weight of the central motor output area in the stroke hemisphere. No ipsilateral motor response was obtained after stimulation of either hemisphere. These data support an association between preservation of cortical motor output area to the paretic hand in the stroke hemisphere and good motor outcome.


Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukako Takahashi ◽  
Naoya Oishi ◽  
Tatsuya Mima ◽  
Hidenao Fukuyama ◽  
Ryosuke Takahashi ◽  
...  

Introduction: The failure of numerous stroke clinical trials partially lies in the difficulty in predicting motor recovery in the acute phase. Because of the interindividual variability in subsequent recovery, better prediction of motor prognosis and earlier patient stratification are required to design a promising protocol for clinical trials. Recently, an algorithm to predict motor recovery at 2 weeks after stroke has been reported by combining diffusion-weighted MRI and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS); however, 2 weeks may be too late for therapeutic intervention. The aim of this study was therefore to explore how to predict motor recovery even earlier at 1 week after ischemic stroke. Subjects and Methods: Twenty-five patients with acute ischemic stroke (67.9±10.5 years old) who showed supratentorial lesions and hemiparesis of the upper extremity were prospectively enrolled. Integrity of the corticospinal tract was assessed structurally with MRI and functionally with TMS within 7 days after onset (acute phase), at 10-20 days (subacute), and at 6 months (chronic). The fractional anisotropy (FA) asymmetry index (FAcontra-FAipsi)/(FAcontra+FAipsi) at the level of the cerebral peduncle was calculated on MRI, while motor evoked potential (MEP) was recorded on TMS. The Fugl-Meyer scale was used to evaluate upper limb impairment in the subacute and chronic phase. Results: Patients with detectable MEP at 1 week after onset showed significantly higher Fugl-Meyer score at 6 months compared to those without MEP (65.4 versus 33.6, p=0.011). Those with FA asymmetry index of less than 0.024 at 1 week showed significantly higher Fugl-Meyer score at 6 months compared to those with the index above 0.024 (64.2 versus 40.1, p=0.037). Conclusion: Presence of MEP and smaller asymmetry of FA at 1 week after ischemic stroke could be a useful biomarker for predicting better motor recovery. This finding can be useful in earlier patient stratification in future clinical trials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document