Combined David and Frozen Elephant Trunk Procedure in Acute Aortic Dissection

2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (05) ◽  
pp. 372-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nora Goebel ◽  
Ragi Nagib ◽  
Schahriar Salehi-Gilani ◽  
Samir Ahad ◽  
Marc Albert ◽  
...  

Background Valve sparing aortic root repair by reimplantation (David procedure) is an established technique in acute aortic dissection Stanford type A involving the aortic root. In DeBakey type I dissection, aortic arch replacement using the frozen elephant trunk (FET) was introduced to promote aortic remodeling of the downstream aorta. The combination of these two complex procedures represents a challenging surgical strategy and was considered too risky so far. Methods All patients with acute aortic dissection DeBakey type I undergoing valve sparing aortic root repair by reimplantation technique of David combined with extended aortic repair using the FET at our center between October 2009 and December 2016 were evaluated. Outcomes are compared with patients who underwent prosthetic aortic root replacement and FET for aortic dissection in the same timeframe. Results A total of 28 patients received combined David and FET procedure, while 20 patients received prosthetic aortic root replacement and FET procedure. Thirty-day mortality was 10.7% (n = 3) for the David group and 20% (n = 4) for the root replacement group (p = 0.43). Postoperative echocardiographic control revealed an excellent aortic valve function with regurgitation grade 0° or maximum grade I° and a mean gradient of 4.3 ± 2.1 mm Hg in all patients in the David group versus 7.2 ± 2.4 mm Hg in the aortic root replacement group, p = 0.003. Computed tomography angiography scan showed positive aortic remodeling in all but three patients (91.9%). Mid-term follow-up survival was 82.1% in the David group and 68.4% in the root replacement group, p = 0.28. There was no need for reintervention at the root or descending aorta. Conclusion Simultaneous application of the David and FET procedure in patients with acute aortic dissection is safe and feasible in experienced hands as compared with standard aortic root replacement plus FET. The mid-term outcomes are encouraging and noninferior to conventional surgery results.

2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
D.-S. Dohle ◽  
K. Tsagakis ◽  
P. Liubov ◽  
H. Kühl ◽  
H. Lieder ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  

We present a patient with an acute type A aortic dissection that involves the aortic root. The high mortality of patients with this condition is often associated with operations performed by surgeons with minimal experience dealing with aortic diseases. Therefore, less-experienced surgeons often opt for less complicated techniques like supracoronary ascending aortic replacement. However, according to the latest guidelines for the management of aortic diseases, the aortic root should be replaced when it is compromised by the dissection. The Bentall–de Bono technique treats the aortic root and demands less experience than valve-sparing aortic surgery.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hug Aubin ◽  
Payam Akhyari ◽  
Philipp Rellecke ◽  
Christina Pawlitza ◽  
George Petrov ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document