scholarly journals Functional (Psychogenic) Neurological Disorders: Assessment and Acute Management in the Emergency Department

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (01) ◽  
pp. 102-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vihang Nakhate ◽  
Christopher Stephen ◽  
David Perez ◽  
Jordan Anderson

AbstractFunctional neurological disorders (FND) are complex and prevalent neuropsychiatric conditions. Importantly, some patients with FND develop acute onset symptoms requiring emergency department (ED) evaluations. Historically, FND was a “rule-out” diagnosis, making assessment and management in the ED difficult. While the rapid triage of potential neurological emergencies remains the initial task, advancements have altered the approach to FND. FND is now a “rule-in” diagnosis based on validated neurological examination signs and semiological features. In this perspective article, we review signs and semiological features that can help guide the initial assessment of FND in the acute setting. Thereafter, we outline potential approaches to introduce a suspected diagnosis of FND to patients in the ED, while emphasizing the need for a comprehensive neurological evaluation. Physical and occupational therapy may be useful adjunct assessments in some individuals. Notably, clinicians in the ED setting are important members of the interdisciplinary approach to FND.

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Cretton ◽  
Richard J. Brown ◽  
W. Curt LaFrance ◽  
Selma Aybek

1998 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 483-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell A. Powell ◽  
Andrew J. Howell

In a recent study by Ellason and Ross, patients with Dissociative Identity Disorder reported a decrease in symptoms on the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory–II over a 2-yr. follow-up period. Patients judged to have achieved integration of their personalities rated themselves as more substantially improved on the Millon–II than did patients judged not to have achieved integration. Ellason and Ross suggested that this improvement reflected the influence of treatment; however, for several reasons, their findings are open to alternative interpretations. First, in the absence of proper control conditions, one cannot rule out the contribution of other factors to the over-all improvement of patients such as regression of symptoms toward the mean following the initial assessment. Second, patients' self-reported improvement was less substantial when data were reanalyzed using more appropriate statistical criteria. Third, the greater improvement observed among integrated patients relative to nonintegrated patients may reflect influences other than differential responsiveness to treatment, such as less severe pathology prior to treatment. More systematic research is needed to clarify the effect of treatment on Dissociative Identity Disorder.


2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. s1-s1
Author(s):  
Richard Siau ◽  
Steven Young ◽  
Melissa Blyth ◽  
Kirsty Dickson-Jardine

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document