Neutrophil–Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of Venous Thromboembolism after Total Knee Replacement

Author(s):  
Won-Woo Seo ◽  
Myung-Soo Park ◽  
Sung Eun Kim ◽  
Jun-Hee Lee ◽  
Dae-Gyun Park ◽  
...  

AbstractVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is a potentially serious complication after total knee replacement (TKR), and recent guideline recommends thromboprophylaxis for VTE after TKR. The neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has emerged as a simple and new prognostic biomarker for several cardiovascular diseases. This study was performed to investigate the precise incidence of postoperative VTE and the role of NLR for predicting VTE in patients receiving thromboprophylaxis after TKR. We retrospectively enrolled 264 patients undergoing TKR who underwent routine screening enhanced pulmonary artery and lower extremity venography computed tomography (CT) scan within 7 postoperative days. Biochemical tests were performed within 2 weeks prior to surgery, and the NLR was defined as the absolute neutrophil count in peripheral blood divided by lymphocyte count. All patients received thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin postoperatively. Of 264 patients, 102 (38.6%) were diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism on CT scan. Preoperative NLR was significantly higher in patients with postoperative VTE compared with that in patients without VTE (2.57 ± 1.59 vs. 2.11 ± 1.10, p = 0.011). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that a preoperative NLR of 1.90 was the best cutoff value for the prediction of postoperative VTE (sensitivity 57.8%, specificity 55.6%, and area under curve 0.589). In the multivariate analysis, a preoperative NLR ≥1.90 was a sole independent predictor of postoperative VTE (odds ratio: 1.95, 95% computed tomography: 1.16–3.31, p = 0.013). The present study shows a higher incidence of VTE (38.6%) after TKR in patients receiving thromboprophylaxis than that reported in previous studies. Furthermore, preoperative NLR was significantly higher in patients with postoperative VTE, and a high preoperative NLR (≥1.90) was an independent predictor of VTE after TKR. NLR measurement may be a simple and useful method for the prediction of VTE in patients undergoing TKR.

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M.S. Park ◽  
W.W. Seo ◽  
S.E. Kim ◽  
J.H. Lee ◽  
D.G. Park ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ethan Toner ◽  
Tobenna Oputa ◽  
Heather Robinson ◽  
Olivia McCabe-Robinson ◽  
Andrew Sloan

Abstract Background Serum D-dimer is frequently used to rule out a diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE), a recognised complication following total knee replacement (TKR). TKR is known to cause a rise in D-dimer levels, reducing its specificity. Previous studies have demonstrated that D-dimer remains elevated within 10 days of TKR and therefore should be avoided. The aim of this study was to determine whether serum D-dimer tests are clinically appropriate in identifying VTE when performed within 28 days of TKR. Methods Case notes for patients who had a serum D-dimer test performed for clinically suspected VTE at ≥ 28 days following TKR were retrospectively reviewed for a 6-year period. Demographics, D-dimer result, time after surgery and further radiological investigations were recorded. Results Fifty patients underwent D-dimer tests at ≥ 28 days following surgery (median 60 days, range 29–266); 48 of these patients had a positive result. Of these, five had confirmed VTE on radiological investigations. Serum D-dimer was raised in 96% of the patients. Only 10.42% of these patients had confirmed VTE. No patients with negative D-dimers had confirmed VTE. Conclusions These findings suggest that serum D-dimer remains raised for at least 28 days and possibly considerably longer following TKR. Serum D-dimer should not be used in patients with clinically suspected VTE within this period because of its unacceptably low specificity of 4.44% and positive predictive value of 10.42%, which can lead to a delay in necessary further radiological investigations, waste of resources and unnecessary exposure to harm.


2002 ◽  
Vol 105 (5) ◽  
pp. 371-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bengt I Eriksson ◽  
Mats Ögren ◽  
Ulf G Eriksson ◽  
Peter Kälebo ◽  
Lennart Ahnfelt ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 152 (5) ◽  
pp. S261
Author(s):  
Yuchen Wang ◽  
Harry Fuentes ◽  
Luis Paz Rios ◽  
Diana Oramas ◽  
William Trick ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (13) ◽  
pp. 885-894 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jes??s Honorato ◽  
Antonio G??mez-Outes ◽  
Antonio Navarro-Quilis ◽  
Javier Mart??nez-Gonz??lez ◽  
Eduardo Rocha ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document