scholarly journals Third head of sternocleidomastoid muscle

2013 ◽  
Vol 02 (04) ◽  
pp. 218-220
Author(s):  
Anjali Satyen Sabnis ◽  
Shaguphta T Shaikh ◽  
Rakhi Milind More

AbstractDuring routine dissection in the neck region, a third head of sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscle was found unilaterally in one cadaver and bilaterally in another cadaver. In both the cases third head was supplied by the spinal accessory nerve. SCM is most prominent muscle in the neck region which is used as important landmark during teaching living anatomy and gross anatomy of triangles of neck to students. As many important nerves and vessels are related to this key muscle of neck, any variation in relation to its origin, insertion and nerve supply attracts the attention of surgeons and anatomists. Embryological basis and clinical significance was discussed in these two cases of unilateral and bilateral presence of third head of SCM.

1975 ◽  
Vol 84 (6) ◽  
pp. 812-816 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. H. Saunders ◽  
E. W. Johnson

After classical radical neck dissection with removal of the sternocleidomastoid muscle and division of the spinal accessory nerve, there are certain disabling or disagreeable musculoskeletal defects. This paper describes the muscular deficiencies and gives a set of exercises which can be counted on to minimize the problems.


2005 ◽  
Vol 119 (11) ◽  
pp. 906-908 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Tatla ◽  
J Kanagalingam ◽  
A Majithia ◽  
P M Clarke

Iatrogenic injury to the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) during neck dissection may result in significant and avoidable morbidity in the form of ’shoulder syndrome’. The authors describe a simple method, based on the anatomy of the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM), which allows consistent and rapid identification of the SAN in the upper neck during dissection, thereby facilitating its preservation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
ThomasMombo Amuti ◽  
Fawzia Butt ◽  
BedaOlabu Otieno ◽  
JuliusAlexander Ogeng'o

The spinal accessory nerve (SAN) exhibits variant anatomy in its relation to the internal jugular vein (IJV) as well as the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM). These variations are important in locating the nerve during surgical neck procedures to avoid its inadvertent injury. These variations, however, are not conserved among different populations and data from the Kenyan setting are partly elucidated. This study, therefore, aims to determine the variant anatomical relationship of the SAN to the SCM and IJV in a select Kenyan population. Forty cadaveric necks were studied bilaterally during routine dissection and the data collected were analyzed using SPSS version 21. Means and modes were calculated for the point of entry of the SAN into the posterior triangle of the neck as well as for its relation to the SCM. Side variations for both of these were analyzed using Student's t-test. Data relating the SAN to the IJV were represented in percentages and side variations were analyzed using the chi-square test. The SAN point of entry into the posterior triangle of the neck was 5.38 cm (3.501–8.008 cm) on the left side and 5.637 cm (3.504–9.173 cm) on the right side ( p = 0.785) from the mastoid process. The nerve perforated the SCM in four cases (10%) on the left side and in eight cases (20%) on the right ( p = 0.253). The SAN lay predominantly medial to the IJV on both sides of the neck, 87.5% on the left side of the neck versus 82.5% on the right ( p = 0.831). In conclusion, the variant relation of the SAN to the IJV and SCM as observed in this setting is an important consideration during radical neck procedures and node biopsies.


BMJ ◽  
1879 ◽  
Vol 1 (945) ◽  
pp. 212-212
Author(s):  
W. Rivington

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document