Evaluation of Graft Tensioning Effects in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction between Hamstring and Bone–Patellar Tendon Bone Autografts

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven F. DeFroda ◽  
Naga Padmini Karamchedu ◽  
Ross Budacki ◽  
Taylor Wiley ◽  
Paul D. Fadale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Social Functioning ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Bodily Pain ◽  
Graft Tension ◽  
High Tension ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Low Tension

AbstractThis article investigates the clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction patients over 7 years to determine the effects of initial graft tension on outcomes when using patellar tendon (bone–tendon–bone [BTB]) and hamstring tendon (HS) autografts. Ninety patients, reconstructed with BTB or HS, were randomized using two initial graft tension protocols: (1) normal anteroposterior (AP) laxity (“low-tension”; n = 46) and (2) AP laxity overconstrained by 2 mm (“high-tension”; n = 44). Seventy-two patients had data available at 7 years, with 9 excluded for graft failure. Outcomes included the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Short-Form-36 (SF-36), and Tegner activity scale. Clinical outcomes included KT-1000S and International Knee Documentation Committee examination score; and functional outcomes included 1-leg hop distance and peak knee extensor torque. Imaging outcomes included medial joint space width, Osteoarthritis Research Society International radiographic score, and Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Score. There were significantly improved outcomes in the high-tension compared with the low-tension HS group for SF-36 subset scores for bodily pain (p = 0.012), social functioning (p = 0.004), and mental health (p = 0.014) 84 months postsurgery. No significant differences in any outcome were found within the BTB groups. Tegner activity scores were also significantly higher for the high-tension HS group compared with the low-tension (6.0 vs. 3.8, p = 0.016). Patients with HS autografts placed in high tension had better outcomes relative to low tension for Tegner activity score and SF-36 subset scores for bodily pain, social functioning, and mental health. For this reason, we recommend that graft fixation be performed with the knee at 30-degree flexion (“high-tension” condition) when reconstructing the ACL with HS autograft.

scholarly journals Effect of Matching or Overconstraining Knee Laxity During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Knee Osteoarthritis and Clinical Outcomes

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (7) ◽  
pp. 1660-1670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Akelman ◽  
Paul D. Fadale ◽  
Michael J. Hulstyn ◽  
Robert M. Shalvoy ◽  
Arlene Garcia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Graft Tension ◽  
High Tension ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Radiographic Score ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Low Tension

Background: The “initial graft tension” applied at the time of graft fixation during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery modulates joint contact mechanics, which in turn may promote posttraumatic osteoarthritis (OA). Purpose/Hypotheses: The study objectives were to compare clinical, functional, patient-reported, and OA imaging outcomes between 2 different initial laxity-based graft tension cohorts and a matched uninjured control group as well as to evaluate the effects of laxity-based graft tension on OA development at 84-month follow-up. The 2 laxity-based tension protocols were (1) to restore normal anteroposterior (AP) laxity at the time of surgery relative to the contralateral uninjured knee (low-tension group) or (2) to overconstrain AP laxity by 2 mm relative to the contralateral uninjured knee (high-tension group). The hypotheses were that (1) the high-tension group would have improved outcomes and decreased OA compared with the low-tension group after 84 months, and (2) the outcomes for the high-tension group would be equivalent to those for an age-, sex-, race-, and activity-matched group of control participants with uninjured knees. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Patients had their ACLs reconstructed with either a bone–patellar tendon–bone or 4-stranded hamstring autograft, and outcomes were compared with a matched control group. Outcomes were evaluated preoperatively and at 60 and 84 months postoperatively and included clinical (KT-1000 arthrometer AP laxity measurement and International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] examination score), functional (1-legged hop for distance and knee extensor torque), patient-reported (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], Short Form–36 [SF-36], and patient satisfaction survey), and OA imaging (measurement of joint space width [JSW], Osteoarthritis Research Society International [OARSI] radiographic score, and Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score [WORMS]) components. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were used to evaluate differences in outcomes between the treatment groups and the control group. Results: There were significant differences between the 2 tension groups in 1 of 5 KOOS subscales (sports and recreation; P = .04) and 2 of 8 SF-36 subscales (vitality, mental health; P < .04) at 84 and 60 months, respectively. Both tension groups scored significantly worse than the control group in the IKDC examination ( P < .001), 1-legged hop ( P ≤ .017), KOOS quality of life and symptoms subscales ( P < .03), and OARSI radiographic score ( P ≤ .02) at 84 months. The low-tension group performed significantly worse than the control group on the KOOS pain subscale ( P = .03), SF-36 general health and social functioning ( P < .04), OARSI radiographic score ( P < .001), and WORMS ( P = .001), while the high-tension group had statistically different results than the control group in AP knee laxity ( P < .001), radiographic JSW ( P = .003), and OARSI radiographic score ( P = .02) as well as significantly more subsequent knee injuries ( P = .02) at 84 months. Conclusion: The results do not support the hypotheses that the high-tension group would have improved outcomes when compared with the low-tension group after 84 months of healing or that the outcomes for the high-tension group would be equivalent to those for the matched control group. While there were minor differences in patient-reported outcomes between the 2 laxity-based tension groups, all other outcomes were similar. Registration: NCT00434837

scholarly journals The Effect of Initial Graft Tension After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Braden C. Fleming ◽  
Paul D. Fadale ◽  
Michael J. Hulstyn ◽  
Robert M. Shalvoy ◽  
Heidi L. Oksendahl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Cartilage Damage ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Graft Tension ◽  
High Tension ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Low Tension

Background: The initial graft tension applied at the time of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction alters joint contact and may influence cartilage health. The objective was to compare outcomes between 2 commonly used “laxity-based” initial graft tension protocols. Hypotheses: (1) The high-tension group would have less knee laxity, improved clinical and patient-oriented outcomes, and less cartilage damage than would the low-tension group after 36 months of healing. (2) The outcomes of the high-tension group would be equivalent to those of a matched control group. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Ninety patients with isolated unilateral ACL injuries were randomized to undergo ACL reconstruction using 1 of 2 initial graft tension protocols: (1) autografts tensioned to restore normal anterior-posterior (AP) laxity at the time of surgery (ie, low tension; n = 46) and (2) autografts tensioned to overconstrain AP laxity by 2 mm (ie, high tension; n = 44). Sixty matched healthy patients formed the control group. Outcomes were assessed preoperatively, intraoperatively, and at 6, 12, and 36 months after surgery. Results: No significant differences were found between the 2 initial graft tension protocols for any of the outcome measures at 36 months. However, there were differences when comparing the 2 treatment groups to the control group. On average, AP laxity was 2 mm greater in the ACL-reconstructed groups than in the control group ( P < .007). International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) knee evaluation scores, peak isokinetic knee extension torques, and 4 of 5 Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) were significantly worse than the control group ( P < .001, P < .027, and P < .05, respectively). Short Form–36 Health Survey (SF-36) scores and reinjury rates were similar between groups at 36 months. Although there were significant changes in radiography and magnetic resonance imaging present in the ACL-reconstructed knees of both treatment groups, the magnitude was relatively small and likely clinically insignificant at 36 months. Conclusion: Both laxity-based initial graft tension protocols produced similar outcomes without fully restoring joint function or patient-oriented outcomes (KOOS) when compared with the control group. There was minimal evidence of cartilage damage 36 months after surgery.

scholarly journals Performance of the PROMIS in Patients After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 232596711877450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth J. Scott ◽  
Robert Westermann ◽  
Nathalie A. Glass ◽  
Carolyn Hettrich ◽  
Brian R. Wolf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Floor Effects ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Pro Instruments

Background: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is designed to advance patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments by utilizing question banks for major health domains. Purpose: To compare the responsiveness and construct validity of the PROMIS physical function computer adaptive test (PF CAT) with current PRO instruments for patients before and up to 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Initially, 157 patients completed the PROMIS PF CAT, Short Form–36 Health Survey (SF-36 physical function [PF] and general health [GH]), Marx Activity Rating Scale (MARS), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS activities of daily living [ADL], sport, and quality of life [QOL]), and EuroQol–5 dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D) at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 2 years after ACL reconstruction. Correlations between instruments, ceiling and floor effects, effect sizes (Cohen d), and standardized response means to describe responsiveness were evaluated. Subgroup analyses compared participants with and without additional arthroscopic procedures using linear mixed models. Results: At baseline, 6 weeks, and 6 months, the PROMIS PF CAT showed excellent or excellent-good correlations with the SF-36 PF ( r = 0.75-0.80, P < .01), KOOS-ADL ( r = 0.63-0.70, P < .01), and KOOS-sport ( r = 0.32-0.69, P < .01); excellent-good correlation with the EQ-5D ( r = 0.60-0.71, P < .01); and good correlation with the KOOS-QOL ( r = 0.52-0.58, P < .01). As expected, there were poor correlations with the MARS ( r = 0.00-0.24, P < .01) and SF-36 GH ( r = 0.16-0.34, P < .01 ). At 2 years, the PROMIS PF CAT showed good to excellent correlations with all PRO instruments ( r = 0.42-0.72, P < .01), including the MARS ( r = 0.42, P < .01), indicating frequent return to preinjury function. The PROMIS PF CAT had the fewest ceiling or floor effects of all instruments tested, and patients answered, on average, 4 questions. There was no significant difference in baseline physical function scores between subgroups; at follow-up, all groups showed improvements in scores that were not statistically different. Conclusion: The PROMIS PF CAT is a valid tool to assess outcomes after ACL reconstruction up to 2 years after surgery, demonstrating the highest responsiveness to change with the fewest ceiling and floor effects and a low time burden among all instruments tested. The PROMIS PF CAT is a beneficial alternative for assessing physical function in adults before and after ACL reconstruction.

An Implantable Transducer for Measuring Tension in an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft

1998 ◽  
Vol 120 (3) ◽  
pp. 327-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. P. Ventura ◽  
J. Wolchok ◽  
M. L. Hull ◽  
S. M. Howell
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Measurement Accuracy ◽  
Femoral Tunnel ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Fixation Device ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft ◽  
Graft Tension ◽  
Load Cells ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

The goal of this study was to develop a new implantable transducer for measuring anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft tension postoperatively in patients who have undergone ACL reconstructive surgery. A unique approach was taken of integrating the transducer into a femoral fixation device. To devise a practical in vivo calibration protocol for the fixation device transducer (FDT), several hypotheses were investigated: (1) The use of a cable versus the actual graft as the means for applying load to the FDT during calibration has no significant effect on the accuracy of the FDT tension measurements; (2) the number of flexion angles at which the device is calibrated has no significant effect on the accuracy of the FDT measurements; (3) the friction between the graft and femoral tunnel has no significant effect on measurement accuracy. To provide data for testing these hypotheses, the FDT was first calibrated with both a cable and a graft over the full range of flexion. Then graft tension was measured simultaneously with both the FDT on the femoral side and load cells, which were connected to the graft on the tibial side, as five cadaver knees were loaded externally. Measurements were made with both standard and overdrilled tunnels. The error in the FDT tension measurements was the difference between the graft tension measured by the FDT and the load cells. Results of the statistical analyses showed that neither the means of applying the calibration load, the number of flexion angles used for calibration, nor the tunnel size had a significant effect on the accuracy of the FDT. Thus a cable may be used instead of the graft to transmit loads to the FDT during calibration, thus simplifying the procedure. Accurate calibration requires data from just three flexion angles of 0, 45, and 90 deg and a curve fit to obtain a calibration curve over a continuous range of flexion within the limits of this angle group. Since friction did not adversely affect the measurement accuracy of the FDT, the femoral tunnel can be drilled to match the diameter of the graft and does not need to be overdrilled. Following these procedures, the error in measuring graft tension with the FDT averages less than 10 percent relative to a full-scale load of 257 N.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Adjustable Loop Suspensory Anterior Cruciate Ligament Fixation Devices

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 505-507
Author(s):  
Mira Dreier ◽  
Samuel Bachmayer ◽  
Christian Baumgartner ◽  
Jörg Schröttner
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Healing Process ◽  
Bone Tunnel ◽  
Test Series ◽  
Fixation Device ◽  
Test Protocol ◽  
Graft Tension ◽  
Fixation Devices ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

AbstractAlong with increasing enthusiasm for sports comes an increase of sport related injuries. One of the most common injuries in the human knee is the tear of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). The selection of a graft fixation device is an important factor that determines the outcome of an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Before the healing process is completed, the graft is dependent on tibial and femoral fixation devices to maintain normal ACL graft tension. Among various devices, the use of an adjustable loop suspensory fixation device (ALD) in soft-tissue graft reconstruction attracts current interest. An advantage of the ALD is the ability to draw the graft to the depth of the bone tunnel to achieve adequate graft tension while minimizing the empty space in the tunnel. In this study a comprehensive controlled laboratory investigation is performed to examine the biomechanical properties of commonly used cortical fixation devices, with the aim of implementing a standard testing procedure for adjustable loop devices. The procedure consists of three test series, a loop shortening test and two different stability test series (singe device and tendon device test). Those test series are used to compare the performance of a new ALD from Arthrex (Naples, USA) with five competitor devices already on the market. In order to obtain representative results eight samples of each device are tested. In comparison to the previously performed studies, a complete unloading is applied in the stability tests, which allows for a detailed examination of the ALDs locking mechanisms in dynamically loaded test situations. Furthermore, the performed loop shortening tests reveal important aspects, such as the shortening accuracy and settling effects of the loops, that are not found in previous studies. Therefore, the used test protocol can be recommended for further testing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document