scholarly journals Thumb Metacarpophalangeal Joint Ulnar Collateral Ligament: Early Outcomes of Suture Anchor Repair with Suture Tape Augmentation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaan S. Patel ◽  
Michael Hachadorian ◽  
Amber Gordon ◽  
Jason Nydick ◽  
Michael Garcia
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Suture Anchor ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Suture Anchors ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Joint Flexion ◽  
Suture Anchor Repair ◽  
Suture Tape

Abstract Introduction The purpose of this study was to evaluate the early outcomes of thumb metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) repair using suture anchors with suture tape augmentation. Materials and Methods Six patients underwent thumb UCL repair or reconstruction with suture tape augmentation and six patients underwent thumb UCL repair with intraosseous suture anchors between January 2013 and January 2018. The main outcome measures were range of motion, strength, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and complications. Results At final follow-up for patients who had suture tape augmentation, the average thumb MCP joint and interphalangeal (IP) joint flexion were 65 and 73 degrees, respectively. The average DASH score was 4.3. At final follow-up for patients who had intraosseous suture anchor repair, the average thumb MCP joint and IP joint flexion were 50 and 60 degrees, respectively. The average DASH score was 38. There were no complications or secondary procedures in either group. Conclusion The use of suture anchor repair with suture tape augmentation for thumb UCL injuries is a treatment option that allows for early range of motion with satisfactory early outcomes that are comparable to intraosseous suture anchor repair. Level of Evidence This is a level IV, case series article.

scholarly journals Clinical results of the BoneWelding®Fiji® anchor for the treatment of Stener lesions of the thumb

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Kastenberger ◽  
Peter Kaiser ◽  
Gernot Schmidle ◽  
Kerstin Stock ◽  
Stefan Benedikt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Traumatic Event ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽  
Metacarpophalangeal Joint ◽  
Contralateral Side ◽  
Pinch Strength ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Collateral Ligament

Abstract Introduction A new technology (Sportwelding®) was recently presented, which uses ultrasonic energy to meld a resorbable suture anchor at the interface with the host bone. A standardized clinical use was not investigated yet. This study prospectively evaluated the surgical and clinical outcomes of the Fiji Anchor® (Sportwelding®, Schlieren, Switzerland) in the repair of an ulnar collateral ligament lesion of the metacarpophalangeal joint of the thumb. Material and methods The range of motion, grip and pinch strength, disability of arm, shoulder and the hand (DASH) and patient rated evaluation (PRWE) score, pain, satisfaction, complications and adverse events were assessed in 24 patients after surgical treatment for an acute displaced rupture or avulsion of the ulnar collateral metacarpophalangeal ligament of the thumb using the Fiji Anchor® after 6, 12 and 52 weeks. Results At final follow up, the range of motion of the metacarpophalangeal joint reached almost the contralateral side (49.3° SD 11.7°). Thumb opposition showed a Kapandji score of 9.7 (SD 0.5; range 9–10). Grip strength, the lateral, tip and the three jaw pinch showed nearly similar values compared to the contralateral side (83–101%). Pain was low (0.2 SD 0.7 at rest and 0.6 SD 1.0 during load). The DASH score was 5.0 (SD 7.3) and the PRWE score was 4.1 (SD 9.0). 81% of patients were very satisfied at final follow-up. Two patients were rated unstable during the follow-up period due to a second traumatic event. Three cases experienced difficulties during anchor insertion, whereby incorrect anchor insertion resulted in damage to the suture material; however, this was resolved after additional training. Conclusion One advantage of this anchor appears to be its stable fixation in cancellous bone. The surgical treatment of an ulnar collateral ligament lesion of the thumb using the Fiji Anchor® can lead to an excellent clinical outcome with a minor complication rate; however, long-term dangers and the cost effectiveness of the procedure are not known yet.

Suture Anchor Repair of Chronic Radial Ligament Injuries of the Metacarpophalangeal Joint of the Thumb

1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. P. McDERMOTT ◽  
L. S. LEVIN
Keyword(s):  
Suture Anchor ◽  
Metacarpophalangeal Joint ◽  
Ligament Injury ◽  
Pinch Strength ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Chronic Instability ◽  
Radial Collateral Ligament ◽  
Suture Anchor Repair ◽  
Thumb Metacarpophalangeal Joint

Five cases of chronic instability of the radial collateral ligament of the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint are presented. All patients were treated using the Mitek suture anchor to reattach the avulsed ligament to bone in its anatomical position. Tendon advancement or graft reinforcement was not used in conjunction with the repair. A stable thumb metacarpophalangeal joint was achieved in each case with no recurrent instability or pain found within 9 months of follow-up. Postoperatively, each patient exhibited a full return to activities of daily living within 2 to 3.5 months. Grip and pinch strength and range of motion were nearly the same as in the uninjured hand. We recommend the Mitek suture anchor as a simple and effective method of repairing the chronic radial collateral ligament injury. The importance of correct anatomical placement of the anchor is stressed, and guidelines for this are discussed.

Return to Football and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes After Thumb Ulnar Collateral Ligament Suture Anchor Repair in Collegiate Athletes

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 1992-1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian C. Werner ◽  
Michael M. Hadeed ◽  
Matthew L. Lyons ◽  
Joshua S. Gluck ◽  
David R. Diduch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Suture Anchor ◽  
Collegiate Athletes ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Ligament Suture ◽  
Suture Anchor Repair

Thumb Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair with Suture Tape Augmentation

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (01) ◽  
pp. 32-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven J. Lee ◽  
Remy V. Rabinovich ◽  
Andrew Kim
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Outcome ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽  
Pinch Strength ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Joint Range Of Motion ◽  
One Year ◽  
Joint Range ◽  
Suture Tape

Background: The purpose of this study is to describe our technique of thumb ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) repair with suture tape augmentation and to evaluate the short-term outcomes in our initial series of patients treated with this method of repair. Methods: Patients with minimum one-year follow up after isolated UCL repair with suture tape augmentation were contacted for clinical evaluation, radiographs, and postoperative outcome questionnaires, including the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire and study-specific questions. Thirteen of 15 (87%) consecutive patients who were treated using this method of repair were available for follow-up, 9 with acute tears and 4 with chronic tears. Results: Average post-operative thumb metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and interphalangeal (IP) joint range-of-motion (ROM) was 0–57.5° and 0–71°, respectively, for chronic tears and 2.2–53.9° and 0–71°, respectively, for acute tears. Average grip and pinch strength relative to the unaffected hand was 102% and 84%, respectively, among patients with chronic tears and 103.3% and 88.7%, respectively, among those with acute tears. All patients demonstrated stability with a firm endpoint, relative to the unaffected thumb. The average QuickDASH score among all patients was 11.9 for the disability/symptom module, 0 for the sport module and 16.5 for the work module. Stiffness was reported among 4 patients and no patient suffered wound-related issues or other complications. Conclusions: Thumb UCL repair with suture tape augmentation demonstrates short-term outcomes comparable to what has been reported for other methods of repair. It may potentially allow for an expedited recovery and rehabilitation process.

The 2.5 mm PushLock suture anchor system versus a traditional suture anchor for ulnar collateral ligament injuries of the thumb: a biomechanical study

2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. D. Jarrett ◽  
G. R. Mcgillivary ◽  
W. C. Hutton
Keyword(s):  
Cyclic Loading ◽  
Suture Anchor ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽  
Suture Anchors ◽  
Gap Formation ◽  
Ligament Injuries ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Average Force ◽  
Anchor System ◽  
Load To Failure

We compared the biomechanical strength of the 2.5 mm PushLock suture anchor with a traditional Bio-SutureTak suture anchor in repair of ulnar collateral ligament injuries. Iatrogenic ulnar collateral ligament injuries in 18 cadaveric thumbs were repaired and used to test for load to failure and cyclic loading. The average force required to generate a 2 mm gap was 7.7 N for the 2.5 mm PushLock and 6.3 N for the Bio-SutureTak ( p = 0.04). The ultimate load to failure was 28.0 N for the 2.5 mm PushLock and 18.8 N for the Bio-SutureTak ( p = 0.16). There were no statistical differences between the two suture anchors under cyclic loading. The 2.5 mm PushLock suture anchor provides significantly stronger resistance to 2 mm gap formation at the repair site and is less likely to fail at the suture–ligament interface. However, there was no difference in the load to failure between the two suture anchors.

scholarly journals Arthroscopic Primary Repair of Proximal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears: With or Without Additional Suture Augmentation?

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Jonkergouw ◽  
Jelle P. van der List ◽  
Gregory S. DiFelice
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Suture Anchor ◽  
Primary Repair ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Type I ◽  
Acl Repair ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Objectives: Over the last years, arthroscopic primary repair of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears has shown excellent results owing to appropriate patient selection (only repairing proximal ACL tears and good tissue quality), minimal invasive surgery (arthroscopy) and focus on early range of motion. Some surgeons have repaired proximal ACL tears without suture augmentation while others have used internal suture augmentation to reinforce and thus protect the repaired ligament during range of motion. No studies have yet compared the two surgical techniques. The objective of this study was to compare failure rates, reoperation rates and patient-reported outcomes of arthroscopic primary repair with versus without suture augmentation. Methods: A retrospective search for all patients treated with suture anchor arthroscopic primary ACL repair between April 2008 and June 2016 was performed. All patients with isolated proximal ACL tears (type I) were included. Since the development of internal suture augmentation, this reinforcement was added to the repaired ACLs. Minimum follow-up length was 1.0 years. Results: A total of 56 patients were included (mean age 33 years (range: 14 - 57), 59% male) of which 28 (50%) patients received additional suture augmentation. Mean follow-up was 2.3 years (range: 1.0-9.2). Six of all patients had reruptured their repaired ACL (10.7%), of which four underwent uncomplicated ACL reconstruction and two were treated conservatively. Four reruptures were initially treated with primary repair only (4/28, 14.3%) and two patients with additional suture augmentation (2/28, 7.1%; p = 0.431). During follow-up, three patients underwent reoperation (5.4%; two for medial meniscus tear (one in each group) and one for tibial suture anchor removal of the suture augmentation). Patient-reported outcomes have so far been collected in 20 patients without reruptures (currently collecting), with mean Lysholm score of 96, modified Cincinnati 94, SANE 93, pre-injury Tegner 6.7, postoperative Tegner 6.3 and subjective IKDC 91. Objective IKDC was A in 90%, B in 5%, C in 5%. Conclusion: In this study, the total failure rate of arthroscopic primary ACL repair was 10.7% and was lower with additional suture augmentation (7.1%) than primary repair alone (14.3%). Patients with failed ACL repair underwent uncomplicated primary ACL reconstruction. We recommend adding suture augmentation in high-risk patients (i.e. adolescents, ones with hyperlaxity, high contact sports), to protect the repaired ligament, especially during early range of motion. These data support treating type I proximal ACL tears with arthroscopic primary repair.

scholarly journals Direct Comparison of Modified Jobe and Docking Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction at Midterm Follow-up

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 144-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin W. Arner ◽  
Edward S. Chang ◽  
Stephen Bayer ◽  
James P. Bradley
Keyword(s):  
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Shoulder Injuries ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Overhead Athletes ◽  
Additional Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: The modified Jobe and docking techniques are the 2 most commonly employed techniques for ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction among overhead athletes. However, no study has directly compared these techniques performed by a single surgeon. Current comparisons of these techniques have relied solely on systematic reviews and biomechanical studies. Hypothesis: There will be no difference in outcomes or return to play between the modified Jobe and docking techniques in elbow UCL reconstruction surgery. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Twenty-five modified Jobe and 26 docking UCL-reconstructive surgical procedures were performed by a single surgeon, each with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic (KJOC) score, Conway Scale, years played, sex, handedness, sport, position, palmaris versus gracilis graft type, concomitant or future arm/shoulder injuries, and need for additional surgery were compared between the groups. Patients who underwent future shoulder or elbow surgery, no matter the cause, were included. Results: No difference was seen between the modified Jobe and docking reconstruction cases in regard to KJOC scores (mean ± SD: 78.4 ± 19.5 vs 72.0 ± 26.0, P = .44), Conway Scale (return to play, any level: 84% vs 82%, P = .61), years played (14.7 ± 6.2 vs 15.2 ± 5.8, P = .52), sex ( P = .67), handedness ( P ≥ .999), sport ( P = .44), position ( P = .60), level of competition ( P = .59), and future surgery (12% vs 4%, P = .35). Palmaris graft type had significantly higher KJOC scores than hamstring grafts (82.3 ± 20.0 vs 57.9 ± 21.2, P = .001). The mean follow-up was 6.1 years in the modified Jobe group and 7.3 years in the docking group (mean = 6.7, P = .47). Conclusion: The modified Jobe and docking techniques are both suitable surgical options for elbow UCL reconstruction. There was no statistically significant difference between the techniques in regard to return to play, KJOC score, or need for subsequent surgery at 6.7-year follow-up. This is the first direct clinical comparison of these 2 techniques by a single surgeon at midterm follow-up.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document