Relevance of R0 Resection to Reduce Local Recurrence After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Neoplasms: Results from a Spanish Cohort of 188 Cases

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
D de Frutos ◽  
J Santiago ◽  
I Omella ◽  
B Agudo ◽  
B Tormo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Local Recurrence ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Colorectal Neoplasms ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Spanish Cohort

scholarly journals Clinical Practice of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Colorectal Neoplasms by a Colonoscopist with Limited Gastric Experience

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Hsin Hsu ◽  
Meng-Shun Sun ◽  
Hoi-Wan Lo ◽  
Ching-Yang Tsai ◽  
Yu-Jou Tsai
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Colorectal Neoplasms ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Delayed Bleeding ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Limited Experience ◽  
Mean Size ◽  
Delayed Perforation ◽  
The Mean

Objectives. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early colorectal neoplasms is regarded as a difficult technique and should commence after receiving the experiences of ESD in the stomach. The implementation of colorectal ESD in countries where early gastric cancer is uncommon might therefore be difficult. The aim is to delineate the feasibility and the learning curve of colorectal ESD performed by a colonoscopist with limited experience of gastric ESD.Methods. The first fifty cases of colorectal ESD, which were performed by a single colonoscopist between July 2010 and April 2013, were enrolled.Results. The mean of age was 64 (±9.204) years with mean size of neoplasm at 33 (±12.63) mm. The mean of procedure time was 70.5 (±48.9) min. The rates ofen blocresection, R0 resection, and curative resection were 86%, 86%, and 82%, respectively. Three patients had immediate perforation, but no patient developed delayed perforation or delayed bleeding.Conclusion. Our result disclosed that it is feasible for colorectal ESD to be performed by a colonoscopist with little experience of gastric ESD through satisfactory training and adequate case selection.

scholarly journals Endoscopic full-thickness resection of early colorectal neoplasms using an endoscopic submucosal dissection knife: a retrospective multicenter study

2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (05) ◽  
pp. E611-E616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Anne Guillaumot ◽  
Maximilien Barret ◽  
Jérémie Jacques ◽  
Romain Legros ◽  
Mathieu Pioche ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Colorectal Neoplasms ◽  
Endoscopic Resection ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic full-thickness resection allows resection of early gastrointestinal neoplasms not amenable to conventional endoscopic resection techniques, due to their location, presence of submucosal fibrosis, or suspected deep mural invasion. It is typically achieved using a dedicated over-the-scope device (full-thickness resection device or FTRD). The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of endoscopic full-thickness resection using an endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) knife. Patients and methods Consecutive patients who underwent full-thickness endoscopic resection at six tertiary care centers from August 2010 to June 2017 were retrospectively included. We conducted a comparative analysis of patient characteristics, technical success, adverse events, and time to discharge between patients treated by a full-thickness resection using an ESD knife. Results Twenty-one procedures were performed using an ESD knife. En-bloc resection and R0 resection rates were 95.2 % and 65 %, respectively. Clinical symptoms of perforation occurred in 66.7 %. There was no need for surgery or additional endoscopic procedures. Conclusion Endoscopic full-thickness resection of early colorectal neoplasms using an ESD knife might be feasible and safe. It allows complete resection of lesions with no limitation in size. The technique may be preferable to an other-the-scope resection device in lesions larger than 20 mm, and to surgery in selected cases of low-risk T1 colorectal carcinomas, non-lifting adenomas, submucosal tumors, or technically challenging lesion locations.

scholarly journals ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION WITH CIRCUMFERENTIAL INCISION VERSUS TUNNELING METHOD FOR TREATMENT OF SUPERFICIAL ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarso Magno Leite RIBEIRO ◽  
Vitor N ARANTES ◽  
Jonas Augusto RAMOS ◽  
Peter V DRAGANOV ◽  
Dennis YANG ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Local Recurrence ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Curative Resection ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
Superficial Esophageal Cancer ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of esophageal superficial neoplasm is associated with a high en bloc R0 resection rate and low recurrence. OBJECTIVE: We aim to compare the performance and clinical outcomes of ESD via ESD after circumferential incision (ESD-C) versus submucosal tunneling (ESD-T). METHODS: Single-center retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients who underwent ESD for superficial esophageal cancer, between 2009 and 2018. ESD-T was defined as the technique of making the mucosal incisions followed by submucosal tunneling in the oral to anal direction. ESD-C consisted of completing a circumferential incision followed by ESD. Main study outcomes included en bloc and R0 resection rates. Secondary outcomes included procedural characteristics, curative resection rate, local recurrence and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 65 procedures (23 ESD-T and 42 ESD-C) were performed for ESCC (40; 61.5%) and BE-neoplasia (25; 38.5%). There were no statistically significant differences between patients who underwent ESD-T versus ESD-C in en bloc (91.3% vs 100%, P=0.12), R0 (65.2% vs 78.6%, P=0.24), curative resection rates (65.2% vs 73.8%, P=0.47) and mean procedure time (118.7 min with vs 102.4 min, P=0.35). Adverse events for ESD-T and ESD-C were as follows: bleeding (0 versus 2.4%; P=0.53), perforation (4.3% vs 0; P=0.61), esophageal stricture (8.7% versus 9.5%; P=0.31). Local recurrence was encountered in 8.7% after ESD-T and 2.4% after ESD-C (P=0.28) at a mean follow-up of 8 and 2.75 years, respectively (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: ESD-T and ESD-C appear to be equally effective with similar safety profiles for the management of superficial esophageal neoplasms.

scholarly journals Palisade technique as an effective endoscopic submucosal dissection tool for large colorectal tumors

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (02) ◽  
pp. E210-E215
Author(s):  
Yuichiro Suzuki ◽  
Ken Ohata ◽  
Eiji Sakai ◽  
Ryoju Negishi ◽  
Maiko Takita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Local Recurrence ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Colorectal Tumors ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Safe Technique ◽  
Observation Period

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become the standard treatment for colorectal ESD, but large colorectal tumors remain difficult to remove. We developed a new method, called the palisade technique, by modifying the multiple tunneling technique. In this method, a palisade of submucosal tissue is left beneath the tumor to anchor a dissected specimen, maintaining effective submucosal traction. Patients and methods The study included 11 patients with large colorectal tumors that were over half the circumference of the colorectal lumen which were treated using the palisade technique from August 2017 to October 2019. Overall resection outcomes were assessed. Results All 11 lesions were removed en bloc. The R0 resection rate was 45.6 % because of marginal burning of the specimen, but no local recurrence was found after a median observation period of 31 months. The median submucosal dissection time (SDT) and submucosal dissection speed (SDS) were 170 minutes and 23.1 mm2/min, respectively. One case of post-ESD hemorrhage was successfully managed endoscopically, and two cases of post-colorectal ESD coagulation syndrome were managed conservatively. Conclusion The palisade technique can be an effective and safe technique for treating large colorectal tumors that extend over half the luminal circumference.

scholarly journals Acceptability of endoscopic submucosal dissection for sessile serrated lesions: comparison with non-sessile serrated lesions

2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (12) ◽  
pp. E1832-E1839
Author(s):  
Yuichiro Kuroki ◽  
Toshiyuki Endo ◽  
Kenta Iwahashi ◽  
Naoki Miyao ◽  
Reika Suzuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Postoperative Bleeding ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Proximal Colon ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Serrated Lesions

Abstract Background and study aims Sessile serrated lesions (SSL) are major precursor lesions of serrated pathway cancers, and appropriate treatment may prevent interval colorectal cancer. Studies have reported the outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for SSL; however, there are insufficient reports on endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We examined the characteristics and outcomes of SSL and compared them to those of non-SSL in ESD. Patients and methods We reviewed 370 consecutive cases in 322 patients who underwent colorectal ESD between January 2016 and March 2020 at our hospital. There were 267 0-IIa lesions that were stratified into 41 SSL and 226 non-SSL (intramucosal cancer, adenoma) cases. We used propensity matching to adjust for the variances in the factors affecting treatment between the SSL and non-SSL groups. Results In the baseline cases, young women and proximal colon tumor location were significantly more common in the SSL group. There were no statistically significant differences between the SSL and non-SSL groups in terms of en bloc resection rate (97.6 % vs. 99.6 %; P = 0.28), R0 resection rate (92.7 % vs. 93.4 %; P = 0.74), perforation (0 % vs. 0.9 %; P > 0.99), and postoperative bleeding (2.4 % vs. 1.8 %; P = 0.56). Thirty-eight pairs were matched using propensity score, and the median dissection speed (12 vs. 7.7 cm2/h; P = 0.0095) was significantly faster in the SSL than in the non-SSL group. Conclusions ESD for SSL was safely performed, and SSL was smoother to remove than non-SSL. ESD might be an acceptable endoscopic treatment option for SSL.

scholarly journals Advanced Colon Cancer after Curative Resection of Intramucosal Adenocarcinoma with Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

2021 ◽  
pp. 603-609
Author(s):  
Akiko Sasaki ◽  
Chikamasa Ichita ◽  
Chihiro Sumida ◽  
Karen Kimura ◽  
Takashi Nishino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Curative Resection ◽  
Submucosal Tumor ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Surveillance Colonoscopy ◽  
Epithelial Tumor ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Intramucosal Adenocarcinoma

Endoscopic resection, particularly endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), for colorectal cancers enables a precise pathological diagnosis and safe R0 resection. The recurrence rate after ESD is generally extremely low, with annual surveillance colonoscopy recommended. However, surveillance may not be considered for super-elderly patients owing to their condition. This is a case report of an 85-year-old man in whom curative resection was achieved for an intramucosal adenocarcinoma with ESD. The patient presented with a hypoechoic mass located in his lower right abdomen, diagnosed via surveillance abdominal ultrasound. He had undergone curative ESD for intramucosal cecal cancer 2 years prior. Colonoscopy revealed a type 2 epithelial tumor at the proximal aspect of the ESD scar. Ileocolic resection with lymph node dissection was performed. An epithelial tumor and well-differentiated adenocarcinoma but not a submucosal tumor was detected in the mucosal layer. The lesion was diagnosed not as a local recurrence after ESD but as a newly emerged original advanced cancer. After ESD for colorectal cancer, a newly developed advanced cancer may occur at the site of the ESD scar in a shorter term than usual. Surveillance colonoscopy after ESD is necessary even for super-elderly patients.

scholarly journals Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in a Western Center: Analysis of Outcomes and Safety Profile

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
João Santos-Antunes ◽  
Margarida Marques ◽  
Rui Morais ◽  
Fátima Carneiro ◽  
Guilherme Macedo
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Hybrid Technique ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Delayed Bleeding ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Gastrointestinal Lesions

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a well-established endoscopic technique for the treatment of gastrointestinal lesions. Colorectal ESD outcomes are less reported in the Western literature, and Portuguese data are still very scarce. Our aim was to describe our experience on colorectal ESD regarding its outcomes and safety profile. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We conducted a retrospective evaluation of recorded data on ESDs performed between 2015 and 2020. Only ESDs performed on epithelial neoplastic lesions were selected for further analysis. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of a total of 167 colorectal ESDs, 153 were included. Technical success was achieved in 147 procedures (96%). The lesions were located in the colon (<i>n</i> = 24) and rectum (<i>n</i> = 123). The en bloc resection rate was 92% and 97%, the R0 resection rate was 83% and 82%, and the curative resection rate was 79% and 78% for the colon and the rectum, respectively. The need for a hybrid technique was the only risk factor for piecemeal or R1 resection. We report a perforation rate of 3.4% and a 4.1% rate of delayed bleeding; all the adverse events were manageable endoscopically, without the need of blood transfusions or surgery. Most of the lesions were laterally spreading tumours of the granular mixed type (70%), and 20% of the lesions were malignant (12% submucosal and 8% intramucosal cancer). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Our series on colorectal ESD reports a very good efficacy and safety profile. This technique can be applied by endoscopists experienced in ESD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document