Low-Dose Aspirin Thromboprophylaxis Is Safe and Effective in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty with or without Outpatient Pneumatic Compression Devices

Author(s):  
Alex Tang ◽  
Katherine A. Lygrisse ◽  
Stephen G. Zak ◽  
Matthew S. Hepinstall ◽  
James D. Slover ◽  
...  

AbstractVenous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a serious complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Current guidelines recommend pharmacologic prophylaxis with or without intermittent pneumatic compression devices (IPCDs). At our institution, portable IPCDs were previously worn by THA patients at standard risk for VTE for 14 days. Routine prescription of portable outpatient IPCDs was discontinued due to concerns with their efficacy and safety. We sought to determine if discontinuation of portable outpatient IPCDs changed VTE rates after THA. A retrospective review of 1,825 consecutive THA cases was conducted identifying patients with VTE, periprosthetic fractures, dislocations, bleeding complications, infection, and death at 90 days postoperatively. Patients were divided into two cohorts. One cohort received outpatient IPCDs for a period of 14 days (control) while the other did not (no-IPCD). All patients received inpatient IPCDs and were maintained on 81-mg aspirin (ASA) twice daily for 28 days. A total of 748 IPCD patients and 1,077 no-IPCD patients were identified. There was no difference between the total VTE rate for the IPCD versus no-IPCD groups (0 vs. 0.19%, p = 0.24). There were also no differences in periprosthetic fractures (p = 0.09), dislocations (p = 0.22), bleeding complications (p = 0.79), or infection rates (p = 0.75). No deaths were observed. The use of a low-dose ASA thromboprophylaxis protocol was safe and effective for VTE prevention in standard-risk patients undergoing THA with or without portable IPCDs. Any marginal benefit of portable IPCD use was too small to demonstrate despite our relatively large sample size.

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 649-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Huppertz ◽  
Alexander Lembcke ◽  
El-hadi Sariali ◽  
Tahir Durmus ◽  
Carsten Schwenke ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 1927-1932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomas Amenabar ◽  
Wael A. Rahman ◽  
Vineet V. Avhad ◽  
Ramiro Vera ◽  
Allan E. Gross ◽  
...  

Injury Extra ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 209 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.M. Calori ◽  
M. d’Imporzano ◽  
L. Tagliabue

Injury ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (11) ◽  
pp. 1674-1680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bishoy Youssef ◽  
George Pavlou ◽  
Nikhil Shah ◽  
George Macheras ◽  
Eleftherios Tsiridis

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 791-796 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Khramov ◽  
M. A. Makarov ◽  
S. A. Makarov ◽  
V. N. Amirdzhanova ◽  
A. V. Rybnikov ◽  
...  

Surgical treatment in patients with rheumatic diseases (RDs) is associated with the higher risk of complications due to the presence of the inflammatory process, to long-term therapy with glucocorticoids, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, and biologic agents (BA), to decreased physical activity, and the severity of functional disorders, and to obvious osteoporosis. All this increases the risk of intraoperative complications, including periprosthetic fractures.Objective: to comparatively analyze intraoperative periprosthetic fractures of the greater trochanter, acetabulum, and proximal femur during total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with RDs.Subjects and methods. From 1998 till 2017, a total of 1569 THA were performed in patients with RA, including 464 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 396 with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and 709 with osteoarthritis (OA).Results and discussion. Periprosthetic fractures after THA were diagnosed in a total of 68 (4.33%) patients, including 23 (4.96%) patients with RA, 27 (6.82%) with JRA and SLE, and 18 (2.54%) with OA; 42 (61.8%) patients with periprosthetic fractures underwent osteosynthesis. Statistical analysis of the findings revealed significantly higher rates of complications in patients with RA and JRA with SLE (p < 0.005).Conclusion. The findings confirm that the risk of periprosthetic fractures is higher in patients with inflammatory diseases, including RA, JRA, and SLE. These patients require a special approach that involves medical correction of impaired bone metabolism and proper individual selection of endoprosthetic components, by taking into account the anatomical features of female patients and delicate bone handling during surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document