Outcome after aortic valve replacement - comparison of homografts versus mechanical prostheses

2005 ◽  
Vol 53 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Kilian ◽  
M Oberhoffer ◽  
G Nollert ◽  
E Kreuzer ◽  
B Reichart
2011 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Garatti ◽  
Francesca Mori ◽  
Francesco Innocente ◽  
Alberto Canziani ◽  
Piervincenzo Gagliardotto ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christos Alexiou ◽  
Angus McDonald ◽  
Stephen M. Langley ◽  
Malcolm J.R. Dalrymple-Hay ◽  
Marcus P. Haw ◽  
...  

1982 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Pellegrini ◽  
B. Peronace ◽  
E. Marcazzan ◽  
C. Rossi ◽  
T. Colombo

The clinical study is reported of the results of heart valve replacement surgery with a new pyrolytic carbon tilting disc prosthesis manufactured in Italy. From March 1977 to January 1981, at the «De Gasperis» Cardiosurgery Center, this prosthesis has been implanted in 644 patients: 283 for mitral valve replacement, 240 for aortic valve replacement, and 121 for the replacement of both mitral and aortic valves. To have a sufficiently long period of post-surgery follow-up, we considered the results of 207 patients (124 cases of isolated mitral valve replacement and 83 cases of isolated aortic valve replacement), who underwent surgery consecutively from March 1977 to December 1979. The hospital mortality was 10.5% for mitral valve replacement and 4.8% for aortic valve replacement. All patients who were discharged from hospital, except 2, were subjected to clinical, electrocardiographic, phonocardiographic, ecocardiographic and radiological checks. The average follow-up period was approximately 20 months: clinical results were satisfactory. The probability of survival, expressed by actuarial curve, was, three years after surgery, 94% for patients who underwent mitral valve replacement and 97.5% for those who underwent aortic valve replacement. The probability of embolism was, three years after surgery, 8.5% for patients with mitral replaced and 5% for aortic. Even if further confirmations are needed the mortality rate and the probability of embolism related to this new prosthesis, are lower, over the same period of follow-up, than that found in the groups of patients who underwent valve replacement surgery, at the same Center, with Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley prostheses. The phonocardiographic and ecocardiographic characteristics of this new prosthesis were also investigated.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 543
Author(s):  
V.A. Ivanov ◽  
E.V. Ivanova ◽  
E.P. Evseev ◽  
L.N. Ivanova ◽  
T.G. Nikityuk

Circulation ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 321-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flavian M. Lupinetti ◽  
Joanie Warner ◽  
Thomas K. Jones ◽  
S. Paul Herndon

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 386-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ville Kytö ◽  
Elina Ahtela ◽  
Jussi Sipilä ◽  
Päivi Rautava ◽  
Jarmo Gunn

Abstract OBJECTIVES The optimal choice of valve prosthesis in surgical aortic valve replacement for infective endocarditis (IE) is controversial. We studied outcomes after mechanical versus biological prosthetic valve surgical aortic valve replacement in IE patients. METHODS All patients with native-valve IE aged 16–70 years undergoing mechanical or biological surgical aortic valve replacement in Finland, between 2004 and 2014, were retrospectively studied (n = 213). Outcomes were all-cause mortality, ischaemic stroke, major bleeding and aortic valve reoperation at 1 year and 5 years. Results were adjusted for baseline features (age, sex, comorbidity burden, atrial fibrillation, valvular stenosis, concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting, extension, urgency, year and centre of operation). Median follow-up was 5 years. RESULTS The 5-year mortality rate was 19.0% with mechanical prostheses and 34.8% with biological prostheses [hazard ratio (HR) 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.23–0.92; P = 0.03]. Ischaemic stroke rates were 8.3% with mechanical prostheses and 16.8% with biological prostheses at 5 years (HR 0.21, CI 0.06–0.79; P = 0.01). Results were comparable in patients aged 16–59 and 60–70 years (interaction P = 0.84). Major bleeding within 5 years was similar between mechanical (11.3%) and biological valve (13.4%) groups (P = 0.95) with comparable rates of both gastrointestinal and intracranial bleeds. Reoperation rates at 5 years were 5.0% for mechanical prostheses and 9.2% for biological prostheses (P = 0.14). The 1-year ischaemic stroke rate was lower with mechanical prostheses (3.6% vs 11.6%, P =0.03), whereas mortality, major bleeding and reoperation rates were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS The use of mechanical aortic valve is associated with lower mid-term mortality compared to biological prosthesis in patients with native-valve IE aged ≤70 years. Our results do not support the routine choice of a biological aortic valve prosthesis in this patient group.


2005 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 150-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. R. E. Jamieson ◽  
R. T. Miyagishima ◽  
C. Henderson ◽  
E. Germann

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document