The permeability of the biliary epithelium to [14C]ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), a hypercholeretic bile acid, was compared to that of the 14C-labeled nonhypercholeretic bile acids cholic acid (CA), taurocholic acid (TCA), and tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA) by means of anterograde intrabiliary infusions and retrograde intrabiliary injections in the anesthetized rat. Anterograde intrabiliary infusions were performed by perfusing an isolated segment of common bile duct in vivo. After anterograde intrabiliary infusions, the fraction of unrecovered UDCA (that had presumably been absorbed from the biliary lumen) was 11.03 +/- 1.03 (SE)% (n = 6) of the administered dose. It was significantly higher than that of TUDCA (1.25 +/- 0.27%; n = 5; P less than 0.01), CA (2.62 +/- 0.43%; n = 4; P less than 0.01), and TCA (2.57 +/- 0.79%; n = 6; P less than 0.01). In separate experiments, bile was collected from the common bile duct and from the left hepatic duct. UDCA recovered from the left hepatic duct was found in the conjugated form, indicating that, after absorption in the common bile duct, it had been conjugated by the hepatocyte and secreted into bile. After retrograde intrabiliary injections of UDCA and CA, the cumulative percentages of recovered radioactivity were not significantly different (84.50 +/- 2.65 and 87.33 +/- 1.80%, respectively); however, peak recovery of UDCA was significantly delayed compared with that of CA. Moreover, UDCA was recovered mostly in the conjugated form, while CA was recovered mostly in the unconjugated form. These results suggest that, in the rat, UDCA is significantly more absorbed by the biliary tree than CA, TUDCA, and TCA. They support the hypothesis that UDCA undergoes a cholehepatic circulation.
Degradation of Mg-6Zn alloy stents does not influence the healing of the common bile duct in vivo
