Spinous Process Splitting Laminectomy for Lumbar Canal Stenosis: A Critical Appraisal

2008 ◽  
Vol 51 (04) ◽  
pp. 204-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Lee ◽  
S. Lee
2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 176
Author(s):  
Manish Dwivedi ◽  
Vikas Sawla ◽  
Atul Varshney ◽  
Apoorv Acharya

2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masato Tomii ◽  
Yasunobu Itoh ◽  
Shinichi Numazawa ◽  
Kazuo Watanabe ◽  
Hiroshi Nakagawa

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 231-235
Author(s):  
THIAGO DANTAS MATOS ◽  
YONY OSORIO GARCIA ◽  
HERTON RODRIGO TAVARES COSTA ◽  
HELTON LUIZ APARECIDO DEFINO

ABSTRACT Objective Considering that the technique of spinous process splitting has been advocated as a less invasive treatment of lumbar stenosis, the objective of this study was to evaluate the preliminary results of this technique in the surgical treatment of lumbar canal stenosis. Methods Twenty patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis who underwent surgical treatment for lumbar canal decompression with the spinous process splitting technique were assessed in the preoperative period and on postoperative days 1, 7 and 30 for VAS for lower back and lower limbs pain and radiographic evaluation of the operated segment. Results The mean visual analogue scale score for lumbar pain in the preoperative assessment was 4.2 ± 3.37 and 0.85 ± 0.88, 1.05 ± 1.19 and 1.15 ± 1.04 after 1, 7 and 30 postoperative days, respectively. The mean VAS score for lower limb pain was 8 ± 1.72 preoperatively, and 0.7 ± 1.13, 0.85 ± 1.04, and 1.05 ± 1 after 1, 7, and 30 postoperative days, respectively. There were no radiographic signs of instability of the vertebral segment operated in the radiographic evaluation. Conclusions Decompression of the lumbar canal through the spinous process splitting technique in patients with lumbar canal stenosis had good immediate and short-term results in relation to low back and lower limbs pain. Level of evidence IV; Therapeutic Study.


2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 304-309
Author(s):  
Makoto Senoo ◽  
Tsukasa Sato ◽  
Daisuke Mori ◽  
Mikio Nishiya ◽  
Yasufumi Otake

Author(s):  
Santino Ottavio Tomasi ◽  
Giuseppe Emmanuele Emmanuele Umana ◽  
Gianluca Scalia ◽  
Giuseppe Raudino ◽  
Vlado Stevanovic ◽  
...  

Background Laminotomy for lumbar stenosis is a well-defined procedure and represents a routine in every neurosurgical department. It is a common experience that the mono- or bilateral paraspinal muscles detachment together with supra and interspinous ligaments injury can lead to postoperative pain. In literature has been reported the application at the level of the lumbar spine of a minimally invasive technique defined as lumbar spinous process-splitting technique (LSPST). Methods In the current study, we present a case series of 12 patients that underwent LSPSL from September 2019 to April 2020. Two patient suffering from ligamentum flavum cyst, 8 patients with single level lumbar canal stenosis (LCS) and two patients with two-level LCS. The approach was mini-open, with reduced soft tissue dissection and without paraspinal muscles injury. Moreover, a novel morphological classification of postoperative muscle atrophy is proposed as well as a volumetric analysis of the decompression achieved. Conclusion At our knowledge, this is the first description of this surgical technique and the first LSPSL case series in Europe. Furthermore, cases of ligamentum flavum cyst removal using this safe and effective technique are not yet reported. Abbreviations Lumbar canal stenosis (LCS), lumbar spinous process-splitting technique (LSPST), minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS)


2005 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 405-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kota Watanabe ◽  
Toshihiko Hosoya ◽  
Tateru Shiraishi ◽  
Morio Matsumoto ◽  
Kazuhiro Chiba ◽  
...  

✓ In conventional laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis (LCS), intraoperative damage of posterior supporting structures can lead to irreversible atrophy of paraspinal muscles. In 2001, the authors developed a new procedure for lumbar laminectomy, the lumbar spinous process—splitting laminectomy (LSPSL). In this new procedure, the spinous process is split longitudinally in the middle and then divided at its base from the posterior arch, leaving the bilateral paraspinal muscles attached to the lateral aspects. Ample working space for laminectomy is obtained by retracting the split spinous process laterally together with its attached paraspinal muscles. After successfully decompressing nerve tissues, each half of the split spinous process is reapproximated using a strong suture. Thus, the supra- and interspinous ligaments are preserved, as is the spinous process, and damage to the paraspinal muscles is minimal. Eighteen patients with LCS underwent surgery in which this new technique was used. Twenty patients in whom conventional laminectomy was undertaken were chosen as controls. At 2 years, the clinical outcomes (as determined using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association [JOA] scores and recovery rate) and the rate of measured magnetic resonance imaging—documented paravertebral muscle atrophy were evaluated and compared between the two groups. The mean JOA score recovery rates were 67.6 and 59.2%, respectively, for patients treated with LSPSL and conventional laminectomy; the mean rates of paravertebral muscle atrophy were 5.3 and 23.9%, respectively (p = 0.0005). Preservation of posterior supporting structures and satisfactory recovery rate after 2 years indicated that this technique can be a useful alternative to conventional decompression surgery for lumbar canal stenosis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document