Comparison of Spinal Alignment between XLIF, TLIF, PLIF, and PLF in the Treatment of Single Level Spondylolisthesis: A Retrospective Study

Background: Most lumbar spinal fusion procedures are performed to increase fusion potential, correct a deformity, and decompress spinal nerve roots. Nowadays, there are several spinal fusion techniques such as extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion (XLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and posterolateral fusion (PLF). However, there are no studies directly comparing their capacity to alter lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis, intervertebral disc height, foraminal height, and the grade of slip for treating single level spondylolisthesis in Thailand. Objective: To compare which lumbar interbody technique amongst XLIF, TLIF, PLIF, and PLF, is the most effective in restoring spinal alignment in cases such as lumbar lordosis, increased segmental lordosis, increased intervertebral disc height, increased foraminal height, and a reduced slip grade in spondylolisthesis patients. Materials and Methods: The medical records and radiographs of single level spondylolisthesis patients treated in Siriraj hospital between 2002 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data and radiographic parameters such as lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis, intervertebral disc height, foraminal height, and grade of slip, including preoperative and postoperative data were collected and analyzed. An inter-observer/ intra-observer reliability test for all parameters was also performed. Results: Two hundred forty patients including 192 females and 48 males with a mean age of 60.1 years were included in the present study. There was no statistically significant difference in demographic data except in younger patients in the PLF group and those with shorter length of stays in the XLIF group. The present study results indicated that there was a statistically significant increase in lumbar lordosis, increased foraminal height, and decreased slip grade in the XLIF group when compared to other three groups as TLIF, PLIF, and PLF. Conclusion: All spinal fusion techniques could improve lumbar spinal alignment, however, XLIF is superior to other procedures, especially in lumbar lordosis, foraminal height restoration, and slip grade. Keywords: Lumbar spondylolisthesis; Extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; Posterior lumbar interbody fusion; Posterolateral fusion; Lumbar lordosis

Cervical Spinal Alignment Change Accompanying Spondylosis Exposes Harmonization Failure with Total Spinal Balance: A Japanese Cohort Survey Randomly Sampled from a Basic Resident Registry

The relationship between spinal posture and quality of life has garnered considerable attention with the increase in older community-dwelling residents. However, details of this association remain insufficient. A recent Japanese population cohort epidemiological locomotion survey (the Obuse study) revealed that the C2–C7 cervical sagittal vertical axis (CSVA) began to increase in males from their 60s, but not in females. This study aimed to clarify the pathology of these cervical spondylotic changes. A total of 411 participants (202 male and 209 female) aged between 50 and 89 years were selected by random sampling from a cooperating town’s resident registry. All participants underwent lateral X-ray photography in a standing position for the measurement of several sagittal spinal alignment parameters, including CSVA, C2–C7 cervical lordosis (CL), T1 slope (T1S), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA). The presence of cervical spondylotic changes was also recorded. Associations of cervical sagittal spinal alignment with cervical spondylosis and between cervical and total sagittal spinal alignment were examined. The prevalence of cervical spondylosis was significantly higher in males (81%) than in females (70%) (p = 0.01). CL was significantly smaller in cervical spondylosis subjects when adjusted by age (3.4 degrees less; p = 0.01). T1S minus CL displayed a moderate positive correlation with CSVA in both males and females (r = 0.49 and 0.48, respectively, both p < 0.01). In males only, CSVA and CL showed weak positive correlations with SVA (r = 0.31 and 0.22, respectively, both p < 0.01) independently of age. Cervical spinal misalignment was more clearly associated with diminished SF-8TM scores in females than in males. In community-dwelling elderly residents, cervical sagittal spinal alignment change accompanying cervical spondylosis manifested as hypofunction to compensate for whole-spine imbalance.

Novel Method for Evaluation of Sagittal Spinal Alignment Using Cluster Analysis of Slope of Each Vertebra.

Background: The parameters of sagittal spinal alignment proposed to date measure only the specific sectional angle or the specific sectional distance of the entire spine. To evaluate the alignment of the entire spine without segmentation, we sought to measure and analyze the slope of each vertebral body from skull to pelvis. The purpose of this study was to confirm the effectiveness of this novel analytic method for the evaluation of spinal alignment that considers the slope of each spinal vertebra using graph and cluster analysis.Methods: Every spinal slope from McGregor’s slope to the sacral slope of 88 patients who underwent standing whole spine radiography was measured. Subsequently, we conducted cluster analysis of each spinal slope to understand the characteristics of sagittal alignment.Results: Cluster analysis of whole spinal slopes did not provide useful results in this study because the number of cases per cluster was small due to the large number of parameters. Therefore, we focused the cluster analysis on only the cervical spine slopes. Then, we categorized cervical alignment into four groups (named Normal, Mismatch, Straight, and Sigmoid) based on the results of the cluster analysis. Patients in the Normal and Mismatch groups were older and had lower lumbar apex (L4), apparent lordo-kyphosis around the thoracolumbar junction, and high thoracic kyphosis (TK). Patients in the straight and sigmoid groups were younger, had a higher lumbar apex (L3), flat thoracolumbar junction, and low TK. There was no significant difference between the four groups with respect to pelvic incidence (PI) or pelvic tilt (PT).Conclusion: We proposed a novel method for visually understanding sagittal alignment. Using this analysis method, differences and similarities of sagittal alignment between each group can be easily identified. More detailed analysis of the whole spine may be possible by increasing the number of cases.

Variation in Sagittal Alignment Parameters in Adult Patients before Spine Surgery: A Serial Imaging Study Using Antero-Posterior and Latero-Lateral Projections

Sagittal parameters of the spine are closely related to the evaluation and treatment of spine disease. However, there has been little research on variations in preoperative sagittal spinal alignment. This study was conducted to assess the variation in sagittal spinal alignment on serial antero-posterior and latero-lateral projections (EOS imaging) in adult patients before spine surgery. The sagittal parameters of 66 patients were collected from two serial images. Comparison between the first and second sagittal parameters was evaluated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the time interval between radiographs, patient’s age, and type of surgery. The sagittal vertical axis (SVA) exhibited statistically significant changes (p = 0.023), with the mean SVA increasing statistically (61.7 mm vs. 73.6 mm) and standard deviation increasing (51.5 mm vs. 61.6 mm) in the second image. Subgroup analysis showed significant differences in SVA (p = 0.034) in patients with an interval of >3 months; statistical differences in borderline levels in the SVA (p = 0.049) were observed in patients aged >65 years. Other parameters did not show statistically significant differences, except for SVA. Furthermore, SVA differences were statistically significant with increases in the EOS interval (>3 months) and patient age (>65 years).

Can Proximal Junctional Kyphosis After Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity Be Predicted by Preoperative Dynamic Sagittal Alignment Change With 3D Gait Analysis? A Case–control Study

PurposeTo investigate whether preoperative dynamic spinal alignment that worsened during gait as detected by three-dimensional (3D) gait analysis can be a predictive factor for proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) after corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) with a minimum 1-year follow-up.MethodWe included 27 patients with ASD who underwent 3D gait analysis before corrective surgery and had >1-year follow-up. Dynamic spinal alignment parameters were obtained using a Nexus motion capture system (Vicon, Oxford, UK) with reflective markers. Spinal alignment was assessed in each region and pelvic alignment was assessed with surface markers. Patients were asked to walk for as long as possible around an oval walkway. We obtained the averaged dynamic parameters in the final lap and compared them between patients with PJK(+) and those with PJK(–).ResultsPJK occurred in 7 patients (26%). Preoperative angle between the thoracic spine and the pelvis was larger in patients with PJK(+) than in those with PJK(–) (32.3 ± 8.1 vs 18.7 ± 13.5, P = 0.020) with sufficient sample size. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified the angle between the thoracic spine and pelvis as an independent risk for PJK.ConclusionPreoperative thoracic kyphosis exacerbated by gait as determined in 3D gait analysis is a preoperative independent risk factor of PJK in patients undergoing ASD corrective surgery.

Effect of Spinal Alignment Changes on Lower Back Pain in Patients Treated with Total Hip Arthroplasty for Hip Osteoarthritis

Background and objectives: The influence of changes in spinal alignment after total hip arthroplasty (THA) on improvement in lower back pain (LBP) remains controversial. To evaluate how changes in spinal malalignment correlate with improvement in preoperative LBP in patients who underwent THA for hip osteoarthritis. Materials and Methods: From November 2015 to January 2017, 104 consecutive patients who underwent unilateral THA were prospectively registered. Whole spine X-rays and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were obtained preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. The PROs used were the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for back pain, EuroQol 5 Dimension, and Short Form-12. Results: Seventy-four (71%) patients with complete data were eligible for the analysis. The sagittal parameters changed slightly but significantly. Coronal alignment significantly improved. Twenty-six (37%) patients had LBP preoperatively. These patients had smaller lumbar lordosis (LL), larger PT, and larger PI minus LL than the patients without LBP. Fourteen (54%) of the 26 patients with preoperative LBP showed pain improvement, but there were no significant differences in the radiographic parameters. Conclusions: Although preoperative LBP was likely to be resolved after THA, there were no significant correlations between alignment changes and LBP improvement. The cause of LBP in patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA) patients might be multifactorial.

Does obesity affect acetabular cup position, spinopelvic function and sagittal spinal alignment? A prospective investigation with standing and sitting assessment of primary hip arthroplasty patients

Background Total hip arthroplasty (THA) instability is influenced by acetabular component positioning, spinopelvic function and sagittal spinal alignment. Obesity is considered as a risk factor of THA instability, but the causal relationship remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the influence of BMI on (1) spinopelvic function (lumbar flexibility, pelvic mobility and hip motion), (2) sagittal spinal alignment pre- and postoperatively and (3) acetabular cup position postoperatively in primary THA patients in a prospective setting. Methods One hundred ninety patients receiving primary total hip arthroplasty were enrolled in a prospective cohort study and retrospectively analysed. All patients received stereoradiography (EOS) in standing and relaxed sitting position pre-and postoperatively. C7-sagittal vertical axis (C7-SVA), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), anterior plane pelvic tilt (APPT), and pelvic femoral angle (PFA) were assessed. Key parameters of the spinopelvic function were defined as lumbar flexibility (∆ LL = LLstanding − LLsitting), pelvic mobility (∆ PT = PTstanding − PTsitting) and hip motion (∆ PFA = PFAstanding − PFAsitting). Pelvic mobility was further defined based on ∆ PT as stiff, normal and hypermobile (∆ PT < 10°; 10°–30°; > 30°). The patients were stratified to BMI according to WHO definition: normal BMI ≥ 18.5–24.9 kg/m2 (n = 68), overweight ≥ 25.0–29.9 kg/m2 (n = 81) and obese ≥ 30–39.9 kg/m2 (n = 41). Post-hoc analysis according to Hochberg's GT2 was applied to determine differences between BMI groups. Results Standing cup inclination was significant higher in the obese group compared to the normal BMI group (45.3° vs. 40.1°; p = 0.015) whereas standing cup anteversion was significantly decreased (22.0° vs. 25.3°; p = 0.011). There were no significant differences for spinopelvic function key parameter lumbar flexibility (∆ LL), pelvic mobility (∆ PT) and hip motion (∆ PFA) in relation to BMI stratified groups. The obese group demonstrated significant enhanced pelvic retroversion compared to the normal BMI group (APPT − 1.8° vs. 2.4°; p = 0.028). The preoperative proportion of stiff pelvic mobility was decreased in the obese group (12.2%) compared to normal (25.0%) and overweight (27.2%) groups. Spinal sagittal alignment in C7-SVA and PI-LL mismatch demonstrated significantly greater imbalance in the obese group compared to the normal BMI group (68.6 mm vs. 42.6 mm, p = 0.002 and 7.7° vs. 1.2°, p = 0.032, respectively) The proportion of patients with imbalanced C7-SVA was higher in the obese (58.5%) than in the normal BMI group (44.1%). Conclusions The significantly increased spinal sagittal imbalance with altered pelvic mechanics is a potential cause for the reported increased risk of THA dislocations in obese patients. Consequently, the increased spinal sagittal imbalance in combination with normal pelvic mobility need to be taken into account when performing THA in obese patients.