How Does Development Policy Change (or Not)?

Author(s):  
Andy Sumner ◽  
Meera Tiwari
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denise D.P. Thompson

Prompted by Birkland and Warnement’s (2014) findings that the earthquake was not a significant focusing event in Haiti, the author reassessed the issue. Using the 2010 earthquake as the starting point, a detailed content analysis of evaluation and strategy report and DRR and developmental plans to find the level of policy adopted and implemented after the earthquake. Using the criterion of event-related implementation as a proxy for event-related policy change the author judges whether and to what extent was the earthquake a focusing event. Among the findings are that not only were there event-related policy change inside and outside of Haiti. Many policy changes were significant in the way they shaped development policy, disaster risk reduction policy and practice as well as humanitarian policy and practices and the tools and methods used in planning for and responding to catastrophes. The more fundamental question is whether, once adopted and implemented, the policy changes can be sustained.  Findings show significant challenges in that regard. 


1994 ◽  
Vol 104 (427) ◽  
pp. 1465
Author(s):  
David E. Hojman ◽  
Gustav Ranis ◽  
Syed Akhtar Mahmood

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 54 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Rowe ◽  
Ana Maria Peredo ◽  
Megan Sullivan ◽  
John Restakis

After the financial crisis in 2008 and amid growing concerns about climate change, interest in systemic alternatives to neoliberal capitalism is growing. This cultural shift helps explain the enthusiasm from political elites, media, and academics that greeted the launch of Evergreen Co-operative Corporation in 2009. Based in Cleveland Ohio, Evergreen is a network of worker-owned co-operatives with scalability and replicability woven into its design. But how warranted is the broad-based enthusiasm around Evergreen? Is this a model that can be replicated across North America as its founders suggest? Based on site visits and stakeholder interviews, we argue that there are important limits on desires to reproduce the “Cleveland Model.”  However, its ambitions for scalability and replicability position it to contribute to the important project of movement building that can facilitate the policy change needed to scale up the co-operative alternative.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document