Management Accounting and Control Research in Public Organizations

Author(s):  
Raili Pollanen
2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 23-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Bedford ◽  
Roland F. Speklé

ABSTRACT The capacity for survey-based research to advance theoretical knowledge is heavily dependent on the degree to which the measures used capture the constructs that they are intended to represent. Despite the importance of construct validity, the management accounting and control (MAC) literature tends to devote less attention to construct validity than other areas of organizational research. In this article, we discuss contemporary thinking about construct validity and examine how this compares to established practice in MAC research through a systematic review of survey studies from 1996 to 2015. Based on this review, we identify four areas where greater attention is warranted: specifying construct dimensionality, justifying the choice of the measurement model, distinguishing between causal indicators and composite indicators in formative measurement models, and being judicious in the use of single item measures. We discuss the implications of each issue and provide suggestions on how they can be addressed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Bedford ◽  
Roland F. Speklé

ABSTRACT This article presents an inventory of constructs measured in survey-based management accounting and control (MAC) research from 1996 to 2015. The inventory is intended to serve as a reference source for researchers to identify prior operationalizations of constructs of interest.


2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-328
Author(s):  
Lisa-Marie Wibbeke ◽  
Maik Lachmann

Abstract For decades, management accounting and control (MAC) researchers have employed a diverse set of source disciplines to predict and examine behavior, and psychology is among the most frequently drawn upon. Although the literature confirms that psychological theories are highly relevant to MAC research, the existing knowledge on this field remains fragmented. Given this background, we examine recent MAC research through a systematic review of the different subfields of psychology to investigate the development of this stream of research. To do so, we collect 125 relevant articles from nine leading accounting journals between 2000 and 2019 and analyze their contents. On this basis, we provide a detailed overview of the use of psychological theories in recent literature and identify links between specific theories and MAC topics. We find that the quantity and proportion of psychology-based MAC research and the diversity of psychology subfields all increase during our investigation period, especially between 2015 and the first half of 2019. Overall, most studies address performance measurement and evaluation topics, and social psychology concepts are the most frequently applied. However, we find considerable differences in the application of psychological theories across different MAC topics. Our review provides insights into the content of this research stream and, thus, serves as a valuable source for researchers seeking an overview of previous investigations drawing on different subfields of psychology.


2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Barnes ◽  
Linda R. Elliott ◽  
Phil Tessier ◽  
Plamen Petrov

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document