Authorship ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriaan Van der Weel

The evolution of our literate culture across the millennia has been marked by clearly identified and well-documented milestones in the history of reading and writing technologies. Changes in literacy, understood as the sum of reading and writing practices, have always followed such milestones at some remove. Not only are they much more diffuse in character and much harder to identify and describe, but they stand in a tenuous cause-and-effect relationship to the technologies in question. This article makes a plea for a stronger awareness of the effects of technology on our literate culture. Reading has always received a fair amount of attention (with the history of reading being a prominent subdiscipline of the field of book studies), but it should be recognized that its corollary, authorship, is a central, and, as digital technology is becoming ubiquitous—at least in the Western world—, increasingly important part of our literate culture, too. With Web 2.0 technology enabling more people than ever in history to write for public or at least semi-public consumption, the concept, definition and status of authorship is in need of radical revision.


Author(s):  
Maria Michela Sassi

This chapter examines the role that writing in the modalities of philosophical formulation in ancient Greece. It first considers how the rise of the polis intertwined with the beginnings of Greek philosophy, taking into account the theses of Jean-Pierre Vernant and Geoffrey Lloyd, before discussing the range of interactive elements that may have contributed to the development of that particular critical life that characterizes the first expressions of philosophical rationality. One such element is the particular character of Greek religion. The chapter goes on to analyze the combination of egotism and innovation as an integral component of Greek cultural style, and the role of writing technologies in this regard, as well as how literacy and writing contributed to the development of critical thinking in the Greek world. Finally, it explores three different approaches to philosophical writing attributed to Anaximander, Xenophanes, and Heraclitus.


Author(s):  
David W. Overbey

This chapter examines virtual collaboration, including the production and use of writing, between doctors at different hospitals mediated by RP-7, a robot that enables a specialist at one hospital to evaluate the vital signs of and provide diagnosis for a patient at another hospital. Analysis of RP-7 is situated in a theoretical deliberation about the shift from print to digital texts and technologies. I argue that a consequence of this shift is the loss of mutual presence—the alignment of materiality, practice, and expertise—in the production and use of texts. This alignment is transparent and intrinsic to print texts but is lost in digital environments precisely because they afford access to texts irrespective of a user’s background, location, or access to and familiarity with other tools, technologies, or workplaces. Study of the writing used and generated during the collaboration between doctors mediated by RP-7 is grounds for the claim that the future of virtual collaborative writing in professional contexts will involve the re-alignment of mutual presence. In other words, the success of digital writing technologies in social practice will depend on the extent to which they bare similarity to, rather than differ from, print texts and technologies. The chapter concludes by emphasizing the value of this research to both academia and industry.


Author(s):  
B. Benedict ◽  
T. Smith-Jackson ◽  
A. Bells

STEM learners are expected to be competent in both technical and interpersonal proficiencies. The writing proficiency was defined to ensure the students are prepared for continuing graduate education and/ or a career in the private or public sector. Despite the current writing research, there is a lack of effective solutions to support writing development, specifically for collegiate STEM learners. Therefore, a three phase study was conducted to address concerns regarding writing in STEM fields but this article only discusses the implications of Phase II. Phase II involved the use of a User-Centered Design approach to increase the likelihood of adoption of a writing support tool. Methods included focus group and interviews and participants were professors and students. Qualitative Analysis was conducted and the NARA framework was used to extract user requirements for a Social Media inspired educational technology.


2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 299-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Letizia Mortara ◽  
Jonathan Hughes ◽  
Pallant S. Ramsundar ◽  
Finbarr Livesey ◽  
David R. Probert

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document