Effects of Surface Roughness and Rainfall Impact on Overland Flow

1995 ◽  
Vol 121 (7) ◽  
pp. 546-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel M. Katz ◽  
Frederick J. Watts ◽  
Edward R. Burroughs
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia Battista ◽  
Peter Molnar ◽  
Fritz Schlunegger ◽  
Paolo Burlando

<p>The identification of preferential sediment production areas within a river basin is essential to improve predictions of sediment load and its sources, and to identify sources of potential water pollution. The role of these localized sediment sources is especially relevant in the sediment budget of alpine basins, where erosion in highly non-uniform and mass movements play a major role in the mobilization of sediments. While sediment tracers are useful to assess the origin of river-borne sediments, currently very few spatially distributed sediment transport models include the sediment production from a variety of sources and track sediment from source to outlet.</p><p>In this work, we present a new approach to include the production of sediment from localized sources, in addition to diffusive overland flow erosion, in a spatially distributed sediment production and transport model. This extension of the hydrological model Topkapi-ETH simulates the mobilization of sediments by (i) overland flow erosion, (ii) sediment pickup from landsliding areas by overland flow and (iii) river discharge, and (iv) sediment pickup from deeply incised valleys by channel flow. Landslides and incised valleys were identified from geological/geomorphological maps and a high resolution DEM of the study basin. To model the contribution of landslides, we introduce a parameter λ for gully competence, which describes the effectiveness of overland flow in mobilizing the sediments. Overall, λ affects the contributions of the different sediment production processes to the modelled sediment load at the basin outlet. To estimate a value of λ for the case study, we propose the local surface roughness to quantify the gully development onto the landslide surfaces. Additionally, we use available <sup>10</sup>Be measurements across the basin to assign a concentration to each sediment production process and select the end member value of λ that best reproduces the observed <sup>10</sup>Be concentrations at the outlet.</p><p>Our simulations indicate that including the production of sediments from localized sources with processes (ii) to (iv) is essential to capture the highest observed concentrations with the model. Moreover, the same observed suspended sediment concentrations at the outlet may be obtained with different combinations of sediment production processes in function of the gully competence. Finally, the local surface roughness analysis and the use of <sup>10</sup>Be concentration as a sediment tracer suggest that channel processes are dominant over hillslope sediment production in the study basin.</p><p>In conclusion, our work shows that combinations of physically-based sediment transport modelling with geomorphological mapping of localized sediment sources, high-resolution topographic information and point measurements of cosmogenic radionuclide concentrations allow to infer the dominant sediment production processes in river basins.</p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 3221-3229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Nearing ◽  
Viktor O. Polyakov ◽  
Mary H. Nichols ◽  
Mariano Hernandez ◽  
Li Li ◽  
...  

Abstract. Slope–velocity equilibrium is hypothesized as a state that evolves naturally over time due to the interaction between overland flow and surface morphology, wherein steeper areas develop a relative increase in physical and hydraulic roughness such that flow velocity is a unique function of overland flow rate independent of slope gradient. This study tests this hypothesis under controlled conditions. Artificial rainfall was applied to 2 m by 6 m plots at 5, 12, and 20 % slope gradients. A series of simulations were made with two replications for each treatment with measurements of runoff rate, velocity, rock cover, and surface roughness. Velocities measured at the end of each experiment were a unique function of discharge rates, independent of slope gradient or rainfall intensity. Physical surface roughness was greater at steeper slopes. The data clearly showed that there was no unique hydraulic coefficient for a given slope, surface condition, or rainfall rate, with hydraulic roughness greater at steeper slopes and lower intensities. This study supports the hypothesis of slope–velocity equilibrium, implying that use of hydraulic equations, such as Chezy and Manning, in hillslope-scale runoff models is problematic because the coefficients vary with both slope and rainfall intensity.


1980 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 1434-1439 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. H. Podmore ◽  
L. F. Huggins

Soil Research ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 249 ◽  
Author(s):  
PB Hairsine ◽  
CJ Moran ◽  
CW Rose

Recent developments in modelling overland flow and soil erosion, which permit the consilidation of soil surface characteristics, are reviewed. The models of overland flow are found to be sensitive to soil surface micro-topography and surface pore structure. The former affects depressional storage and hydraulic routing and the latter soil hydraulic properties, notably infiltration rate. The models of soil erosion by water are found to be sensitive to surface roughness, strength and the aggregate size distribution, and the deposition characteristics, of the eroded sediment. Methods for describing the roughness of a soil surface are described and the links to the above processes discussed. The implications of new techniques of roughness measurement for this area of research are briefly examined. It is concluded that the new models of erosion and overland flow provide a more realistic description of the influence of soil surface characteristics than previous semi-empirical models. The review identified the case of large form roughness and shallow flow as a poorly described regime. It was also concluded that the relationship between structural degradation and surface roughness warranted investigation.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Nearing ◽  
Viktor O. Polyakov ◽  
Mary H. Nichols ◽  
Mariano Hernandez ◽  
Li Li ◽  
...  

Abstract. Slope–velocity–equilibrium is hypothesized as a state that evolves naturally over time due to the interaction between overland flow and surface morphology, wherein steeper areas develop a relative increase in physical and hydraulic roughness such that flow velocity is a unique function of overland flow rate independent of slope gradient. This study tests this hypothesis under controlled conditions. Artificial rainfall was applied to 2 m by 6 m plots at 5 %, 12 %, and 20 % slope gradients. A series of simulations were made for each treatment with measurements of runoff rate, velocity, rock cover, and surface roughness. Velocities measured at the end of each experiment were a unique function of discharge rates, independent of slope gradient or rainfall intensity. Physical surface roughness was greater at steeper slopes. The data clearly showed that there was not a unique hydraulic coefficient for a given slope, surface condition, or rainfall rate, with hydraulic roughness greater at steeper slopes and lower intensities. This study supports the hypothesis of slope–velocity–equilibrium, implying that use of hydraulic equations, such as Chezy and Manning, in hillslope scale runoff models is problematic because the coefficients vary with both slope and rainfall intensity.


2015 ◽  
Vol 528 ◽  
pp. 192-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrés Peñuela ◽  
Mathieu Javaux ◽  
Charles L. Bielders

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document