Explaining the Formation Mechanism of Intrateam Knowledge Exchange Network in Offsite Construction Projects: A Social Cognitive Perspective

Author(s):  
Kangning Liu ◽  
Yikun Su ◽  
Julien Pollack ◽  
Huakang Liang ◽  
Shoujian Zhang
2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 873-885
Author(s):  
Xiaotong Zheng ◽  
Rosalie J. Hall ◽  
Birgit Schyns

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 1124
Author(s):  
Freddy Marín-González ◽  
Alexa Senior-Naveda ◽  
Mercy Narváez Castro ◽  
Alicia Inciarte González ◽  
Ana Judith Paredes Chacín

This article aims to build a network for the exchange of knowledge between the government and production, community and university sectors for sustainable local development. To achieve this, the authors relied on the concepts of sustainable local development, social capital, the relationship between sectors or intersectorality, networks and interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary knowledge. Regarding the methodology, the abductive method was used. Under a documentary design, the research techniques were a content analysis of theoretical documents and the deductive inference technique. The construction of a knowledge exchange network for sustainable local development stands out as the result. It is concluded that knowledge networks for sustainable local development have positive implications in the establishment of alliances and links between the sectors that make up society.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry Bikas ◽  
Pierre E. C. Johansson ◽  
Rosa Di Falco ◽  
John Stavridis ◽  
Esko Niemi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 307-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
April H. Bailey ◽  
Marianne LaFrance ◽  
John F. Dovidio

Androcentrism refers to the propensity to center society around men and men’s needs, priorities, and values and to relegate women to the periphery. Androcentrism also positions men as the gender-neutral standard while marking women as gender-specific. Examples of androcentrism include the use of male terms (e.g., he), images, and research participants to represent everyone. Androcentrism has been shown to have serious consequences. For example, women’s health has been adversely affected by over-generalized medical research based solely on male participants. Nonetheless, relatively little is known about androcentrism’s proximate psychological causes. In the present review, we propose a social cognitive perspective arguing that both social power and categorization processes are integral to understanding androcentrism. We present and evaluate three possible pathways to androcentrism deriving from (a) men being more frequently instantiated than women, (b) masculinity being more “ideal” than femininity, and/or (c) masculinity being more common than femininity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document