Discussion of “Analysis of Dynamic Wave Model for Unsteady Flow in an Open Channel” by Maurizio Venutelli

2012 ◽  
Vol 138 (10) ◽  
pp. 915-917 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristiana Di Cristo ◽  
Michele Iervolino ◽  
Andrea Vacca
2014 ◽  
Vol 905 ◽  
pp. 369-373
Author(s):  
Choo Tai Ho ◽  
Yoon Hyeon Cheol ◽  
Yun Gwan Seon ◽  
Noh Hyun Suk ◽  
Bae Chang Yeon

The estimation of a river discharge by using a mean velocity equation is very convenient and rational. Nevertheless, a research on an equation calculating a mean velocity in a river was not entirely satisfactory after the development of Chezy and Mannings formulas which are uniform equations. In this paper, accordingly, the mean velocity in unsteady flow conditions which are shown loop form properties was estimated by using a new mean velocity formula derived from Chius 2-D velocity formula. The results showed that the proposed method was more accurate in estimating discharge, when compared with the conventional formulas.


2000 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-337
Author(s):  
Abderrahman Assabbane ◽  
Saad Bennis

The work presented here aims at developing a flow forecast model dedicated to real-time management. The proposed model is based on the notion of a transfer function for a linear system identified through the Kalman filter algorithm. In a first step, the transfer function model is linked to the Muskingum semi-empirical model; then it is modified to eliminate the autoregressive component. The Kalman filter algorithm allows the parameters of the proposed model to be updated upon the reception of each new measure with respect to the forecast errors observed in real time. To analyze the performance of the proposed model, its results are compared with those obtained using the dynamic wave model and the simplified kinematic wave model. Because of the absence of measured downstream flow values corresponding to the input hydrograph, the results from the dynamic wave model are used as reference values to evaluate the performance of the other models. These results are also used with the addition of noises to simulate measured values and feed, in "real-time," the identification algorithm of the transfer function in order to adjust, a posteriori, its parameters according to its differences in the flow prediction. The results obtained by the transfer function model agree with those obtained by the dynamic model following the three performance criteria employed. The Nash coefficient and the ratio between the peak flows are close to unity in all of the cases. Also, the lag between the peak flows estimated by the two models is negligible.Key words: waste water networks, real-time management, flow propagation models, forecast, transfer function, Kalman filter.[Journal Translation]


Author(s):  
Yeonsu KIM ◽  
Yasuto TACHIKAWA ◽  
Sunmin KIM ◽  
Michiharu SHIIBA ◽  
Seong Jin NOH ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document