scholarly journals Comment on ‘‘A quantum mechanical representation in phase space’’ [J. Chem. Phys. 98, 3103 (1993)]

1994 ◽  
Vol 101 (8) ◽  
pp. 7187-7188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xu‐Guang Hu ◽  
Qian‐Shu Li
1995 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 417-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian-Shu Li ◽  
Xu-Guang Hu

1993 ◽  
Vol 98 (4) ◽  
pp. 3103-3120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Go. Torres‐Vega ◽  
John H. Frederick

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (04) ◽  
pp. 1550021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Benatti ◽  
Laure Gouba

When dealing with the classical limit of two quantum mechanical oscillators on a noncommutative configuration space, the limits corresponding to the removal of configuration-space noncommutativity and position-momentum noncommutativity do not commute. We address this behaviour from the point of view of the phase-space localisation properties of the Wigner functions of coherent states under the two limits.


1997 ◽  
Vol 12 (31) ◽  
pp. 5625-5637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anisur Rahaman

A new generalization of the vector Schwinger model is considered where gauge symmetry is broken at the quantum mechanical level. By proper extension of the phase space this broken symmetry has been restored in two different ways. One of these two leads to a BRST-invariant effective action. An equivalent gauge-invariant theory is reformulated even in the usual phase space also.


Author(s):  
M. Springborg ◽  
J. P. Perdew ◽  
K. Schmidt

In the general case, quantum-mechanical quantities are represented by operators in position- or momentum-space representations, but in phase space they are represented by functions. The correspondence between classical mechanics and quantum mechanics is non-unique as a consequence of [


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document