On the relationships between different vortex identification methods based on local trace criterion

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (10) ◽  
pp. 105116
Author(s):  
Yangwei Liu ◽  
Weibo Zhong ◽  
Yumeng Tang
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pushpa Shrestha ◽  
Charles Nottage ◽  
Yifei Yu ◽  
Oscar Alvarez ◽  
Chaoqun Liu

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaoqun Liu ◽  
Yi-sheng Gao ◽  
Xiang-rui Dong ◽  
Yi-qian Wang ◽  
Jian-ming Liu ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 286-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-wen Zhao ◽  
Jian-hua Wang ◽  
De-cheng Wan

2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 075101 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. B. Bryant ◽  
D.-G. Seol ◽  
S. A. Socolofsky

Author(s):  
Reza M. Ziazi ◽  
Navid Goudarzi

Abstract This erratum corrects errors that appeared in the paper “A Tomographic PIV Study and Comparison of Vortex Identification Methods on NACA 63-215 Hydrofoil Wake Structure” which was published in Proceedings of the ASME-JSME-KSME 2019 8th Joint Fluids Engineering Conference, Volume 4: Fluid Measurement and Instrumentation; Micro and Nano Fluid Dynamics, (V004T04A014), July–August 2019, AJKFluids2019-5550, doi: 10.1115/AJKFluids2019-5550.


2020 ◽  
pp. 2150111
Author(s):  
Shuheng Qu ◽  
Jinping Li ◽  
Huaiyu Cheng ◽  
Bin Ji

The sheet/cloud cavitating flow always contains complex multiscale vortex structures generated by the cavity cloud shedding and collapsing. In this study, the transient sheet/cloud cavitating flow around a Clark-Y hydrofoil is numerically investigated using the Large Eddy Simulation (LES) method coupled with the Zwart–Gerber–Belamri (ZGB) cavitation model. The simulation accurately reproduces the unsteady cavitation evolution process, and the predicted time-averaged lift and drag coefficients, total vapor volume variation and velocity distribution agree fairly well with the experimental measurements. The cavitation vortex dynamics are studied in detail with different vortex identification methods including the vorticity method, the [Formula: see text]-criterion method, the [Formula: see text] method, the [Formula: see text] method and the Liutex method. The vortex identification ability of the different methods in the transient sheet/cloud cavitating flow is also discussed. Generally, the Liutex method combines the advantages of the other methods and can accurately identify both the vortex position and strength. Further analysis of cavitation-vortex interactions demonstrates that the cavity cloud shedding and collapsing have a pronounced influence on the vortex structure.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 649
Author(s):  
Zhen Ren ◽  
Jianhua Wang ◽  
Decheng Wan

Planar motion mechanism (PMM) tests provide a means of obtaining the hydrodynamic derivatives needed to assess ship maneuverability properties. In this paper, the self-developed computational fluid dynamic (CFD) solver based on the open source code platform OpenFOAM, naoe-FOAM-SJTU, associated with the overset grid method is used to simulate the complex viscous flow field of PMM tests for a benchmark model Yupeng Ship. This paper discusses the effect of several parameters such as the drift angle and period on the hydrodynamic performance of the ship and compares the time histories of the predicted forces and moments with experimental data. To investigate the complex viscous flows with a large separation, four vortex identification methods are used to capture the vortex structures. The results show that the forces and moments are in good agreement in static drift and dynamic tests. By comparing the vortex structures, it is found that the third generation vortex identification methods, OmegaR and Liutex, are able to more accurately capture the vortex structures. The paper concludes that the present numerical scheme is reliable and the third generation vortex identification methods are more suitable for displaying the vortex structures in a complex viscous flow field.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document