The Determinants of Illusory-Contour Perception

Perception ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane F Halpern

The term ‘illusory contours' refers to contours perceived where none physically exist. Three hypotheses that have been successful in their ability to account for this phenomenon invoke: (i) apparent depth; (ii) brightness contrast; and (iii) use of figural cues. An experiment has been designed to determine the extent to which each hypothesis accounts for the overall variation in subjects' responses to illusory contours when all three hypotheses are considered simultaneously. Experimental results suggest that different processes may assume a primary role in the perception of illusory contours depending upon the type of inducing area and the configuration. The results highlight the multifaceted nature of the processes involved, and indicate that no single theory can explain the perception of illusory contours.

Perception ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane F Halpern ◽  
Billie Salzman

Four theories of illusory-contour perception are reviewed—brightness contrast (simultaneous contrast, assimilation, and dissimilation), depth/completion, partial activation of neural feature analyzers, and the diffuse—sharp dichotomy. It is concluded that the processes and mechanisms involved in illusory-contour perception most likely depend upon the stimulus elements used in the illusory-contour display.


Perception ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane F Halpern ◽  
Billie Salzman ◽  
Wayne Harrison ◽  
Keith Widaman

Judgments of contour strength or saliency for twenty-four illusory-contour configurations were subjected to a confirmatory factor analysis. A four-factor model that posited the involvement of simultaneous contrast, linear effects (assimilation and dissimilation), depth/completion cues, and feature analyzers accounted for a substantial proportion of the variance in judgments of illusory-contour strength. The hierarchical addition of a fifth factor, diffuse illusory contours, significantly improved the overall fit of the model, but added little to the proportion of explained variance. The taxonomic approach adopted provides support for a multiprocess model of illusory-contour perception.


Perception ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 485-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ross H Day ◽  
Richard T Kasperczyk

An illusory contour along a partially delineated border in the form of an apparent ‘outside’ corner due to perspective was as strong as one along a similarly delineated border in the form of an edge due to overlay. An illusory contour along a border in the form of an apparent ‘inside’ corner, due probably to both perspective and overlay, was stronger than either. These outcomes suggest that apparent stratification from overlay is not necessary for the occurrence of illusory contours. They also accord with the view that apparent depth due to overlay or to perspective is equally effective in rendering partially delineated borders more prominent and, in consequence, the illusory contours that form along them stronger.


Perception ◽  
10.1068/p3016 ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 303-312
Author(s):  
Marc K Albert ◽  
Donald D Hoffman

Visual images are ambiguous. Any image, or collection of images, is consistent with an infinite number of possible scenes in the world. Yet we are generally unaware of this ambiguity. During ordinary perception we are generally aware of only one, or perhaps a few of these possibilities. Human vision evidently exploits certain constraints—assumptions about the world and images formed of it—in order to generate its perceptions. One constraint that has been widely studied by researchers in human and machine vision is the generic-viewpoint assumption. We show that this assumption can help to explain the widely discussed fact that outlines of blobs are ineffective inducers of illusory contours. We also present a number of novel effects and report an experiment suggesting that the generic-viewpoint assumption strongly influences illusory-contour perception.


Perception ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 513-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeo Watanabe ◽  
Tadasu Oyama

The causal flows between the processes responsible for illusory contour clarity, brightness, and apparent depth in the Kanizsa square were examined. The sixty-four stimuli used consisted of all possible combinations of eight disk luminances and eight centre-to-centre separations between nearest disks. Ten subjects were instructed to rate the clarity of the illusory contour and the brightness and apparent depth differences between the Kanizsa square and its surround in each stimulus. On the basis of results obtained with the causal inference method, using partial correlations and path analysis, it is suggested that clarity of illusory contour can be influenced directly by disk separation, and that the output from the process responsible for illusory contour clarity has some effect on the processes responsible for the apparent depth and brightness differences.


2010 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Dillenburger ◽  
Anna W. Roe

Real lines and illusory contours (ICs) have been reported to either interfere with or facilitate the perception of the other, depending on real line orientation and contrast. Here we investigate contextual effects of real lines on illusory contour perception. Curvature discrimination thresholds of Kanizsa-contours were measured for superimposed real lines of different sub- and suprathreshold contrasts. We find that parallel lines interfere with curvature discrimination at suprathreshold, whereas orthogonal lines interfere at subthreshold contrasts. We did not find stable facilitating effects of lines in any orientation or contrast. These results are discussed in relation to existing physiological and imaging data.


Emotion ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 856-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thorsten M. Erle ◽  
Rolf Reber ◽  
Sascha Topolinski

The human visual system sees an illusory contour where there is a fault line across a regular striped pattern. We demonstrate that bees respond as if they see the same illusory contour. There is also a type of neuron in the lobula of the dragonfly optic lobe which responds directionally to motion of the illusory contour as if to an edge or line. Apparently insects have a mechanism that sees illusory contours and therefore assists in the demarcation of edges and objects at places where local contrast falls to zero at an edge, or where one textured object partially obscures another. These results suggest that insect vision, although spatially crude and low in processing power, sees separate objects by similar mechanisms to our own.


1999 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 4024-4036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas Larsson ◽  
Katrin Amunts ◽  
Balázs Gulyás ◽  
Aleksandar Malikovic ◽  
Karl Zilles ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 131 ◽  
pp. 38-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kritika Nayar ◽  
John Franchak ◽  
Karen Adolph ◽  
Lynne Kiorpes

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document