Flicker-Defined Forms in the Ternus Display

Perception ◽  
10.1068/p7919 ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 315-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Molly R Silva ◽  
J Timothy Petersik
Keyword(s):  

Perception ◽  
10.1068/p5670 ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 37 (12) ◽  
pp. 1790-1804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darko Odic ◽  
Jay Pratt

The Ternus display produces a bistable illusion of motion: at very short interstimulus intervals (ISIs; < 30 ms) observers perceive element motion while at longer ISIs (> 30 ms) observers perceive group motion. In experiment 1, however, we find that, when the Ternus display's ISI contains an occluding box, group motion is mostly eliminated. These results do not fit the predictions made by the short-range/long-range two-process theory [Braddick and Adlard, 1978, in Visual Psychophysics and Psychology (New York: Academic Press)]. We propose that the differential-activation theory (Gilroy et al, 2001 Perception & Psychophysics63 847–861) accounts for our results. We then extend the differential-activation theory as an explanatory mechanism for the Ternus display in experiment 2 by selectively placing an occluder over the first, second, or third Ternus display element. As predicted by the differential-activation theory, the occlusion of the far-left element produced a normal distribution of group motion increasing with ISI, while the occlusion of the other two elements produced an illusion of occluded elements remaining stationary throughout the display. Furthermore, as predicted by the differential-activation theory, each moving element was assigned to its nearest neighbour, producing, in the case of second and third element occlusion, a novel Ternus display motion illusion where only two out of three elements are perceived as moving.



2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 61-61
Author(s):  
E. Hein ◽  
A. Hollingworth ◽  
C. M. Moore


2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 156-156
Author(s):  
N. E. Scott-Samuel ◽  
R. F. Hess


2002 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 1005-1016 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Alais ◽  
Jean Lorenceau


Perception ◽  
10.1068/p3444 ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 669-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Ma-Wyatt ◽  
Colin W G Clifford ◽  
Peter Wenderoth

We investigated whether the same principles that influence grouping in static displays also influence grouping in apparent motion. Using the Ternus display, we found that the proportion of group motion reports was influenced by changes in contrast configuration. Subjects made judgments of completion of these same configurations in a static display. Generally, contrast configurations that induced a high proportion of group motion responses were judged as more ‘complete’ in static displays. Using a stereo display, we then tested whether stereo information and T-junction information were critical for this increase in group motion. Perceived grouping was consistently higher for same contrast polarity configurations than for opposite contrast polarity configurations, regardless of the presence of stereo information or explicit T-junctions. Thus, while grouping in static and moving displays showed a similar dependence on contrast configuration, motion grouping showed little dependence on stereo or T-junction information.



1997 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Kramer ◽  
Steven Yantis


2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 16-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Hein ◽  
P. Cavanagh


2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 374-374
Author(s):  
A. Ma Wyatt ◽  
C. W.G. Clifford ◽  
P. Wenderoth
Keyword(s):  


Perception ◽  
10.1068/p2941 ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 877-892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zijiang J He ◽  
Teng Leng Ooi


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document