104 FACTORS AFFECTING PREGNANCY RATES AND EMBRYO/FETAL LOSSES IN RECIPIENTS RECEIVING IN VITRO-PRODUCED EMBRYOS BY FIXED-TIME EMBRYO TRANSFER

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 160
Author(s):  
A. Tribulo ◽  
A. Cedeño ◽  
B. Bernal ◽  
S. Andrada ◽  
J. L. Barajas ◽  
...  

A retrospective analysis evaluated pregnancy rates and embryo losses with in vitro-produced embryos in a commercial embryo transfer program on 15 different beef farms. Recipients were beef cows and heifers (n = 1841) that were synchronized with 5 different protocols and transferred at a fixed-time (FTET). Recipients were examined by ultrasonography on Day 0, and those with a corpus luteum (CL) or a follicle ≥8 mm in diameter and with body condition score 2 to 4 (1 to 5 scale) were synchronized. The synchronization treatments were as follows. (T1) Recipients received an intravaginal device with 0.5 g of progesterone plus 2 mg of oestradiol benzoate on Day 0; device removal, plus 500 μg of cloprostenol (prostaglandin F2α), 400 IU of eCG, and 0.5 mg of oestradiol cypionate on Day 8; and FTET on Day 17. (T2) This treatment was similar to T1 but 1 mg of oestradiol cypionate was injected at device removal instead of 0.5 mg of oestradiol cypionate. (T3) This treatment was similar to T1 except that animals were tail-painted on Day 8 and observed on Day 10. Those with the tail-paint intact on Day 10 received 100 μg of gonadorelin (gonadotropin-releasing hormone) and all recipients were FTET on Day 17. (T4) Recipients received a progesterone device on Day 0; device removal, prostaglandin F2α, and eCG on Day 5; gonadotropin-releasing hormone on Day 8; and FTET on Day 15. (T5) Recipients received a progesterone device and 2 mg of oestradiol benzoate on Day 0; device removal, prostaglandin F2α, and eCG on Day 6; gonadotropin-releasing hormone on Day 9; and FTET on Day 16. On the day of FTET all recipients with CL ≥18 mm in diameter (G1), ≥16 and <18 mm in diameter (G2), and ≥14 mm and <16 mm in diameter (G3) received in vitro-produced fresh embryos. Pregnancy was diagnosed by ultrasonography at 30 and 60 days of gestation, and data were analysed by logistic regression. The overall proportion of recipients synchronized that were FTET was 80.8% (1487/1841), with a 30-day pregnancy rate to FTET (P/FTET) of 45.6% (678/1487) and the rate of 30- to 60-day embryo/fetal loses on the 528 recipients that were re-checked at 60 days was 12.8% (68/528). There were no significant differences in P/FTET among operators, animal category, time of the year, embryo stage, or body condition score; however, there was a significant effect of farm (P < 0.001) and CL diameter (P < 0.05), but no interaction between CL diameter and farm or treatment (P > 0.1). Recipients with G1 (443/953, 46%) and G2 (221/462, 47%) CL had higher pregnancy rates than those with G3 CL (23/71, 32%). There was a significant effect of synchronization treatment on the proportion of recipients transferred and on P/FTET (P < 0.01) that was highly influenced by farm (farm by treatment interaction P < 0.01). The proportions of recipients selected for embryo transfer were as follows: T1: 386/486, 79.4%; T2: 233/331, 70.3%; T3: 342/377, 90.7%; T4: 126/160, 78.7%; and T5: 400/487, 82.1%. The P/FTET were as follows: T1: 190/386, 49.2%; T2: 96/233, 41.2%; T3: 175/342, 51.1%; T4: 49/126, 38.8%; and T5: 168/400, 42.0%. Although 30- to 60-day embryo/fetal losses were not influenced by synchronization treatments, they were highly influenced by farm (P < 0.001) and ranged from 0 to 34.5%. In conclusion, P/FTET in a commercial program with beef in vitro-produced embryos was influenced by factors related to the recipient (CL diameter) and the environment (farm), whereas embryo/fetal losses were influenced by farm but not treatment or recipient factors.


2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 159 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Cedeño ◽  
A. Tribulo ◽  
S. Andrada ◽  
J. L. Barajas ◽  
J. Fonseca ◽  
...  

An experiment was designed to evaluate whether expression of oestrus in recipients synchronized with progesterone devices and oestradiol affects pregnancy rates to a fixed-time embryo transfer (FTET). A secondary objective was to determine whether administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) to those recipients not showing oestrus by 48 h after device removal had an effect on pregnancy rates. Mature, non-lactating beef recipients (Bonsmara, Brangus, and Braford; n = 729), with a corpus luteum (CL) or a follicle ≥8 mm in diameter detected by ultrasonography (Mindray DP 30, Shenzhen, China) and body condition score 2 to 4 (1 to 5 scale) were synchronized in 7 replicates. On Day 0, recipients received a progesterone device (DIB 0.5 g, Zoetis, Buenos Aires, Argentina) and 2 mg of oestradiol benzoate (Gonadiol, Zoetis). On Day 8, DIB were removed and recipients received 400 IU eCG (Novormon 5000, Zoetis) plus 0.5 mg of oestradiol cypionate (Cipiosyn, Zoetis) and 500 μg of cloprostenol (Cyclase, Zoetis). In addition, all cows were tail-painted on the sacrococcygeal area (CeloTest, Biotay, Buenos Aires, Argentina) at DIB removal and were observed to determine the expression of oestrus, according to the percentage of paint loss 48 h later. The animals that showed oestrus (paint loss >30%) were recorded, and those with paint loss ≤30% (not in oestrus) were randomly allocated to receive 100 μg of gonadorelin (GnRH; Gonasyn, Zoetis) or no treatment. On Day 17, all recipients were examined by ultrasonography and those with a CL ≥18 mm (G1), ≥16 and <18 mm (G2), or ≥14 and <16 mm (G3) in diameter received in vivo-produced frozen-thawed embryos by direct transfer or fresh in vitro-produced embryos. Pregnancy was diagnosed by ultrasonography at 23 days after FTET, and data were analysed by logistic regression. There were no differences between replicates, in vivo- and in vitro-produced embryos, or operators (P > 0.2). However, the proportion of recipients transferred and pregnant (P/FTET) was higher (P < 0.05) for those that showed oestrus at 48 h after DIB removal (422/454, 93.0% and 227/471, 48.2%) than those that did not show oestrus (109/211, 51.7% and 45/120, 37.5%). Within the recipients not showing oestrus, P/FTET was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in those that received GnRH (34/74, 45.9%) than in those that did not receive GnRH (12/46, 26.1%). There was a significant interaction (P < 0.05) between CL diameter and expression of oestrus. When recipients had CL ≥18 mm in diameter (G1), P/FTET did not differ (oestrus: 164/338, 48.5% v. no oestrus 30/65, 46.2%); however, when CL diameter was <18 mm and ≥14 mm (G2 and G3), P/FTET was higher (P < 0.05) in those that showed oestrus (37/85, 43.5%) than in those that did not show oestrus (11/43, 25.6%). Finally, P/FTET was higher (P < 0.05) in recipients with a CL (268/573, 46.8%) on Day 0 than in those with follicles >8 mm in diameter (4/18, 22.2%). In conclusion, the expression of oestrus significantly affected the percentage of recipients selected for embryo transfer and P/FTET. Furthermore, treatment of recipients not showing oestrus by 48 h after DIB removal with GnRH at that time increased P/FTET.



2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 184
Author(s):  
M. Pelizzari ◽  
A. Tribulo ◽  
J. Garzon ◽  
B. Bernal ◽  
R. Tribulo ◽  
...  

A retrospective analysis of factors that affect pregnancy rates from 4214 fresh in vitro-produced (IVP) embryos that were transferred at a fixed-time (FTET) in 20 different farms. Recipients were all cycling cows or heifers that were synchronized with 1 of 3 treatments: 1) treatments with progesterone (P4) devices and 2 mg of oestradiol benzoate (EB) on Day 0 (day of insertion) and 24 h after device removal (Day 8); 2) treatments with P4 devices and EB on Day 0, but with 0.5 mg of oestradiol cypionate (ECP) at device removal (Day 8); or 3) treatments with P4 devices and GnRH on Day 0 and a second GnRH 60 h after device removal (Day 5). Cows in all treatment groups also received 500 µg of cloprostenol (prostaglandin F2α) at the time of P4 device removal and 400 IU of eCG either at device removal or 3 days before device removal. All embryos were transferred 7 or 8 days after the expected time of oestrus (24 h after EB, 48 h after ECP or at the time of the second GNRH for each synchronization treatment, respectively). On the day of embryo transfer, recipients were examined by ultrasonography and those with corpus luteum >14 mm in diameter received a fresh, IVP embryo in the uterine horn ipsilateral to the corpus luteum. Pregnancy rates were determined by ultrasonography 35 days after FTET. Data were analysed by logistic regression. Independent variables were classified into the following three categories. 1) Factors related to the recipient and the environment; there were no significant differences in pregnancy rates for corpus luteum diameter (≥14 and <16 mm, ≥16 and <18 mm, or ≥18 mm; P = 0.46), number of corpus luteum (1 or ≥2; P = 0.26), and category of recipient (cow or heifer; P = 0.21). However, there were significant effects of farm (P = 0.01) and body condition score (BCS; P = 0.01). Cows with BCS ≥4.5 (1 to 5 scale) resulted in lower pregnancy rates (4/20, 20.0%) than those with BCS 2 (74/225, 32.9%), 2.5 (502/1434, 35.0%), 3 (570/1467, 38.9%), 3.5 (193/532, 36.3%), and 4 (44/118, 37.3%). 2) Factors related to the synchronization treatment; there were no significant differences between recipients receiving eCG at device removal (84/209, 40.2%) or 3 days before device removal (874/2291, 38.1%; P = 0.35). However, recipients synchronized with P4 devices and ECP had higher (P = 0.01) pregnancy rates (232/483, 48.0%) than those treated with EB (679/1888, 36.0%) or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (47/129, 36.4%). 3) Factors related to the embryo transfer technique; day of the recipient’s oestrous cycle (P = 0.36), stage of embryo transferred (IETS stages 6 or 7; P = 0.62), and operator (P = 0.57) did not affect pregnancy rates. However transfers made in the anterior third of the uterine horn resulted in higher (649/1545, 42.0%) pregnancy rates than those in the mid-third (845/2511, 33.6%) or in the distal third (6/35, 17.1%; P = 0.01). It was concluded that factors related to the recipient and the environment (farm and BCS), the synchronization treatment (ECP), and the embryo transfer technique (site of deposition) affect pregnancy rates in recipients of embryos produced in vitro and transferred at a fixed time.



2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 185 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Garcia-Guerra ◽  
R. V. Sala ◽  
G. M. Baez ◽  
M. Fosado ◽  
L. F. Melo ◽  
...  

The hypothesis was that GnRH on Day 5 of a synchronized cycle in embryo transfer recipients would increase progesterone (P4) concentrations, embryo size, and fertility. Holstein and cross-bred Holstein heifers (n = 1562) were synchronized using a modified 5-day CIDR Co-Synch as follows: Day –8 CIDR inserted; Day –3 CIDR removed; prostaglandin F2α treatment; Day –2 second prostaglandin F2α; Day 0 gonadotropin-releasing hormone (G1, 100 μg of gonadorelin acetate) to induce ovulation. On Day 5.5, heifers were assigned in a completely randomised design to 1 of 2 treatments: Control (untreated) or GnRH (200 μg of gonadorelin acetate). Transfer of fresh in vitro-produced embryos was performed between d 6 and 8 after G1. Data collected from each heifer included embryo stage and quality, body condition score, technician, interval from G1 to transfer, and number of previous transfers. All heifers were evaluated by transrectal ultrasonography on Day 5, 33, and 62 and a subset of heifers was scanned on Day 12 (n = 718; to determine ovulation to treatment) and another subset on Day 33 (n = 296; 16-s video to determine embryo and amniotic vesicle size). Serum P4 was determined from a subset of heifers on Day 12 (n = 467). Fertility data were analysed by logistic regression (LOGISTIC procedure, SAS 9.4), whereas continuous outcomes were analysed by ANOVA (MIXED procedure). Ovulation to Day 5.5 gonadotropin-releasing hormone was 83.9% (302/360) in GnRH-treated heifers v. 3.3% (12/358) in Control (P < 0.001). Progesterone on Day 12 was greater in GnRH-treated heifers 7.2 ± 0.1 ng mL–1 v. Controls 6.0 ± 0.1 ng mL–1 (P < 0.001). There was an effect of embryo stage at Day 33 and 60 of pregnancy, with Stage 7 having greater P/ET than Stage 6 embryos. Treatment with GnRH did not alter pregnancy per embryo transfer with either embryo stage but decreased pregnancy loss in Stage 7 embryos, as shown in Table 1. Embryo size measured as crown-rump length (CRL) did not differ, as shown in Table 1. Similarly, amniotic vesicle volume (AVV) was not different between GnRH (549.1 ± 16 mm3) and Control (543.5 ± 14 mm3; P = 0.86), nor was there an interaction between treatment and embryo stage (P = 0.71). In addition, neither AVV (P = 0.22) nor CRL (P = 0.41) were associated with pregnancy loss between Day 33 and 60. In conclusion, treatment with GnRH on Day 5 resulted in increased P4 and a reduction in pregnancy loss in heifers receiving a Stage 7 embryo without changing conceptus size. Table 1.Pregnancies per embryo transfer (P/ET), crown-rump length (CRL), and pregnancy loss in embryo recipients receiving gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) on Day 5.5 v. control



2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 96 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. de la Mata ◽  
M. Ré ◽  
G. A. Bó

Studies have shown that gonadotropin-releasing hormone-based protocols that reduce the period of progestin insertion and prolong the period from progestin removal to gonadotropin-releasing hormone and fixed-time AI (FTAI; named 5-day Co-Synch) results in similar or higher pregnancy rates than the conventional 7-day Co-Synch protocol in beef cows and heifers (Bridges et al. 2008 Theriogenology 69, 843–851). Similar findings have been reported following the use of an oestradiol-based protocol that also provides for a longer period of proestrus (named J-Synch; de la Mata and Bó 2012 Taurus 55, 17–23). An experiment was designed to compare the J-Synch protocol for synchronization of ovulation that allows for a prolonged proestrus with a conventional 7-day oestradiol-based protocol for FTAI in heifers. Cycling 18-month old Angus and Hereford heifers (n = 208) with a body condition score of 6 to 7 (scale of 1 to 9) were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 treatment groups. Heifers in the 7-day EB group (n = 105) received a progesterone (P4) device (DIB 0.5 g of P4, Syntex SA, Buenos Aires, Argentina) and 2 mg of oestradiol benzoate (EB, Syntex SA) on Day 0 and 500 μg of cloprostenol (PGF; Ciclase DL, Syntex SA) and 0.5 mg oestradiol cypionate (Cipiosyn, Syntex SA) on the day of DIB removal (Day 7). Heifers were also tail painted at the time of DIB removal and observed for signs of oestrus (i.e. tail paint rubbed off). Those with the tail paint rubbed off by 36 h after DIB removal were inseminated 12 h later, whereas those not showing oestrus by 36 h were FTAI at 54 h. Heifers in the J-Synch group (n = 103) received DIB and 2 mg of EB on Day 0 and PGF on the day of DIB removal (Day 6). Heifers in this group were also tail painted at DIB removal, and those with their tail paint rubbed off by 48 h were inseminated 12 h later; those not showing oestrus by 60 h received 100 μg of gonadorelin acetate (gonadotropin-releasing hormone, Gonasyn gdr, Syntex SA) and were FTAI at 72 h after DIB removal. Pregnancy was diagnosed by ultrasonography at 55 days after FTAI (Honda 101V, 5.0-MHz transducer). Data were analysed by logistic regression. Oestrus detection rate and pregnancy rate to FTAI did not differ (P > 0.1) between groups (38.8%, 40/103 and 60.3%, 38/ 63 for heifers in the J-Synch group v. 28.5%, 30/105 and 45.3%, 34/75 for those in the 7-day EB group). However, pregnancy rates to observed oestrus tended (P < 0.09) to be higher and the overall pregnancy rate was significantly higher (P < 0.01) in heifers in the J-Synch group (80.0%, 32/40 and 67.9%, 70 /103) compared with those in 7-day EB group (50%, 15/30 and 46.6%, 49/105). Furthermore, heifers within the J-Synch group that had their tail paint rubbed off by 48 h after DIB removal and were AI 12 h later (i.e. 60 h) had higher (P < 0.05) pregnancy rate than those in the same group that were FTAI. In conclusion, reducing the time of progestin device insertion and lengthening the proestrus period, as in the J-Synch protocol, results in higher pregnancy rates than with the conventional oestradiol-based protocol. Furthermore, the combination of oestrus detection and FTAI would appear to improve the pregnancy outcome even more.



Author(s):  
Abubakr O. Ismail ◽  
◽  
Erneo B. Ochi ◽  
Ambrose S. Jubara ◽  
Bakri Ahmed A/Rahim ◽  
...  

A comparative hormonal study of prostaglandin, gonadotropin releasing hormone and their combination was conducted on 30 randomly selected cross-bred dairy cows of SEMEX project for artificial insemination in Hillat Kuku, Khartoum North, Sudan. The study attempts to determine the response of the animals to hormonal induction and synchronization of estrous as well as fertility following fixed time artificial insemination. Three treatment groups of 10 cows each were undertaken. Groups 1, 2 and 3 involved administration of prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α), gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) and a combination of PGF2α + GnRH, respectively. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. The results revealed that all the three protocols induced and synchronized estrous were almost synchronous in all the treated groups. However, protocol 3 revealed a significantly (p<0.05) better result of 70% pregnancy rate compared to other two protocols that equally provided 50% pregnancy rates. The study resolves that protocol 3 be highly recommended to change the mindset of farmers about the spread of reproductive technology in Sudan. Protocols 1 and 2 provided acceptable pregnancy rates that can be enhanced with the improvement of management.



2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 96 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Menchaca ◽  
R. Nuñez-Olivera ◽  
F. Cuadro ◽  
G. Bo

An oestradiol-based protocol (named J-Synch) has been developed recently with the aim of providing for a longer proestrus, enhancing the development of the dominant follicle before ovulation, and increasing pregnancy rates following fixed-time AI (FTAI) in heifers (de la Matta and Bo 2012 Taurus 55, 17–23). Two experiments were performed in Uruguay with 1953 Angus × Hereford crossbred heifers to compare pregnancy rates obtained with the J-Synch protocol with the conventional 7-day oestradiol-based protocol. A secondary objective was to determine the effects of the time of FTAI and the addition of eCG at the time progestin device removal on pregnancy rates. In Experiment 1, 966 heifers received a DIB device (0.5 g of progesterone, Syntex, Buenos Aires, Argentina) plus 2 mg of oestradiol benzoate IM (Syntex) on Day 0. Heifers in the conventional treatment group (n = 485) received cloprostenol (500 μg, Ciclase DL, Syntex) and oestradiol cypionate (0.5 mg, Cipiosyn, Syntex) IM and had their DIB removed on Day 7 a.m. Heifers in this group were then subdivided to be FTAI on Day 9 a.m. or p.m. (i.e. 48 or 56 h after DIB removal). Heifers in the J-Synch treatment group (n = 481) received cloprostenol IM and DIB removal on Day 6 p.m. and received gonadotropin-releasing hormone (100 μg gonadorelin acetate, Gonasyn Gdr, Syntex) on Day 9 a.m.; heifers were then FTAI on Day 9 a.m. or p.m. (i.e. 60 or 72 h after DIB removal). All heifers in this experiment were also treated with 300 IU of eCG (Novormon, Syntex) at DIB removal. In Experiment 2, 987 heifers were treated with the J-Synch protocol as described in Experiment 1. At device removal (Day 6 p.m.), heifers were divided to receive (n = 488) or not (n = 499) 300 IU of eCG IM at that time and were further subdivided to receive gonadotropin-releasing hormone and FTAI on Day 9 a.m. or p.m. (i.e. 60 or 72 h after DIB removal). Pregnancy rates were determined by ultrasonography 30 days after FTAI. Data were analysed using logistic regression, and results are shown in Table 1. J-Synch-treated heifers tended (P < 0.1) to have higher pregnancy rates following FTAI, whereas time of FTAI only affected pregnancy rates following the conventional 7-day treatment (P < 0.05). However, removal of eCG from the J-Synch protocol in Experiment 2 resulted in reduced pregnancy rates when inseminations were done on Day 9 p.m. (P < 0.05). In summary, the addition of eCG to the J-Synch protocol provided for a wider window of insemination times facilitating FTAI in large groups of beef heifers. Table 1.Effect of length of progestin insertion, time of insemination and eCG treatment on pregnancy rates in beef heifers



2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 111 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. A. Bó ◽  
A. Cedeño ◽  
A. Tribulo ◽  
S. Andrada ◽  
R. Tribulo ◽  
...  

We have previously shown that expression of oestrus significantly influences the time of ovulation and pregnancy rates to timed-AI (P/TAI) in beef cattle synchronized with progesterone devices and oestradiol (Bó et al. 2016 Theriogenology 86, 388–396). Furthermore, delaying TAI from 48 h to 54–58 h after device removal improved P/TAI of those animals not showing oestrus by 48 h. The objective of the present study was to determine whether the administration of GnRH to those animals not showing oestrus by 48 h after device removal had an impact on P/TAI. Non-lactating and suckled beef cows and heifers (Bonsmara, Brangus, and Braford; n = 868), with a corpus luteum (CL) or a follicle ≥8 mm in diameter detected by ultrasonography (Mindray DP 30 Vet, 7.5 MHz, China) and body condition score 2 to 4 (1 to 5 scale) were synchronized in 3 replicates. On Day 0, animals received a progesterone device (DIB 0.5 g, Zoetis, Argentina) and 2 mg of oestradiol benzoate (Von Franken, Argentina). On Day 8, DIB were removed and cows received 0.150 mg of D+cloprostenol (Río de Janeiro, Argentina) plus 0.5 mg oestradiol cypionate (Cipiosyn, Zoetis). In addition, all cows were tail-painted on the sacrococcygeal area (CeloTest, Biotay, Argentina) at DIB removal and were observed to determine the expression of oestrus, according to the percentage of paint loss (PL) 48 h later. The animals that showed oestrus (PL > 30%) were recorded and TAI at that time while those with PL ≤ 30% (not in oestrus) were randomly allocated to receive 100 μg of gonadorelin (GnRH; Gonasyn, Zoetis) or no treatment and TAI between 54 to 58 h after DIB removal. Pregnancy was diagnosed by ultrasonography at 45 days after TAI, and data were analysed by logistic regression. There were no significant differences among replicates, inseminators, semen source or animal class (dry cows, suckled cows or heifers; P > 0.11). However, animals showing oestrus by 48 h after DIB removal had higher P/TAI (371/666; 55.7; P < 0.04) than those that did not show oestrus (96/202; 47.5%). Within animals not showing oestrus at 48 h, those that were in oestrus by the TAI at 54 to 58 h had higher P/TAI (71/124, 57.3%; P < 0.01) than those that did not show oestrus within that period (27/78; 34.6%). In addition, P/TAI was higher (P < 0.01) in animals that received GnRH (66/113; 58.4%) than in those that did not receive GnRH (30/89; 33.7%). In conclusion, the expression of oestrus significantly affected P/TAI in beef cattle synchronized with progesterone devices and oestradiol. Furthermore, treatment of animals not showing oestrus by 48 h after DIB removal with GnRH resulted in improved P/TAI performed 6 to 10 h later.



2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 213
Author(s):  
G. A. Bo ◽  
A. Cedeño ◽  
R. Maingón ◽  
J. P. Cedeño ◽  
H. Gamboa ◽  
...  

An experiment was designed to evaluate the effect of the length of insertion of a progesterone (P4)-releasing device and the length of pro-oestrus on follicular and luteal characteristics and pregnancy rates to AI (P/AI) in Bos indicus heifers treated with oestradiol/P4-based treatments. Bos indicus beef heifers (n=374), 22-26 months of age, with a corpus luteum (CL) or at least one follicle ≥8mm in diameter and with a body condition score between 2.5 and 3.5 (1-to-5 scale) were synchronised using three treatments for fixed-time AI (FTAI). On Day 0, all heifers received 2mg of oestradiol benzoate (Sincrodiol, Ourofino) and an intravaginal device with 1g of P4 (Sincrogest, Ourofino). The P4 device was removed on Day 6 in heifers in the J-Synch 6 group (n=120) and on Day 7 in heifers in the J-Synch 7 group (n=105) and conventional group (n=165). All heifers received 500μg of cloprostenol (Sincrocio, Ourofino) and 300IU of equine chorionic gonadotrophin (SincroeCG 6000UI, Ourofino) at the time of P4 device removal. Furthermore, heifers in the conventional treatment group received 0.5mg of oestradiol cypionate (SincroCP, Ourofino) at the same time. In addition, all heifers were tail-painted for oestrus detection (CeloTest, Biotay). Heifers that had lost ≥50% of the tail paint by 70-74h (J-Synch groups) or 48-52h (conventional group) after device removal were FTAI at that time. Heifers not showing oestrus by 70-74h (J-Synch groups) or 48-52h (conventional group) received 10μg of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (Sincroforte, Ourofino) at the same time and were FTAI 8h later. All heifers were also examined using ultrasonography (Mindray DP50 Vet) every 12h from the time of device removal to determine the time of ovulation, 6 days after ovulation to determine the diameter of the CL, and 28 days after FTAI for P/AI determination. Data were analysed using the MLGM procedure (InfoStat) for normal data families (follicular dynamics) and binary data family (P/AI). The results are shown in Table 1. The diameter of the dominant preovulatory follicle and the CL did not differ among groups (P&gt;0.12). However, the interval from device removal to ovulation was longer in heifers in the J-Synch groups than in heifers in the conventional group (P&lt;0.05). Furthermore, P/AI was not different among groups. In conclusion, although the J-Synch protocols delayed the interval from P4 device removal to ovulation, the three protocols evaluated in the present study were equally effective in Bos indicus heifers. Table 1.Mean (±s.e.m.) diameter of the preovulatory follicle (P/Foll) and corpus luteum (CL), interval from progesterone (P4) device removal to ovulation, and pregnancy rates to AI (P/AI) in Bos indicus heifers Treatment P/Foll, mm Interval to ovulation, h CL diameter, mm P/AI,% (n) J-Synch 6 10.5±0.7 101.4±2.3a 18.6±1.0 52.0 (62/120) J-Synch 7 10.6±0.7 96.0±2.2a 16.5±0.9 39.0 (41/105) Conventional 9.4±0.7 73.0±1.9b 16.8±0.9 45.0 (74/165) a,bDifferent superscripts denote differences between groups in the interval from P4 device removal to ovulation.



2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 176
Author(s):  
B. J. Duran ◽  
R. V. Sala ◽  
P. L. J. Monteiro ◽  
C. Gamarra ◽  
M. Fosado ◽  
...  

Previous research has shown that induction of an accessory corpus luteum (CL) by administration of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) on Day 5 increases circulating progesterone and reduces pregnancy loss between Days 33 and 60 in heifers receiving invitro-produced (IVP) embryos. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to determine whether timing of induction of an accessory CL influenced pregnancy loss in IVP recipients. Holstein heifers (n=1,658) were synchronized using a modified 5-day CIDR CO-Synch protocol. Briefly, heifers received an intravaginal progesterone device (CIDR) on Day −8, Day −3: CIDR removed and first prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) treatment, Day −2: second PGF2α, and Day 0: GnRH (G1, 100µg of gonadorelin acetate). Oestrus expression was evaluated on Day 0 with the use of an oestrus detection device. Transfer of fresh IVP embryos was performed on Day 7±1 after G1. At the time of transfer, heifers were randomly assigned, in a 2×2 factorial design, to receive GnRH (200µg of gonadorelin acetate) or remain as Control (untreated) at two different times: Day 7 (time of embryo transfer (ET)) or Day 21. Thus, the following groups were formed: Control-Control (n=410); Control-GnRH (n=409); GnRH-Control (n=419); and GnRH-GnRH (n=420). All heifers were evaluated by transrectal ultrasonography to determine number, size, and location of CL on Days 5, 14, 21, 28, 32, and 60 and pregnancy status on Days 28, 32, and 60. Data collected from each heifer included embryo stage and quality, oestrus expression, body condition score, number of transfers, and technician. Pregnancies per embryo transfer (P/ET) and pregnancy loss data were analysed by logistic regression (SAS 9.4). Ovulation to Day 7 treatment was greater (P&lt;0.01) in GnRH treated heifers (70.0%; 585 out of 836) than in untreated Controls (2.7%; 22 of 819). Ovulation to Day 21 treatment was determined only in animals pregnant at Day 28 and was greater (P&lt;0.01) in heifers treated with GnRH (37.6%; 153 of 407) than in untreated controls (1.0%; 4 of 390). There was no effect of Day 7 treatment (P&gt;0.68) or Day 21 treatment (P&gt;0.18), nor a Day 7×Day 21 treatment interaction (P&gt;0.48) on P/ET at Day 32 or 60 (Table 1). Treatment with GnRH on Day 7 or 21 did not alter pregnancy loss between Days 32 and 60 (P&gt;0.10). Heifers with an accessory CL present at Day 32 (11.7%; 41 of 350) had similar (P=0.55) pregnancy loss compared with heifers with no accessory CL (14.4%; 54 of 375). The number of CL present on Day 32 did not affect (P=0.23) pregnancy loss; however, heifers with 3 CL (4.9%; 3 of 61) tended (P&lt;0.10) to have reduced pregnancy loss compared with heifers with 1 CL (14.4%; 54 of 375) or 2 CL (13.2%; 38 of 289). In conclusion, treatment with GnRH on Day 7 or 21 induced an accessory CL; however, it did not affect P/ET on Days 32 or 60 and pregnancy loss. Table 1.Pregnancies per embryo transfer (P/ET) and pregnancy loss in embryo recipients based on timing of treatment with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) Treatment P/ET Day 32% (n) P/ET Day 60% (n) Pregnancy loss% (n) Day 7 Day 21 Control Control 42.4 (410) 36.1 (410) 15.0 (174) GnRH 46.0 (409) 40.7 (409) 11.7 (188) GnRH Control 43.7 (419) 36.8 (419) 15.9 (183) P-value GnRH 43.1 (420) 38.8 (420) 10.0 (181) Day 7 treatment 0.68 0.72 0.96 Day 21 treatment 0.51 0.18 0.11 Interaction 0.48 0.66 0.71



2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 224
Author(s):  
L. C. Peres ◽  
D. Pincinato ◽  
L. Cutaia ◽  
R. Tribulo ◽  
G. A. Bo

An experiment was designed to evaluate alternative treatment protocols for fixed-time embryo transfer (FTET) in recipients in order to reduce cattle handling. Non-lactating, cycling Bos taurus � Bos indicus beef cows (n = 918), with a body condition score (BCS) of 2.5 to 3.5 out of 5, received a progesterone-releasing device (DIB; Syntex, Buenos Aires, Argentina) and 2 mg estradiol benzoate (EB; Syntex) IM on random days of the cycle (Day 0); DIB were removed on Day 8. Cows were placed randomly into 6 treatment groups in a 3 � 2 factorial design. The factors evaluated were time of administration of PGF and eCG [control treatment: PGF Day 5 and eCG Day 5 (Bo et al. 2002 Theriogenology 57, 53–72); PGF Days 0 and 8 and eCG Day 5; PGF Days 0 and 8 and eCG Day 8] and the time of administration of the second injection of EB (at DIB removal or 24 h later). Therefore, cows in the control treatment received 150 �g of d-Cloprostenol (PGF, Ciclase; Syntex) and 400 IU eCG (Novormon; Syntex) on Day 5, whereas cows in the other 2 treatments received 75 �g of PGF on Days 0 and 8 and 400 IU eCG on either Day 5 or Day 8. Each treatment group was further subdivided to receive 1 mg EB IM on either Day 8 (EB Day 8) or Day 9 (EB Day 9). All recipients, whether observed in estrus or not and with more than one CL with luteal area (total CL area minus cavity area) &gt;76 mm2 on the day before embryo transfer, received frozen-thawed embryos (IETS Grade 1) on Day 16 (EB Day 8) or Day 17 (EB Day 9) by direct transfer. Pregnancy was determined by ultrasonography 30 days after FTET. Continuous data were analyzed by ANOVA and pregnancy rates were analyzed by logistic regression. No effects of body condition score or technician were detected (P &gt; 0.1). Although there were no differences in conception rates between recipients treated with EB on Day 8 or Day 9 (168/321, 52.3% vs. 203/350, 58.0%, respectively; P &gt; 0.1), treatment with EB on Day 8 resulted in fewer recipients selected/treated (321/460, 69.7% vs. 350/458, 76.4%; P &lt; 0.05) and pregnant/treated (168/460, 36.5% vs. 203/458, 44.3%; P &lt; 0.05) than 24 h later (EB Day 9), respectively. The mean interval from DIB removal to estrus was shorter (P &lt; 0.05) for recipients in the EB Day 8 (28.1 � 7.2 h) than in the EB Day 9 (43.5 � 9.4 h) group, and the mean (� SEM) CL area was also less in the EB Day 8 group than in the EB Day 9 group (261.7 � 96.7 vs. 293.1 � 114. mm2; P &lt; 0.05). The number of recipients selected/treated was higher in the group receiving PGF on Days 0 and 8 and eCG on Day 8 (243/305, 79.6%) than in the group receiving PGF on Days 0 and 8 and eCG on Day 5 (208/301, 69.1%) or the control group (220/312, 70.5%). Although the luteal area was greater (P &lt; 0.05) in the PGF on Days 0 and 8 and eCG on Day 5 group (304.4 � 127.1 mm2) than in the groups receiving PGF and eCG on Day 5 (274.6 � 98.6 mm2) or PGF on Days 0 and 8 and eCG Day 8 (258.4 � 90.2 mm2), pregnancy rates did not differ between PGF and eCG treatment groups (P &gt; 0.05). It was concluded that it may be possible to reduce animal handling by treating recipients with a half dose of PGF at the time of DIB insertion and removal, when eCG is also administered, without compromising pregnancy rates.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document