scholarly journals Analysis of Estrogen Response Element Binding by Genetically Selected Steroid Receptor DNA Binding Domain Mutants Exhibiting Altered Specificity and Enhanced Affinity

1999 ◽  
Vol 274 (33) ◽  
pp. 23591-23598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudsanguan Chusacultanachai ◽  
Kevin A. Glenn ◽  
Adrian O. Rodriguez ◽  
Erik K. Read ◽  
Jeffrey F. Gardner ◽  
...  
1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 2037-2042
Author(s):  
A M Nardulli ◽  
D J Shapiro

We have used circular permutation analysis to determine whether binding of purified Xenopus laevis estrogen receptor DNA-binding domain (DBD) to a DNA fragment containing an estrogen response element (ERE) causes the DNA to bend. Gel mobility shift assays showed that DBD-DNA complexes formed with fragments containing more centrally located EREs migrated more slowly than complexes formed with fragments containing EREs near the ends of the DNA. DNA bending standards were used to determine that the degree of bending induced by binding of the DBD to an ERE was approximately 34 degrees. A 1.55-fold increase in the degree of bending was observed when two EREs were present in the DNA fragment. These in vitro studies suggest that interaction of nuclear receptors with their hormone response elements in vivo may result in an altered DNA conformation.


1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 2037-2042 ◽  
Author(s):  
A M Nardulli ◽  
D J Shapiro

We have used circular permutation analysis to determine whether binding of purified Xenopus laevis estrogen receptor DNA-binding domain (DBD) to a DNA fragment containing an estrogen response element (ERE) causes the DNA to bend. Gel mobility shift assays showed that DBD-DNA complexes formed with fragments containing more centrally located EREs migrated more slowly than complexes formed with fragments containing EREs near the ends of the DNA. DNA bending standards were used to determine that the degree of bending induced by binding of the DBD to an ERE was approximately 34 degrees. A 1.55-fold increase in the degree of bending was observed when two EREs were present in the DNA fragment. These in vitro studies suggest that interaction of nuclear receptors with their hormone response elements in vivo may result in an altered DNA conformation.


1998 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 664-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorene E. Romine ◽  
Jennifer R. Wood ◽  
LuAnne A. Lamia ◽  
Paul Prendergast ◽  
Dean P. Edwards ◽  
...  

Abstract We have examined the ability of the high-mobility group protein 1 (HMG1) to alter binding of the estrogen receptor DNA-binding domain (DBD) to the estrogen response element (ERE). HMG1 dramatically enhanced binding of purified, bacterially expressed DBD to the consensus vitellogenin A2 ERE in a dose-dependent manner. The ability of HMG1 to stabilize the DBD-ERE complex resulted in part from a decrease in the dissociation rate of the DBD from the ERE. Antibody supershift experiments demonstrated that HMG1 was also capable of forming a ternary complex with the ERE-bound DBD in the presence of HMG1-specific antibody. HMG1 did not substantially affect DBD-ERE contacts as assessed by methylation interference assays, nor did it alter the ability of the DBD to induce distortion in ERE-containing DNA fragments. Because HMG1 dramatically enhanced estrogen receptor DBD binding to the ERE, and the DBD is the most highly conserved region among the nuclear receptor superfamily members, HMG1 may function to enhance binding of other nuclear receptors to their respective response elements and act in concert with coactivator proteins to regulate expression of hormone-responsive genes.


2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 899-911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia C. Hewitt ◽  
Leping Li ◽  
Sara A. Grimm ◽  
Wipawee Winuthayanon ◽  
Katherine J. Hamilton ◽  
...  

Abstract Estrogen receptor α (ERα) interacts with DNA directly or indirectly via other transcription factors, referred to as “tethering.” Evidence for tethering is based on in vitro studies and a widely used “KIKO” mouse model containing mutations that prevent direct estrogen response element DNA- binding. KIKO mice are infertile, due in part to the inability of estradiol (E2) to induce uterine epithelial proliferation. To elucidate the molecular events that prevent KIKO uterine growth, regulation of the pro-proliferative E2 target gene Klf4 and of Klf15, a progesterone (P4) target gene that opposes the pro-proliferative activity of KLF4, was evaluated. Klf4 induction was impaired in KIKO uteri; however, Klf15 was induced by E2 rather than by P4. Whole uterine chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing revealed enrichment of KIKO ERα binding to hormone response elements (HREs) motifs. KIKO binding to HRE motifs was verified using reporter gene and DNA-binding assays. Because the KIKO ERα has HRE DNA-binding activity, we evaluated the “EAAE” ERα, which has more severe DNA-binding domain mutations, and demonstrated a lack of estrogen response element or HRE reporter gene induction or DNA-binding. The EAAE mouse has an ERα null–like phenotype, with impaired uterine growth and transcriptional activity. Our findings demonstrate that the KIKO mouse model, which has been used by numerous investigators, cannot be used to establish biological functions for ERα tethering, because KIKO ERα effectively stimulates transcription using HRE motifs. The EAAE-ERα DNA-binding domain mutant mouse demonstrates that ERα DNA-binding is crucial for biological and transcriptional processes in reproductive tissues and that ERα tethering may not contribute to estrogen responsiveness in vivo.


Cell ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 685-695 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart Adler ◽  
Marian L. Waterman ◽  
Xi He ◽  
Michael G. Rosenfeld

1997 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1581-1592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roderick E. M. Scott ◽  
X. Sharon Wu-Peng ◽  
Paul M. Yen ◽  
William W. Chin ◽  
Donald W. Pfaff

Abstract The identification of hormone response elements in the promoter regions of hormonally regulated genes has revealed a striking similarity between the half-site of the estrogen-response element (ERE) and a consensus sequence constituting the thyroid hormone-response element. Because of the potential for thyroid hormone (T3) to affect estrogen (E)- and progesterone-dependent female reproductive behavior via EREs, we have begun to investigate the activity of an ERE identified in the progesterone receptor (PR) proximal promoter and its interactions with the estrogen receptor (ER) and thyroid hormone receptors (TR). In addition, we have compared ER and TR interactions on the PR ERE construct with that of the vitellogenin A2 (vit A2) consensus ERE. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays demonstrated that TR binds to the PR ERE as well as to the consensus ERE sequence in vitro. Further, these two EREs were differentially regulated by T3 in the presence of TR. T3 in the presence of TRα increased transcription from a PR ERE construct ∼5-fold and had no inhibitory effect on E induction. Similarly, T3 also activated a β-galactosidase reporter construct containing PR promoter sequences spanning −1400 to +700. In addition, the TR isoforms β1 and β2 also stimulated transcription from the PR ERE construct by 5- to 6-fold. A TRα mutant lacking the ability to bind AGGTCA sequences in vitro failed to activate transcription from the PR ERE construct, demonstrating dependence on DNA binding. In contrast to its actions on the PR ERE construct, TRα did not activate transcription from the vit A2 consensus ERE but rather attenuated E-mediated transcriptional activation. Attenuation from the vit A2 consensus ERE is not necessarily dependent on DNA binding as the TRα DNA binding mutant was still able to inhibit E-dependent transactivation. In contrast to TRα, the isoforms TRβ1 and TRβ2 failed to inhibit E-induced activation from the vit A2 consensus ERE. These results demonstrate that the PR ERE construct differs from the vit A2 consensus ERE in its ability to respond to TRs and that divergent pathways exist for activation and inhibition by TR. Since ERs, PRs, and TRs are all present in hypothalamic neurons, these findings may be significant for endocrine integration, which is important for reproductive behavior.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document