Progressive Patient Care: Patient Care Plan Moves Out of Experimental Stage as Manchester Memorial Hospital Adds $2.5 Million Wing

1960 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 19-25
Author(s):  
Ellen L. Davis
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Care Patient ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Memorial Hospital ◽  
Experimental Stage

scholarly journals Use of Headings and Classifications by Physicians in Medical Narratives of EHRs

2011 ◽  
Vol 02 (02) ◽  
pp. 143-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Harno ◽  
P. Nykänen ◽  
K. Häyrinen
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Care Patient ◽  
Narrative Text ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Medical Specialties ◽  
Secondary Use ◽  
Use Of Data ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Medical Narratives ◽  
Specialist Groups

Summary Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe and evaluate patient care documentation by hospital physicians in EHRs and especially the use of national headings and classifications in these documentations Material and Methods: The initial material consisted of a random sample of 3,481 medical narratives documented in EHRs during the period 2004-2005 in one department of a Finnish central hospital. The final material comprised a subset of 1,974 medical records with a focus on consultation requests and consultation responses by two specialist groups from 871 patients. This electronic documentation was analyzed using deductive content analyses and descriptive statistics. Results: The physicians documented patient care in EHRs principally as narrative text. The medical narratives recorded by specialists were structured with headings in less than half of the patient cases. Consultation responses in general were more often structured with headings than consultation requests. The use of classifications was otherwise insignificant, but diagnoses were documented as ICD 10 codes in over 50% of consultation responses by both medical specialties. Conclusion: There is an obvious need to improve the structuring of narrative text with national headings and classifications. According to the findings of this study, reason for care, patient history, health status, follow-up care plan and diagnosis are meaningful headings in physicians’ documentation. The existing list of headings needs to be analyzed within a consistent unified terminology system as a basis for further development. Adhering to headings and classifications in EHR documentation enables patient data to be shared and aggregated. The secondary use of data is expected to improve care management and quality of care.

Occupational Exposures in the Homecare Environment: Piloting an Observation Tool

2021 ◽  
pp. 108482232098691
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Bien ◽  
Kermit Davis ◽  
Susan Reutman ◽  
Gordon Gillespie
Keyword(s):  
Home Care ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Occupational Safety ◽  
Occupational Exposures ◽  
Care Patient ◽  
Home Healthcare ◽  
Occupational Hazards ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Direct Observations ◽  
Occupational Setting

The population of home healthcare workers (HHCWs) is rapidly expanding. Worker tasks and the unique home care environments place the worker at increased risks of occupational exposures, injury, and illness. Previous studies focusing on occupational exposures of HHCWs are limited to self-reports and would benefit from direct observations. The purpose of this study is to describe the occupational hazards observed in the unique work environment of home healthcare. HHCWs and home care patient participants were recruited from one home care agency in the Midwest to be observed during a routine home visit. This cross-sectional study used a trained occupational health nurse for direct observation of the occupational setting. Standardized observations and data collection were completed using the Home Healthcare Worker Observation Tool. The observer followed a registered nurse and occupational therapist into 9 patient homes observing visits ranging from 22 to 58 minutes. Hazards observed outside of and within the home include uneven pavements (n = 6, 67%), stairs without railings (n = 2, 22%), throw rugs (n = 7, 78%), unrestrained animals (n = 2, 22%), dust (n = 5, 56%), and mold (n = 2, 22%). Hand hygiene was observed prior to patient care 2 times (22%) and after patient care during 5 visits (56%). Observations have identified hazards that have the potential to impact workers’ and patients’ health. The direct observations of HHCWs provided opportunities for occupational safety professionals to understand the occupational exposures and challenges HHCWs encounter in the home care environment and begin to identify ways to mitigate occupational hazards.

scholarly journals Randomized controlled study of the impact of a participatory patient care plan among primary care patients with common chronic diseases: a one-year follow-up study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Tusa ◽  
Hannu Kautiainen ◽  
Pia Elfving ◽  
Sanna Sinikallio ◽  
Pekka Mäntyselkä
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Disease Specific

Abstract Backround Chronic diseases and multimorbidity are common in the ageing population and affect the health related quality of life. Health care resources are limited and the continuity of care has to be assured. Therefore it is essential to find demonstrable tools for best treatment practices for patients with chronic diseases. Our aim was to study the influence of a participatory patient care plan on the health-related quality of life and disease specific outcomes related to diabetes, ischemic heart disease and hypertension. Methods The data of the present study were based on the Participatory Patient Care Planning in Primary Care. A total of 605 patients were recruited in the Siilinjärvi Health Center in the years 2017–2018 from those patients who were followed up due to the treatment of hypertension, ischemic heart disease or diabetes. Patients were randomized into usual care and intervention groups. The intervention consisted of a participatory patient care plan, which was formulated in collaboration with the patient and the nurse and the physician during the first health care visit. Health-related quality of life with the 15D instrument and the disease-specific outcomes of body mass index (BMI), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1C) and blood pressure were assessed at the baseline and after a one-year follow-up. Results A total of 587 patients with a mean age of 69 years were followed for 12 months. In the intervention group there were 289 patients (54% women) and in the usual care group there were 298 patients (50% women). During the follow-up there were no significant changes between the groups in health-related quality and disease-specific outcomes. Conclusions During the 12-month follow-up, no significant differences between the intervention and the usual care groups were detected, as the intervention and the usual care groups were already in good therapeutic equilibrium at the baseline. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02992431. Registered 14/12/2016

scholarly journals Pediatric Endocrinology in the Time of COVID-19: Considerations for the Rapid Implementation of Telemedicine and Management of Pediatric Endocrine Conditions

2020 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. 343-350
Author(s):  
Molly O. Regelmann ◽  
Rushika Conroy ◽  
Evgenia Gourgari ◽  
Anshu Gupta ◽  
Ines Guttmann-Bauman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Care Patient ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Patient Privacy ◽  
Pediatric Endocrinology ◽  
Quality Of Patient Care ◽  
Care Outcomes ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
The Impact

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Pediatric endocrine practices had to rapidly transition to telemedicine care at the onset of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. For many, it was an abrupt introduction to providing virtual healthcare, with concerns related to quality of patient care, patient privacy, productivity, and compensation, as workflows had to change. <b><i>Summary:</i></b> The review summarizes the common adaptations for telemedicine during the pandemic with respect to the practice of pediatric endocrinology and discusses the benefits and potential barriers to telemedicine. <b><i>Key Messages:</i></b> With adjustments to practice, telemedicine has allowed providers to deliver care to their patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. The broader implementation of telemedicine in pediatric endocrinology practice has the potential for expanding patient access. Research assessing the impact of telemedicine on patient care outcomes in those with pediatric endocrinology conditions will be necessary to justify its continued use beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

Ostomy Patient Care Program

1972 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 374-379
Author(s):  
Margaret C. Gebhardt ◽  
Stephen M. Caiola ◽  
Fred M. Eckel
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Hospital Pharmacy ◽  
Local Community ◽  
Hospital Pharmacist ◽  
Care Program ◽  
Memorial Hospital ◽  
Continuing Care ◽  
Community Or ◽  
Patient Profile ◽  
Care Information

The ostomate is often a forgotten patient with regards to proper psychological and emotional preparation for his surgery and proper continuing care of his ostomy. The pharmacist can play an important role in aiding the ostomy patient, especially in providing him adequate appliances and ostomy-care information. The development and implementation of the ostomy program of the N. C. Memorial Hospital Pharmacy is presented in detail. A brief explanation of why ostomy surgery is necessary, of the various types of ostomies and of the various appliances utilized is also presented. The following services of the program are described: Use of a patient profile card in order to have on record the patient's specific appliance and replacement parts; Fitting the new ostomate with the proper appliance and instructing him on its proper use; Interviewing patient on return clinic visits to determine if the patient is having ostomy-related problems or needs any replacement parts for his appliance; Providing patient's appliance needs through the mail or through communication with the patient's local community or hospital pharmacist, and Conducting a presurgical consultation with the future ostomate to briefly explain appliances and how their use will affect his life, plus answer questions which may be making him apprehensive.

Nursing staff-led behavioural group intervention in psychiatric in-patient care: Patient and staff experiences

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 1401-1410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Salberg ◽  
Fredrik Folke ◽  
Lisa Ekselius ◽  
Caisa Öster
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Nursing Staff ◽  
Group Intervention ◽  
Care Patient ◽  
Staff Experiences

scholarly journals Organization Ethics in Healthcare

2000 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia H. Werhane ◽  
Mary V. Rorty
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Clinical Ethics ◽  
Professional Ethics ◽  
Applied Ethics ◽  
Care Patient ◽  
Professional Relationships ◽  
Healthcare Organizations ◽  
Clinical Patient ◽  
Organization Ethics ◽  
Professional Guidelines

Bioethics, clinical ethics, and professional ethics are mature, well-developed fields of applied ethics that focus on medical research, patient autonomy and patient care, patient–healthcare professional relationships, and issues that arise in clinical and other medical settings. However, despite these developments, little attention has been paid to the organizational aspects of healthcare in these fields. This is surprising, because in the last 30 years healthcare has become more and more institutionalized in provider, management, and insurer organizations. Despite JCAHO's preoccupation with organizational ethics during the last decade, the philosophical underpinnings of their requirements have been less explored in the literature. Clinical ethics remains preoccupied with clinical patient care and professional ethics with individual professional guidelines; even the American College of Healthcare Executives focuses primarily on healthcare managers, not on healthcare organizations.

Written care plan and patient enablement: Pre-implementation data from the 4R in Oncology Project.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18032-e18032
Author(s):  
Julia Rachel Trosman ◽  
Christine B. Weldon ◽  
Claudia B. Perez ◽  
Swati Kulkarni ◽  
Seema Ahsan Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Net ◽  
Care Patient ◽  
Academic Community ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Patient Enablement ◽  
Implementation Data ◽  
The Impact

e18032 Background: The IOM ’11 and ’13 reports recommend a written care plan (WCP) at cancer diagnosisto enable teamwork and patient (pt) engagement. Standardized multimodality WCP is a key part of the 4R model of care planning and pt engagement proposed under “NCI ASCO Teams” Project (Trosman JOP 2016). 4R (Right Information / Care / Patient / Time) is under implementation at 3 centers: academic, community and safety net. As current state assessment prior to implementing 4R and standard multimodality WCP, we surveyed pts not impacted by 4R on care planning, enablement and whether they received any WCP. Methods: Survey of breast cancer stage I-III pts who received care at the three sites Jan ’15 - Mar ’16, prior to 4R. We used simple frequencies and Fisher’s exact test in analysis. Results: Survey response rate: 47%, 241/515. Gaps of > 30% were reported in 7 of 8 aspects of care planning and pt enablement - Table. A non standard WCP was received by 46% of pts. Receiving a WCP impacted whether pts were clear about care (85% with WCP vs 52% without, p < .0001), able to manage own care (79% with WCP vs 58% without, p = .0005) and overwhelmed (35% with WCP vs 49% without, p = .04). Care complexity was a significant factor for feeling overwhelmed by pts without WCP (49% of pts receiving > 6 care services felt overwhelmed vs. 30% of pts receiving < = 6 services, p = .04), but not a significant factor in pts with WCP (45% vs 41%, p = .7). More pts with WCP reported well managed care by providers than pts without WCP (77%, 62%, P = .02). Conclusions: Serious gaps found in care planning and pt enablement at our sites support the need for 4R implementation. Even pre-4R, non standard WCPs improve pt understanding of care and ability to manage it, and reduce the impact of care complexity on pts. Providers using WCP appear to also coordinate care, but WCP itself may be an important factor of patient enablement. [Table: see text]

Written care plan and patient enablement: Pre-implementation data from the 4R in Oncology Project.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 55-55
Author(s):  
Julia Rachel Trosman ◽  
Christine B. Weldon ◽  
Claudia B. Perez ◽  
Swati Kulkarni ◽  
Seema Ahsan Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Net ◽  
Care Patient ◽  
Academic Community ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Patient Enablement ◽  
Implementation Data ◽  
The Impact

55 Background: The IOM ’11 and ’13 reports recommend a written care plan (WCP) at cancer diagnosisto enable teamwork and patient (pt) engagement. Standardized multimodality WCP is a key part of the 4R model of care planning and pt engagement proposed under “NCI ASCO Teams” Project (Trosman JOP 2016). 4R (Right Information / Care / Patient / Time) is under implementation at three centers: academic, community and safety net. As current state assessment prior to implementing 4R and standard multimodality WCP, we surveyed pts not impacted by 4R on care planning, enablement and whether they received any WCP. Methods: Survey of breast cancer stage I-III pts who received care at the three sites Jan ’15 - Mar ’16, prior to 4R. We used simple frequencies and Fisher’s exact test in analysis. Results: Survey response rate: 48%, 197/410. Gaps of > 30% were reported in 6 of 8 aspects of care planning and pt enablement - Table. A non standard WCP was received by 45% of pts. Receiving a WCP impacted whether pts were clear about care (90% with WCP vs 50% without, p < .0001), able to manage own care (81% with WCP vs 59% without, p = .001) and overwhelmed (49% with WCP vs 68% without, p = .006). Care complexity was a significant factor for feeling overwhelmed by pts without WCP (60% of pts receiving > 6 care services felt overwhelmed vs. 39% of pts receiving < = 6 services, p = .04), but not a significant factor in pts with WCP (38% vs 44%, p = .7). More pts with WCP reported well managed care by providers than pts without WCP (78%, 64%, P = .04). Conclusions: Serious gaps found in care planning and pt enablement at our sites support the need for 4R implementation. Even pre-4R, non standard WCPs improve pt understanding of care and ability to manage it, and reduce the impact of care complexity on pts. Providers using WCP appear to also coordinate care, but WCP itself may be an important factor of patient enablement. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document