The Effects of Group Membership on College Students’ Social Exclusion of Peers and Bystander Behavior

2019 ◽  
Vol 154 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-37
Author(s):  
Hope Forbes ◽  
Abigail M. Stark ◽  
Sarah W. Hopkins ◽  
Gary D. Fireman
2018 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 862-867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara G. Balestrieri ◽  
Graham T. DiGuiseppi ◽  
Matthew K. Meisel ◽  
Melissa A. Clark ◽  
Miles Q. Ott ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Haocheng Luo ◽  
Jiarong Chen ◽  
Shengnan Li ◽  
Yangang Nie ◽  
Guodong Wang

With the development of science and technology, buying has become much easier. At the same time, however, impulsive buying has many negative consequences for college students, and the causes of impulsive buying should therefore be explored. To explore the relationship between social exclusion and impulsive buying and its underlying mechanism, this study used the Social Exclusion Scale, Self-Esteem Scale, Risk Preference Scale, and Impulsive Buying Scale to investigate the roles of self-esteem and risk preference in the relationship between social exclusion and impulsive buying among 768 college students (387 were female, Mage = 20.25 years). The results were as follows: (1) when controlling for gender, age, family monthly income, and monthly living expenses, social exclusion significantly and positively predicted impulsive buying; (2) self-esteem played a mediating role between social exclusion and impulsive buying; (3) risk preference moderated the relationship between the second half of the mediating path and the direct path. These results reveal the mechanism underlying impulsive buying in college students, that is, social exclusion will predict the decrease of college students' self-esteem, and low self-esteem will further predict college students' impulsive buying which is a way for them to gain a sense of self-worth. Relatively low risk preference can well alleviate the negative impact of social exclusion and low self-esteem on impulsive buying. What’s more, these results have implications for impulsive buying interventions. Schools should aim to create a good peer atmosphere by making certain rules that help to reduce social exclusion and parents and education departments should cultivate students’ risk awareness to avoid risk behaviors in college students, such as impulsive buying behavior.


2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lasse Suonperä Liebst ◽  
Marie Bruvik Heinskou ◽  
Peter Ejbye-Ernst

Objectives: Bystander studies have rarely considered the victimization risk associated with intervention into violent, dangerous emergencies. To address this gap, we aim to identify factors that influence bystanders’ risk of being physically victimized. Method: We observed bystander behavior from video surveillance footage of naturally occurring violence in nighttime economy settings, and data were analyzed with a logistic regression model. Results: Data show that approximately one of the six interventions results in some type of victimization, typically with a relatively low degree of severity. The bystander’s social group membership, the setting of the emergency, and the bystander’s intervention type are estimated as risk factors for victimization. Conclusions: Previous research suggests that a bystander’s social group membership with victims promotes intervention behavior. Our results expand the role of social group membership as being a factor that also influences whether the intervening bystander is victimized.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 676-687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brenda C. Straka ◽  
Sarah E. Gaither ◽  
Shawn K. Acheson ◽  
H. S. Swartzwelder

Social exclusion is associated with substance use, but the specific link between majority and minority racial group membership and substance use is unknown. We examined how social exclusion among racial majority (White), Multiracial, and racial minority (Native American, Latino, Asian, and Black) college students relates to self-reported alcohol use and motivations. Using the AlcoholEdu for College™ survey, Study 1a reports five factors related to motives for initiating or inhibiting alcohol use. Study 1b analyzes majority, Multiracial, and minority college students’ comparative endorsement of these motivations. Study 2 compares these factors with established belonging scales using a separate undergraduate sample. White, Multiracial, Native American, and Latino students displayed the highest proportion of problematic alcohol use. White students endorsed belonging-based drinking motivations, while Multiracial and Asian students endorsed motivations similar to both majority and minority groups. Native American, Latino, and Black students endorsed abstaining motivations more than other groups.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 397-409
Author(s):  
Laura B. Santacrose ◽  
Anne C. Laurita ◽  
Timothy C. Marchell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document