Does visiting a community garden enhance social relations? Evidence from an East European city

Author(s):  
Petra Hencelová ◽  
František Križan ◽  
Kristína Bilková ◽  
Michala Sládeková Madajová
Author(s):  
Nanna Jordt Jørgensen

Ten years after democratization, the township areas surrounding South African cities are still dominated by poverty and unemployment. For most township inhabitants, wage employment is not an option, and they engage in numerous activities to provide their families with the daily bread. One of these activities is the cultivation of vegetables in community gardens. In Port Elizabeth, community garden projects have received support from a number of development institutions working in the townships. Development institutions and township inhabitants alike regard cultivation as not just a matter of putting food on the table, but also an activity with significant moral connotations. To the township inhabitants, the moral person is a person who continuously participates in social networks through everyday exchanges with family and neighbours, and ritual exchanges with their forefathers. Cultivation of the soil provides cultivators with crops for those exchanges and creates a feeling of being close to the forefathers. Furthermore, cultivators underline that morality becomes embodied through hard work, which teaches people good social behaviour. Development institutions, on the other hand, see the moral person as an autonomous individual who works hard to sustain his family and develop and thus proves himself as a good citizen. While development institutions expect cultivators to concentrate their efforts on making the gardens productive and sustainable projects, the cultivators use cultivation as an investment in social relations and focus on the sustainability of their life as such. In this way, cultivators’ practice is also a way of reworking and reinterpreting the meaning of a development intervention to fit a local moral world.  


2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 1054-1077
Author(s):  
JAN BURZLAFF

AbstractThis historiographical review focuses on the complex interactions between Nazi Germany, local populations, and east European Jews during the Holocaust. Braving fierce historical revisionism in eastern Europe and the Baltic states, recent studies have shifted the spotlight from Germans to Poles, Ukrainians, Russians, Lithuanians, and other ethnicities. As a result, the analytic categories with which most historians still work – notably ‘perpetrator/victim/bystander’ and ‘collaboration/resistance’ – have outlived their usefulness. A more complex picture of the Nazi-occupied territories in eastern Europe has emerged and now awaits new theoretical frameworks. This article argues that past paradigms blinded scholars to a range of groups lost in the cracks and to behaviours remaining outside the political sphere. Through four criteria that shed light on the social history of the Holocaust in eastern Europe, it draws connections between central and east European, German, Jewish, and Soviet histories, in order to engage with other fields and disciplines that examine modern mass violence and genocide. As Holocaust studies stands at a crossroads, only a transnational history including all ethnicities and deeper continuities, both temporal and geographical, will enhance our knowledge of how social relations shaped the very evolution of the Holocaust.


Author(s):  
Marcin Wodziński

This chapter discusses the study of the Haskalah and the hasidic movement in the Kingdom of Poland, sometimes also known as “Congress Poland” because it was created by the Congress of Vienna in the nineteenth century. Hasidism was no doubt the largest and most important new movement to emerge within east European Jewry in those turbulent times. The chapter explains how Hasidism participated in abrupt social, economic, and cultural transformations in the Polish territories. It investigates the changes in social relations and perceptions that the transformations brought about or how the new social formations that arose in the Polish lands defined and redefined themselves in relation to each other. The chapter focuses on Haskalah and the traditional non-hasidic Jewish community by considering the political history of the Kingdom of Poland and its relationship with the hasidic movement.


2020 ◽  
pp. 0308518X2097787
Author(s):  
Fatmir Haskaj

Community gardens are fertile fields of complex political, economic and social relations, on both a local and global level. From environmentalism to urban policy and planning, racial and gender studies, transnational migration, commodity chains and food studies, the garden in the city offers an abundance of research opportunities and analytical resources. This article seeks to contribute to the efforts to understand and contest hegemonic forces in the urban environment, forces that are rooted in what Foucault identified as a set of sacred binaries which underpin a host of power relations that are “given” and form the unquestioned framework of a given set of power relations. This is therefore a project which is bent on a “theoretical desanctification of space” by a disordering of one set of several sanctified oppositions which can be found in the space of the community garden. The article de-sanctifies space by exploring the historical context of the community garden in New York and Oakland California and posits that the work of the gardener is co-opted into a value regime by a process I call “conspicuous labor”. This process is similar to Veblen's conspicuous consumption except the value generated is not in modeling consumption but rather in emulating class patterns and re-configuring the urban poor as a productive, passive and pastoral.


2019 ◽  
pp. 1-23
Author(s):  
Lindsay K. Campbell ◽  
Erika S. Svendsen ◽  
Renae Reynolds ◽  
Victoria Marshall

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document