Choosing the best pairwise comparisons of means from non-normal populations, with unequal variances, but equal sample sizes

2010 ◽  
Vol 80 (6) ◽  
pp. 595-608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip H. Ramsey ◽  
Patricia P. Ramsey ◽  
Kyrstle Barrera
2011 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip H. Ramsey ◽  
Kyrstle Barrera ◽  
Pri Hachimine-Semprebom ◽  
Chang-Chia Liu

1980 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 337-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip H. Ramsey

It is noted that disagreements have arisen in the literature about the robustness of the t test in normal populations with unequal variances. Hsu's procedure is applied to determine exact Type I error rates for t. Employing fairly liberal but objective standards for assessing robustness, it is shown that the t test is not always robust to the assumption of equal population variances even when sample sizes are equal. Several guidelines are suggested including the point that to apply t at α = .05 without regard for unequal variances would require equal sample sizes of at least 15 by one of the standards considered. In many cases, especially those with unequal N's, an alternative such as Welch's procedure is recommended.


1998 ◽  
Vol 48 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 73-82
Author(s):  
Moloy De ◽  
Jyotirmoy Sarkar

We exhibit the superiority of the Graybill- Deal estimator for estimating the common mean of two univariate normal populations with unequal variances, under a two stage sampling scheme. Some properties of the two-stage Graybill-Deal estimator are discussed.


1995 ◽  
Vol 45 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 103-110
Author(s):  
Moloy De

The purpose of this article is to extend a result of Sinha and Mouqadem ( Commun. Stal. Theo. Meth. 11, 1982, 1603-1614), and present a class of admissible estimators of the common mean of two univariate normal populations with unknown unequal variances. An extension of tbis result in the case of two-stage procedures is also briefly discussed.


1987 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 1207-1218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Speckman ◽  
Sharon Anderson ◽  
John Hewett

1994 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Algina ◽  
T. C. Oshima ◽  
Wen-Ying Lin

Type I error rates were estimated for three tests that compare means by using data from two independent samples: the independent samples t test, Welch’s approximate degrees of freedom test, and James’s second-order test. Type I error rates were estimated for skewed distributions, equal and unequal variances, equal and unequal sample sizes, and a range of total sample sizes. Welch’s test and James’s test have very similar Type I error rates and tend to control the Type I error rate as well or better than the independent samples t test does. The results provide guidance about the total sample sizes required for controlling Type I error rates.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document