Interference in Learning Context‐dependent Words

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert T. Elliott ◽  
Qingzong Zhang
Author(s):  
Ke Yan ◽  
Jie Chen ◽  
Wenhao Zhu ◽  
Xin Jin ◽  
Guannan Hu

2018 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. 48-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henghui Zhu ◽  
Ioannis Ch. Paschalidis ◽  
Michael E. Hasselmo

Author(s):  
Yeon Soon Shin ◽  
Rolando Masís-Obando ◽  
Neggin Keshavarzian ◽  
Riya Dáve ◽  
Kenneth A. Norman

AbstractThe context-dependent memory effect, in which memory for an item is better when the retrieval context matches the original learning context, has proved to be difficult to reproduce in a laboratory setting. In an effort to identify a set of features that generate a robust context-dependent memory effect, we developed a paradigm in virtual reality using two semantically distinct virtual contexts: underwater and Mars environments, each with a separate body of knowledge (schema) associated with it. We show that items are better recalled when retrieved in the same context as the study context; we also show that the size of the effect is larger for items deemed context-relevant at encoding, suggesting that context-dependent memory effects may depend on items being integrated into an active schema.


Author(s):  
Milad S. Malekzadeh ◽  
Danilo Bruno ◽  
Sylvain Calinon ◽  
Thrishantha Nanayakkara ◽  
Darwin G. Caldwell

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-26
Author(s):  
Keita Higuchi ◽  
Hiroki Tsuchida ◽  
Eshed Ohn-Bar ◽  
Yoichi Sato ◽  
Kris Kitani

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin Lines ◽  
Kelsey Nation ◽  
Jean-Marc Fellous

The context in which learning occurs is sufficient to reconsolidate stored memories and neuronal reactivation may be crucial to memory consolidation during sleep. The mechanisms of context-dependent and sleep-dependent memory (re)consolidation are unknown but involve the hippocampus. We simulated memory (re)consolidation using a connectionist model of the hippocampus that explicitly accounted for its dorsoventral organization and for CA1 proximodistal processing. Replicating human and rodent (re)consolidation studies yielded the following results. (1) Semantic overlap between memory items and extraneous learning was necessary to explain experimental data and depended crucially on the recurrent networks of dorsal but not ventral CA3. (2) Stimulus-free, sleep-induced internal reactivations of memory patterns produced heterogeneous recruitment of memory items and protected memories from subsequent interference. These simulations further suggested that the decrease in memory resilience when subjects were not allowed to sleep following learning was primarily due to extraneous learning. (3) Partial exposure to the learning context during simulated sleep (i.e., targeted memory reactivation) uniformly increased memory item reactivation and enhanced subsequent recall. Altogether, these results show that the dorsoventral and proximodistal organization of the hippocampus may be important components of the neural mechanisms for context-based and sleep-based memory (re)consolidations.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeon Soon Shin ◽  
Rolando Masís-Obando ◽  
Neggin Keshavarzian ◽  
Riya Davé ◽  
Kenneth Norman

The context-dependent memory effect, in which memory for an item is better when the retrieval context matches the original learning context, has proved to be difficult to reproduce in a laboratory setting. In an effort to identify a set of features that generate a robust context-dependent memory effect, we developed a paradigm in virtual reality using two semantically distinct virtual contexts: underwater and Mars environments, each with a separate body of knowledge (schema) associated with it. We show that items are better recalled when retrieved in the same context as the study context; we also show that the size of the effect is larger for items deemed context-relevant at encoding, highlighting the importance of integrating items into an active schema in generating this effect.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document