Meta-Analysis of Black Tea Consumption and Breast Cancer Risk: Update 2013

2014 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 1009-1014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Cui Nie ◽  
Dao-Song Dong ◽  
Yang Bai ◽  
Pu Xia
2009 ◽  
Vol 119 (2) ◽  
pp. 477-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adeyemi A. Ogunleye ◽  
Fei Xue ◽  
Karin B. Michels

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 656-667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanli Wang ◽  
Yanyan Zhao ◽  
Feifei Chong ◽  
Mengmeng Song ◽  
Qiuyu Sun ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 1855-1864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mona Najaf Najafi ◽  
Maryam Salehi ◽  
Masumeh Ghazanfarpour ◽  
Zeinab Sadat Hoseini ◽  
Majid Khadem-Rezaiyan

2005 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 1310-1315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Can-Lan Sun ◽  
Jian-Min Yuan ◽  
Woon-Puay Koh ◽  
Mimi C. Yu

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 1253-1255
Author(s):  
Zeev Blumenfeld ◽  
Norbert Gleicher ◽  
Eli Y Adashi

Abstract Whereas longstanding dogma has purported that pregnancies protect women from breast cancer, a recent meta-analysis now mandates reconsideration since it reported an actual higher breast cancer risk for more than two decades after childbirth before the relative risk turns negative. Moreover, the risk of breast cancer appears higher for women having their first birth at an older age and with a family history and it is not reduced by breastfeeding. The process of obtaining informed consent for all fertility treatments, therefore, must make patients aware of the facts that every pregnancy, to a small degree, will increase the short-term breast cancer risk. This observation may be even more relevant in cases of surrogacy where women agree to conceive without deriving benefits of offspring from assuming the risk, thus creating a substantially different risk-benefit ratio. Consequently, it appears prudent for professional societies in the field to update recommendations regarding consent information for all fertility treatments but especially for treatments involving surrogacy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document