Native and non-native listeners’ judgements on the overall speech quality of hearing-impaired children

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (12) ◽  
pp. 1149-1168
Author(s):  
Nathalie Boonen ◽  
Hanne Kloots ◽  
Steven Gillis
Author(s):  
Nathalie Boonen ◽  
Hanne Kloots ◽  
Steven Gillis

Abstract Studies on the speech and language development of hearing-impaired children often focus on (deviations in) the children’s speech production. However, it is unclear if listeners also perceive differences between the speech of normally hearing and hearing-impaired children. This contribution wants to fill this void by investigating the overall perceived speech quality of both groups. Three groups of listeners (speech and language pathologists, primary school teachers and inexperienced listeners) judged 126 utterances of seven normally hearing children, seven children with an acoustic hearing aid and seven children with a cochlear implant, in a comparative judgment task. All children were approximately seven years old and received, in the case of the hearing-impaired children, their assistive hearing device before the age of two. The online tool D-PAC was used to administer the comparative judgement task. The listeners compared stimuli in pairs and decided which stimulus sounded best. This method ultimately leads to a ranking in which all stimuli are represented according to their overall perceived speech quality. The main result is that the speech of normally hearing children was preferred by the listeners. This indicates that, even after several years of device use, the speech quality of hearing-impaired children is perceived as different from that of normally hearing children. Within the group of hearing-impaired children, cochlear implanted children were judged to exhibit higher speech quality than acoustically hearing aided children, especially after a longer device use. The speech quality of the latter group, on the other hand, remained practically stable. Listeners, irrespectively of their degree of experience with (hearing-impaired) children’s speech, completed the task similarly. In other words: the difference between the overall perceived speech quality of normally hearing and hearing-impaired children is salient for all listener groups and they all slightly preferred children with a cochlear implant over children with an acoustic hearing aid.


2007 ◽  
Vol 137 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P266-P267
Author(s):  
Riina Niemensivu ◽  
Lauri Viitanen ◽  
Risto Roine ◽  
Erna Kentala

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (07) ◽  
pp. 1406-1418
Author(s):  
Shreya Chaudhary ◽  

The birth of differently-abled child brings huge impact on the life of parents. This condition results in adverse impact on quality of life of parents. The study examined the components of quality of life and coping strategies of mothers of children with visual impairment, hearing impairment, locomotor disability, and intellectual disability. This was a cross-sectional, ex-post facto research study. The statistical population included the mothers of differently abled children. 200 mothers of differently-abled children participated in the study. WHOQOL-BREF and Coping strategies scale was used for data collection. Findings revealed that the quality of life has statistically significant difference among the mothers of visually impaired, hearing-impaired children and mothers of locomotor disabled and intellectually disabled children. The mothers of visually impaired and hearing-impaired children use approach coping more than the mothers of intellectually disabled and locomotor disabled children. The avoidance coping is used more by mothers of locomotor disabled children followed by mothers of intellectually disabled children. Efficient social skill training programs should be provided to enhance their social network and quality of life. The professionals should also assess the needs, potential problems of mothers and integrate effective strategies with the treatment of their children.


2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 313-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thorsten Burger ◽  
Claudia Spahn ◽  
Bernhard Richter ◽  
Susanne Eissele ◽  
Erwin L??hle ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document