Personality disorders in an Irish mental health service: the Waterford Mental Health Survey

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 3-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Carr ◽  
Mairi Keenleyside ◽  
Mark Fitzhenry ◽  
Elizabeth Harte ◽  
Megan Daly White ◽  
...  
2003 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 613-619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tze Pin Ng ◽  
Tze Pin Ng ◽  
Calvin Soon Leng Fones ◽  
Ee Heok Kua

Objective: To ascertain the extent of the community's preference, needs for and utilization of mental health services, and their socio-demographic determinants in the multi-ethnic Asian community in Singapore. The extent to which need, enabling and predisposing factors determine the likelihood to seek professional help was also examined. Method: Data were analyzed from the Singapore National Mental Health Survey of 1996, based on a stratified random sample of 2947 Chinese, Malay and Indian subjects of the general population aged 13–64 years. Results: An estimated 37% of the general population indicated they would seek professional help if they experienced a serious emotional or mental problem. Although 16.9% were determined by their high general health questionnaire (GHQ) score to need mental health services, only 2.6% in the population used the services of any professional caregiver. Among persons with high GHQ scores, only 5.9% sought any professional help. Among those with a high GHQ score and who were receptive to professional help, only 10.4% actually sought professional help. General practitioners were the most commonly preferred caregiver (49.3%), and were used by 41.1% of those who sought help. Those who sought professional help were more likely to have a high GHQ score and to be inclined to seek professional help. Malays used mental health services more than Chinese, but they did not show a significantly greater prevalence of high GHQ scores, or a greater preference to seek professional help. Receptivity to professional help, high GHQ score, and Malay ethnicity were independent significant predictors of use of mental health service. Conclusion: Need and attitudinal factors predict mental health service utilization, but they still do not explain why a large majority of the population chose not to use mental health services.


2005 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terry J. Lewin ◽  
Tim Slade ◽  
Gavin Andrews ◽  
Vaughan J. Carr ◽  
Charles W. Hornabrook

2006 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 875-881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate M. Scott ◽  
Magnus A. McGee ◽  
Mark A. Oakley Browne ◽  
J. Elisabeth Wells

Objective: To show the extent and patterning of 12 month mental disorder comorbidity in the New Zealand population, and its association with case severity, suicidality and health service utilization. Method: A nationwide face-to-face household survey was carried out in October 2003 to December 2004 with 12 992 participants aged 16 years and over, achieving a response rate of 73.3%. The measurement of mental disorder was with the World Mental Health Survey Initiative version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 3.0). Comorbidity was analysed with hierarchy, consistent with a clinical approach to disorder count. Results: Comorbidity occurred among 37% of 12 month cases. Anxiety and mood disorders were most frequently comorbid. Strong bivariate associations occurred between alcohol and drug use disorders and, to a lesser extent, between substance use disorders and some anxiety and mood disorders. Comorbidity was associated with case severity, with suicidal behaviour (especially suicide attempts) and with health sector use (especially mental health service use). Conclusion: The widespread nature of mental disorder comorbidity has implications for the configuration of mental health services and for clinical practice.


1992 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Ciarlo ◽  
David L. Shern ◽  
Dan L. Tweed ◽  
Lee A. Kirkpatrick ◽  
Natalie Sachs-Ericsson

Author(s):  
Eleanor Nuzum ◽  
Evangelia Martin ◽  
Matthew Broadbent ◽  
Robert Stewart

The lockdown and social distancing policy imposed due to the COVID-19 pandemic is likely to have a widespread impact on mental healthcare for both services themselves and the people accessing those services. Previous reports from the South London and Maudsley NHS Trust (SLaM; a large mental health service provider for 1.2m residents in South London) highlighted a shift to virtual contacts among those accessing community mental health and home treatment teams and an increase in deaths over the pandemic first wave. However, there is a need to understand this further for specific groups, including those diagnosed with a personality disorder who might have particular vulnerabilities. Taking advantage of the Clinical Record Interactive Search (CRIS) data resource with 24-hourly updates of electronic mental health records data, this paper describes daily caseloads and contact numbers (face-to-face and virtual) for individuals with personality disorders across community, specialist, crisis and inpatient services. The report focussed on the period 1st January to 31st May 2020. We also report on daily accepted and discharged trust referrals, total trust caseloads and daily inpatient admissions and discharges for individuals with personality disorders. In addition, daily deaths are described for all current and previous SLaM service users with personality disorder over this period. In summary, comparing periods before and after 16th March 2020 there was a shift from face-to-face contacts to virtual contacts across all teams. Liaison and Older Adult teams showed the largest drop in caseloads, whereas Early Intervention in Psychosis service caseloads remained the same. Reduced accepted referrals and inpatient admissions were observed and there was a 28% increase in average daily deaths in the period after 16th March, compared to the period 1st January to 15th March.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina B. Gee ◽  
Gagan S. Khera ◽  
Alyssa T. Poblete ◽  
Barunie Kim ◽  
Syeda Y. Buchwach

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document