A review of “The Global Learning Organization” M. Marquardt & A. Reynolds, 1993 New York, Irwin ISBN 1 55623 83 98

1994 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 377-378
1995 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 217-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Marquardt

Two of the most critical issues facing business today are globalization and learning. Becoming a global learning organization is now essential for success in the marketplace. Based on research and experience with 50 organizations identified as learning organizations, the author noted 19 attributes or dimensions which were common to most of these organizations, namely: individual learning; group learning; streamlined structure; corporate learning culture; empowerment; environmental scanning; knowledge creation and transfer; learning technology; quality; learning strategy; supportive atmosphere; teamwork and networking; vision; acculturization; borders; globalization; language; leadership; and workforce diversity. Professor Marquardt concludes with 14 steps or actions which a company might consider in building itself into a global learning organization.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica M. Harris ◽  
Minjung Seo ◽  
Joshua S. McKeown

AbstractThere is a need for college students to develop global perspectives and gain cultural awareness to become responsible global citizens. Innovative ways to create such experiences are known as Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL experiences). COIL is a voluntary partnership between professors in different countries collaborating on jointly-constructed learning experiences to enhance international and intercultural understanding. The purpose of this article is to highlight a successful COIL partnership between students from SUNY Oswego in New York and The Hague University of Applied Sciences in the Netherlands during the COVID-19 pandemic. 35 students participated in the experience that served as a platform to educate students through a health educator’s unique cultural lens. Benefits from the experiences regarding global outcomes showed that both US students (n=70.6%) and Holland students (n=61.1%) felt that they gained the appropriate skills and knowledge to use in their future careers. 70.6% of US and 61.2% of Holland students reported that the COIL experience introduced them to a new outlook and new ways of thinking about how they relate to the world. The current COVID-19 pandemic has created an opportunity to rethink education pathways and integrate global learning in our classrooms.Keywords: Global learning; COIL; Partnerships, Collaboration  


2002 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 463-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy S Tolbert ◽  
Gary N McLean ◽  
Ray C Myers

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-40
Author(s):  
Iskandar Agung

Regulations require teachers to meet the teaching burden of at minimum 24 hours / week and maximum 40 hours /week. However, in fact, for minimal hour's teaching, still many teachers who have not been able to fulfill it. The fulfillment of minimum obligations is a requirement for teachers to obtain Professional Teacher Allowances (TPG). Various ways have been attempted by interested parties, but the issue of teacher teaching hours is still problems. The fulfillment effort merely in terms of quantity, has not led to quality. For what teachers are forced to fulfill the obligation of teaching hours, e.g. by looking at other schools, being in the duties of the main school still indicates the achievement of the students' inadequate learning outcomes? Naturally if the fulfillment of obligations is not only in terms of quantity, but also quality. This means that the need to find an alternative fulfillment of teaching hours is functioning as a driver to improve the quality of teachers, so that a positive impact on improving student learning outcomes. With regard to the latter description that this paper is presented, that is to say, alternative thinking about the provisions of teaching hours teachers.   References Agung, I. (2013). Penerapan sistem neuro associative conditioning (NAC) pada guru sebagai upaya meningkatkan mutu pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 19(2), 297-304. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.24832%2Fjpnk.v19i2.287 Agung, I. (2014). Kajian pengaruh kompetensi kepribadian dan sosial terhadap kinerja guru. Jurnal Ilmiah VISI, 9(2), 83-92. doi: https://doi.org/10.21009/JIV.0902.1 Agung, I. (2014). Panduan penelitian tindakan kelas bagi guru. Jakarta: Zikrul Bestari. Agung, I. (2017). Guru yang kompeten dan profesional: Orasi ilmiah profesor riset. Jakarta: Balitbang-Kemendikbud. Agung, I. (2018). Pengembangan keprofesian berkelanjutan (PKB) guru. Jakarta: Bee Media (akan beredar). Barge. S. (2010). Principles of problem and project based learning: The aalborg PBL model. USA: Aalborg University. Dalt, R. L. (2010). New era of management (era baru manajemen). Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat. De Graaf, E., & Kolmos, A. (2003). Characteristics of problem-based learning. The International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(5), 657 - 662. Ditjen GTK. (2015). Hasil UKG guru tahun 2015. Jakarta: Kemendikbud. Ditjen GTK. (2016). Program guru pembelajar. Jakarta: Kemendikbud. Ditjen GTK. (2017). Data hasil pre-test dan post-test pelatihan guru pembelajar. Jakarta: Kemendikbud. Ditjen Anggaran Kementerian Keuangan. (2015). Kajian tunjangan profesi guru. Kanalinfo.web.id. Diakses melalui https://www.kanalinfo.web.id/2016/03/tunjangan-profesi-guru.html) Fiol, C. M. & Marjorie, A.L. (1985). Organizational learning. The Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 803-813. http://www.jstor.org/stable/258048 Hmelo-Silver, C.E. (2004). Problem based learning: What and how do student learn. Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3 Lambros, A. (2004). Problem-based learning in middle and high school classrooms. CA: Corwin Press. Leithwood, K., Leonard L., & Sharratt, L. (1998). Conditions fostering organizational learning in schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(2), 243-276. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0013161X98034002005 Mangkunegara, A.A.A. P. (2010). Evaluasi kinerja SDM. Jakarta: Salemba Empat. Marquardt, M.J. (1996). Building the learning organization. New York: McGraw-Hill. Pedler, M. (1998). A concise guide to the learning organization. London: Publisher Lemos & Crane. Puslitjak. (2013). Hasil penelitian jam mengajar guru. Jakarta: Balitbang-Kemendikbud. Robins, S.P., & Judge, T.A. (1997). Organization behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill. Rhem, J. (1998). Problem-based learning: An introduction. The National Teaching Learning Forum, 8(1), 1-7. Senge, P.M. (1990). The fifth discipline the art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday. Simatupang, B.M. (1995). ISO Seri 14000 dalam fokus organisasi belajar, manajemen & usahawanIndonesia. Organisasi Belajar (Learning Organization), 11(XXIV). Watkin, K. E.& Marsic, V.J. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons in the art and science of systemic change. San Fransisco: Institue of Science Education.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Graupp ◽  
Gitte Jakobsen ◽  
John Vellema

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document