scholarly journals Parametric bootstrap mean squared error of a small area multivariate EBLUP

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 1474-1486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo Moretti ◽  
Natalie Shlomo ◽  
Joseph W. Sakshaug
2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 955-979
Author(s):  
Stefano Marchetti ◽  
Nikos Tzavidis

Abstract Small area estimation is receiving considerable attention due to the high demand for small area statistics. Small area estimators of means and totals have been widely studied in the literature. Moreover, in the last years also small area estimators of quantiles and poverty indicators have been studied. In contrast, small area estimators of inequality indicators, which are often used in socio-economic studies, have received less attention. In this article, we propose a robust method based on the M-quantile regression model for small area estimation of the Theil index and the Gini coefficient, two popular inequality measures. To estimate the mean squared error a non-parametric bootstrap is adopted. A robust approach is used because often inequality is measured using income or consumption data, which are often non-normal and affected by outliers. The proposed methodology is applied to income data to estimate the Theil index and the Gini coefficient for small domains in Tuscany (provinces by age groups), using survey and Census micro-data as auxiliary variables. In addition, a design-based simulation is carried out to study the behaviour of the proposed robust estimators. The performance of the bootstrap mean squared error estimator is also investigated in the simulation study.


2008 ◽  
Vol 78 (5) ◽  
pp. 443-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. González-Manteiga ◽  
M. J. Lombardía ◽  
I. Molina ◽  
D. Morales ◽  
L. Santamaría

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 35 ◽  
Author(s):  
PUTU EKA ARIWIJAYANTHI ◽  
I WAYAN SUMARJAYA ◽  
TJOKORDA BAGUS OKA

Small area is an area with insufficient sample for direct estimation. Limited survey objects, cause direct estimation can not produce better parameter estimates. Based on this, an indirect estimation method called empirical Bayes is used to obtain a better estimate. This study will compare means squared error by  direct estimation method and empirical Bayes method to find a better method on a small area. Jackknife is used to get the means squared error in the empirical Bayes. The results is, empirical Bayes methods give a better parameters based on mean squared errors. Empirical Bayes can produce a smaller mean squared error more than direct estimation in small area.


Test ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 367-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gauri Sankar Datta ◽  
Tatsuya Kubokawa ◽  
Isabel Molina ◽  
J. N. K. Rao

2007 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 2720-2733 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. González-Manteiga ◽  
M.J. Lombardía ◽  
I. Molina ◽  
D. Morales ◽  
L. Santamaría

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document